User talk:Calor/Archive 2

Clean Page

Nice spotless page ... well not anymore :P --Kakarot 01:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, at least it wasn't Eloc. Calor (t) 01:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

If you want a welcome template on your talk page I would be more than happy to provide one xD --Kakarot 01:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

This user reserves the right to remove any welcomes, template or otherwise, from his talk page(s) without punishment from site adminstrators :p Calor (t) 01:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

<Censored comment> --Cursed Angel 02:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm enforcing my rights. Calor (t) 02:08, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

:D --Cursed Angel 02:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey, there -- Brains12 • Talk • 16:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm surprised Brains shirked off his duty as an admin to uphold all policies and to restore CA's removed comment. Wow. But don't think that mans I want that there, because I'll take it off is it's restored. Calor (t) 18:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Well... using my ultraspecialuberleetpower called discretion there, I didn't restore the comment seeing as it's not a policy warning, notice etc and no harm done if you choose to "censor" it. I wouldn't have reverted it as a non-admin, either. That's not to say I'm endorsing this. -- Brains12 • Talk • 18:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Eloc will come along and restore it soon enough :p Calor (t) 18:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Guild Wars Wiki:Welcome policy. Enforcer:Eloc. Reverter:Everyone else. Official policy. -- Brains12 • Talk • 18:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Greetings, Calor! I'd love to welcome you, but unfortunately we totally do not want you! So, well. Piss off. If you have anything else to say, visit my talk page. Please visit this page for more information. hiya. - Y0_ich_halt 18:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) New policy: GWW:ELOC. Any user named Eloc or Eloc Jcg, or a sockpuppet of said user, may not make one of the first five posts on a talk page. Oh, Y0... Calor (t) 18:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

sorry, i couldn't stand it :) - Y0_ich_halt 18:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll leave it solely because it's a joke, not a welcome, and I'm cool with Y0. Calor (t) 18:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

If a non-welcome is what you are looking, I can help
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Guild Wars Wiki again, you will be blocked from editing.
=p -- Coran Ironclaw 21:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry *head sinks* :p Calor (t) 21:08, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

lol, about time someone warned him for his disruptive edits :D --Cursed Angel 21:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

*ignores this page and moves on* - anja 21:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Poor Anja was looking for a good discussion, but nay... Calor (t) 21:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

exactly the right thing to do, anja. - Y0_ich_halt 21:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Well well well, talking about me behind my back, are we? :P — ク Eloc 貢 23:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Brains, ban him before he does more damage! :p Calor (t) 00:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Delete

Heh, thanks for adding the }} I missed on those delete tags earlier =) Rappy 02:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Heh, it was only one. Thanks for cleaning up the Xtera mess. Calor (t) 02:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I thought I had the correct user at first, then realized they didn't have a page in their actual userspace, which caused me to find 5+ pages in the wrong spot. =p Rappy 03:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I made the same mistake, then I checked RC and all the pages and uploaded images, and kinda figured it was one user, six accounts, and a jumbled mess. Calor (t) 03:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

hay cheers for that, im kinda new to this :( but im tryin .so if i wanted a pic of recka saved it should be under ...(user heathchief recka.jpeg)  ??? --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Heathchief (talk).

Everyone's new at some point; I had similar troubles in the beginning. And that naming is perfect for a picture of Recka. Calor (t) 04:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

thanks calor ill try not an mess up again  :)--Heathchief 04:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. And don't get tense, as we all make mistakes, and the wiki's seen worse. Calor (t) 04:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm Xtera seems clueless, seems he has registered 7-8 different 'users' setup for 7-8 different 'characters' is there a way to delete all these users and get all these pages unified? This is more of this 'mess.' Rappy 01:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I noticed it more today, but I wasn't up to going around again. The pages can be deleted, but not the account. Calor (t) 01:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

hey nub

http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/User_talk:Vanguard :) - Vanguard 12:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

