User talk:BeXoR/Archive/Sep 07

This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit this page. If you wish to leave me a message, do so on my talk page.

About Hero's Handbook and repeatable missions

Do you know if Reputation points are still being given as Missions' Rewards (Curse of the Nornbear, for example) ?? In the preview, we could repeat the same mission over and over to boost our norn title, but now it apparently only works the first time - this actually needs some testing, as i have already done all three norn missions. Another point - do you know if there is any way to complete the Hero's Handbook without redoing all missions?? Thanks.

OH, BTW, i got your name in the Talk page of one of the missions, you mentioned you redid said mission. --Pulse 16:00, 31 august 2007, (UTC).

I haven't done that dungeon quest since, but I'm sure I got the reputation points twice during the preview. I heard that it's been nerfed though on one of the title talk pages. - BeX 05:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

:(?

Turn that frown, upside down! Readem Promote My Ban Here 06:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

): - BeX 06:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

No! Now you turned the eyes backwards! Hang your head in shame :P /shame Readem Promote My Ban Here 06:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

- BeX 06:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

That is almost as creepy as Grinch's Chan "No u" gif, or Ensigns Worship Shrine, or perhaps even Ichigo's Emo Kid pic...or my Random Suicide Pic...or even that strange convo skak had... Readem Promote My Ban Here 06:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

o_O - BeX 06:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

You better not be making fun of the camels! - BeX 06:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

lol...you said the word "camel". Readem Promote My Ban Here 07:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

unsigned template

Hey- just a quick question: Why do you replace the unsigned template with the same text? Just curious if its a policy change, personal pref, etc. I've got you on watch, so no need to reply on my talk -elviondale (tahlk) 06:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

See Template:Unsigned and GWW:SIGN#Dealing_with_unsigned_comments. It is generally a good idea to subst most highly used templates because if they were ever to change it might crash the server with all the recaching. :P I'm not sure if there are other reasons behind it though. You'd have to ask someone with more technical knowledge. - BeX 06:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Ritualist Monument Armor

Hi, Would you like me to delete the armor gallery that I put in? As I don't know how to overwrite the section that you are talking about. If you would prefer to put your own gallery in, just let me know. I saw that the ritualist monument didn't have any gallery and I had pictures, so I thought no harm in putting them in. However, if I have over-stepped some editing boundaries then I am sorry.

Please advise on what you would like me to do.

Sagittarii.

P.S this is my first day using wiki, so if this message is in the wrong place, then I apologise for that too.! --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Sagittarii .

I think what Bexor meant with reverting at Ritualist armor is that we want to keep our consistent naming. So, instead of changing the name on that page, you click on the image you want to replace (probably Image:Ritualist Monument armor f.jpg) and scroll down a bit to find the "Upload a new version of this file" link. Click it, and upload your image. Then you will have replaced the old image with your new one, with correct name :) You don't have to delete anything. - anja 06:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

(Edit conflict cause I was ABing)

Your gallery is good, there's nothing wrong with that. On the profession index you changed the filename of an image to one of those which is what I reverted - there is a specific filename convention there because the main page (overview) images are different from the galleries (paper doll and component). If you think yours is better than the existing one, click on the crappy one and then select "Upload a new revision of this file" and follow the dialogues.

Also you should sign comments on talk pages with "~~~~". It leaves a link to your user page so that people can contact you. - BeX 06:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

My old sig

It was violating policy because I would have to upload my own version of the warrior shield, correct? I just wanted to know for sure. --- Raptors / RAAA!

yes. -- (gem / talk) 21:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

It's the size also, but I pretty sure you could cut a pixel off it on the side and bottom pretty easy. - BeX 01:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Userpage format

I took your user page format, i hope you dont mind. I dont know if that is good seen or bad seen.Coran Ironclaw 22:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. - BeX 01:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Ty for bullet color.Coran Ironclaw 18:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

np. :) - BeX 18:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Your signature image...

...doesn't redirect to your user page (GWW:SIGN). Since I don't like getting my hand slapped for touching people's user space, I didn't fix that myself. I just thought I'd let you know. ~ dragon legacy 05:58, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I completely forgot about that, it's been sitting there since June! Thanks. :D - BeX 06:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Design a Weapon

On your user page you mentioned you were selected as a finalist with your shield. That made me really curious and I would like to ask could you please be kind enough to share your entry with us? 58.110.139.72 12:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

I'll put it on a subpage sometime today. :) - BeX 01:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Check out User:BeXoR/Contests. - BeX 07:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Those are wonderful! I really like that shield... Think we'll ever get something like that to drop in-game? (Come on, how cool would that be?) - Thulsey - talk 12:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Thusley. :) I don't know if they will ever add it, but it would be majorly cool if they did. - BeX 12:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Removed change

Why did you remove my change on Modniir Mane? Just curious Erpbridge 00:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Technically all trophies give you a profit, and having a category that says otherwise is incorrect and redundant. Plus the name did not follow formatting. - BeX 00:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Did you read the purpose statement of the category in the category itself? Please read the purpose statement of the category before dismissing the usage of such a category. Erpbridge 01:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I know the purpose of the category, but it is completely misnamed and thus incorrect. Please read Guild Wars Wiki:Formatting/Article names also. - BeX 01:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I suggest you bring this up at Guild Wars Wiki:Formatting/Items before making any further changes. - BeX 01:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Yo

Hey Bex, please don't change the warrior silver eagle article. It's mis-behaving, and I've set the formatting to correct the issue until someone can look at, and fix it. Thanks - Drago 02:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I'd fixed the image so there was no need for you to revert. - BeX 04:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)