And I thought the yellow new messages tag was the start of an intelligent discussion.. Ah well. Neat animation though. Calor (t) 19:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Teehee. I never fail to disappoint.- Vanguard 22:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Haha. This time I was prepared. Calor (t) 23:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Radiation Field

mines too. i give informations even myself would have need not so long ago. if you too can't think for someone else than yourself : fuck. i leave the page radiation field, and if you don't want to give information either, what's the point about being here on gwiki ? lussh 20:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I reverted myself after a conversation on IRC with Anja. There was strong favor on the talk page for not having the note, regardless of your beliefs. We could have either no note pertaining to that topic, or forty notes on all the possibilities. And if players want to figure some obscure combination, then they should go to the Condition page and check the degeneration amount and methods of application for various conditions. It contains the note for now, but I assume this will re-spark the debate on the talk page over there. Calor (t) 20:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Lussh, consensus doesn't mean your personal view on things, it is the general view of the community. The talk page has shown that the general consensus is that the note is not needed. Unless Mathematics has been taken off of every school's syllabi, it is not hard to do a sum to find how long the disease duration is in effect after the skill has recharged, and how long the hex will stay combined with the disease. -- Brains12 • Talk • 20:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm entering high school in a few months and we haven't had new material in four years..so I guess it has. But Lussh, you can't be some sort of freelance editor who disregards consensus, because the entire community as a whole is likely correct, instead of one person. Calor (t) 21:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

sorry i don't think about what you think and know, i think about who'll need quick informations and tips. but do what you want, as i said, i leave this page. It seems to be hard to think that others may not be you and do the best for them, not what pleases you. lussh 21:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

What pleases the wiki community is informing players. What doesn't please the community is filling the page of a skill with dozens of useless, obscure notes, as would have to be the result if your note was added. Calor (t) 21:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

oh my, it's hopeless. lussh 21:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Hopefully the note there now will please us all? -- Brains12 • Talk • 22:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm great with it. You, Lussh? Calor (t) 22:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification

Hey Calor

I'd just like to say a quick thanks- i've been a user of the wiki for years, but only recently made my account. I had no idea that the (staff? contributors? do you get paid? :P) took such care and commitment to its golden pages. I'll make sure not to delete my comments, i realize that they could probably help others not to do the same thing i did :P I hope that i'm not causing any dischord because of all the mistakes i've been making! I appreciate all the help and i'll try to keep in

AegisEdesia 22:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

For the record, no. We don't get paid, and Calor isn't an administrator =P He's just a regular user like you, though he does seem to make quite a lot of excellent contributions. Yay. MisterPepe talk 22:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

In my dreams I'd be paid, ANet is the 'staff', and hopefully I'll be an administrator some time in the future. And everyone makes those elementary mistakes; they hardly cause 'discord'. Calor (t) 22:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Getting paid to wiki would totally rock. MisterPepe talk 22:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

50 cents per press of F5. That'd get me about two hundred dollars per hour, at least. Calor (t) 22:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy

Just wanted to let you know, clearing a page that you are the sole editor of doesn't qualify for speedy deletion (unless the page is less than one day old) -- Brains12 • Talk • 20:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I didn't clear it and i wasn't an editor (minus the delete tag), some member of that guild did. But thanks, I wasn't sure how the rule for blanking and speedy delete worked. Calor (t) 20:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry, I meant "you" as in a generic "you" that blanked a page. -- Brains12 • Talk • 20:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, no problem. Thanks anyways. Calor (t) 20:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

"Americanized"

Please don't "fix" what's not broken. See the discussion of the (failed) policy proposal Guild Wars Wiki:Use American English. This is an international wiki, not an American one. If you disagree with that, please revive the policy and lets have a discussion about it there. Until then, please don't go out "Americanizing" anything, as it's unwarranted. Thanks. --Dirigible 15:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Ah, sure. To be honest, I didn't even know that rejected policy existed. Calor (t) 17:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Unsigned Mistake

The unsigned comment in the scams discussion page was there before I edited it. You'll have to continue your search for a different member to pin that comment on ;) Cheers! Natso 21:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I do things too hastily, now don't I? I'll go take a look. Calor (t) 21:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I just found it. It was an IP. I looked at the history before and naturally assumed "Most recent in history = Last comment down" Calor (t) 21:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

It's fine, lol. I probably would have made the same mistake in haste as well ^_^ Natso 01:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

testing

sorry bout that Calor, new to editing on wiki, still getting used to the idea of creating a new page by making a link to it first.

Drypedyx 23:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Heh, no problem. People have made far uglier mistakes, and almost every new user makes some sort of mistake. Calor (t) 23:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

You told me that I was causing a revert war, what is that? (from anonymous)

Hi

HI CALOR!!! 67.52.214.40 01:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Uhhh, hi? Calor (t) 01:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

HI CALOR!!! 89.112.2.176 01:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Calor. — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 01:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey Skakid. Anons get on my nerves, especially those that do the same actions on different IP's suggesting they have access to an open proxy, which no normal joe needs, which implies that they are a user with a rather malicious intent. Or maybe it's just me on a late evening in a stressful week after a vandalism streak that really pissed me off. Either way, I'm not exactly fond of anons right now. Calor (t) 01:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

That was no normal anon attack, they had good knowledge of the wiki, I mean changing {{tl}} so the flood would show up on multiple pages at once. — Rappy 02:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Mhm. And then a load of pasting. Calor (t) 02:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I didn't even notice {{guild}} (looked farther down RC) this was the same guy hitting Gaile Gray's page earlier, up until the page was protected. Then he started hitting Random Page and kept Brains, myself and others constantly reverting random pages =\ — Rappy 02:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Userpage

In my browser (Firefox) your content box is all below the userbox column, and the userboxes moves outside the box, so to speak. Was this maybe intended? :P - anja 21:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

No lol. I'm on Firefox, too, and it looks perfectly fine for me. Calor (t) 21:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I get the same as Anja. -- Brains12 • Talk • 21:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Sigh..Ah well. So the main left-hand box is below the right-hand thin Userbox box, correct? Calor (t) 21:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm using IE and I get the userboxes outside the box causing horizontal scrolling. Not sure what Anja means about the content box but I noticed the last line of the thanks section is half in the blue box half out; could be what she means. --Kakarot 21:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) You may need to sort out your floating code. -- Brains12 • Talk • 21:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I figured it was the float, and for Kakarot I'll probably do something with overflow. If either of you three get bored, feel free to edit it so it looks right on your browser(s), considering it looks fine for me Calor (t) 21:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I tried something in my sandbox, and that looks fine for me. No overflow or shortage of background.-- Brains12 • Talk • 21:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I took a look at it. No overflow for me, but a bit of a gap. Ah well, I'll live with it. Calor (t) 21:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

And I saw what else you did, and I totally agree. *Goes searching for more* Calor (t) 22:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Not sure if you all are talking about the same, but at low resolutions the bottom of the page get mixed with the categories list... may i suggest changing the height limit to something like 100% instead of 800px?.--Fighterdoken 22:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) What else did I do?-- Brains12 • Talk • 22:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I have all afternoon/evening, so I'll screw around wit the code and take everyone's problems into consideration. Calor (t) 22:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

@Fighterdoken - using 100% for the height causes the content and userboxes to no longer line up which is I assume what Calor wants. Using either 810px or 815px for the height looks good though. --Kakarot 22:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

It is what I want, but I won't die without that. In my sandbox I've screwed around with that code a bit. Calor (t) 22:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Umm looking at the code, you have the div for 20% on the user boxes floated right. The problem with that, is that's a literal right and it overflows. Since the userboxes are left aligned inside the div, if you change the right-floated div to 23% it increases the size of the div and effectively moves your users boxes far enough to the left to allow for them to end before the end of the 100% div. Hope that helps. — Rappy 22:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

In the sandbox? I see no problems on Firefox 1440 by whatever resolution. But eh, before I put anything else on my userpage I'll see everything here and check for problems. Calor (t) 22:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Anja Astor/Sandbox/Calor. That's how I would do it, not saying it's the best solution. - anja 22:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

It looks good. I don't see any glaring errors, but then again I haven't the whole time. Calor (t) 22:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Agreed, that's probably the best solution (anja's), but he admitted to not wanting the white space between the two. In FF 1280x1024 it clips for me. I assume on smaller resolutions it would clip more. — Rappy 22:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, no white space. I can do that. I think. *feels challenged* - anja 22:50, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Anja, no need to worry about everyone else. Go have fun doing old updates or something :p. I can live with the white space in exchange for the page looking fairly good for everyone else. Calor (t) 22:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

*tada* - anja 22:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Uhm, sorry for intruding. But I'm bored and user pages are fun. :P *goes to fix old updates* - anja 23:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Lol, it's helping. And, errmm...enjoy? Calor (t) 23:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Just a suggestion but for your navbar on this page it might look better if you change the background colour from cadetblue to powderblue. Partly so it fits in with the colour scheme of your user page but also because the present one is a bit hard on the eyes to look at. --Kakarot 02:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

'Tis done, dear sire :p Calor (t) 02:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

nominated

I nominated you, I think that will be good for the wiki. Guild_Wars_Wiki:Requests_for_adminship#Pending_nominations -- Coran Ironclaw 03:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Roflmaolololololololol. I accept. Thanks, it's a lot to know I'm not the only one fighting for my own cause on the wiki. Now to set up a legitimate page... Calor (t) 03:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

ermm, actually that was not a joke. -- Coran Ironclaw 03:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't think he took it as a joke, cuz he set up the page. I voted already (yay first vote!).--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 03:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Of course I didn't take it as a joke. The Rofl...ol was to express my surprise at my sudden nomination. But thanks for the nomination. Calor (t) 03:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

you are welcome. =) -- Coran Ironclaw 03:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

grats Calor on your RfA, I have no doubt it will 'not' be a failed one. — Rappy 05:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Good luck on your RfA. --Hawk Skeer 15:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Calor (t) 17:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

=( I guess I am not active enough to do a good judgment. -- Coran Ironclaw 17:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't see why you couldn't. — Rappy 00:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Eh, I know I have flaws, and I had a feeling it would turn out to be a half and half vote, but I went with it anyways. Thanks for the nomination, the constructive criticism, and the support from some, Calor (t) 00:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Doesn't everybody? I don't think I have ever met anyone without flaws. =) — Rappy 00:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Eh, namely my inexperience in handling unique situations with other users. Calor (t) 00:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

*cough*raptors*cough* - Y0_ich_halt 01:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Eh, you can't deny Raptors's resilience and ingenuity. He wouldn't give up. At the time it seemed letting him off on the condition that the first time he slipped up it would be a long ban seemed a good price to get rid of wiki enemy #1. Calor (t) 01:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah well, there's always next month! I still support you! (Though the Raptor's thing was kind of a breaker for most I see). --People of Antioch talk 01:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

RfA's are done by time of nomination, not by any set period, like elections. And it wouldn't be smart to do another RfA for at least, say, three months at the minimum, and I don't intend to. Calor (t) 02:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

armor icons naming

hi, sry for disturbing you, but as i know that you wanted to upload several images - and i really embrace this - Bex says the armor icon naming is still incorrect, so i wanted to note this on your talk page before you start uploading your images under wrong naming, as i still don't use the adjusted name for the icons. So, instead of
"Image:Ranger Elite Druid chest m icon.png"
, it should rather be
"Image:Ranger Elite Druid Vest m.png"
(in other words, the image should consist of the armor piece name in the first part, and the gender (letter) in the second. As this piece is written big ingame and counts as proper name, all except the gender has to be written with caps. Finally, consider that some pieces use other names than shown in the tables of the corresponding armor page, e.g. Scar Pattern armor or Tatoos...) —ZerphaThe Improver 14:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. I don't have any icons saved, but I have an idea of where they are, and then I'll need to do some referencing to see what armor type it is, and if it has already been uploaded from the .dat. But anyways, thanks, now I have a little easily-accessible cheat sheet for when I do get around to uploading some icons from the .dat. Calor (t) 19:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Nice one

Good job on the recent events today. See, this is why you would be a good Sysop. Though, we'll see where this issue goes with more time. --People of Antioch talk 00:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Eh, today's been a good day overall for me. I have flaws, like everyone else does. And Minikitty will be an interesting issue. Calor (t) 00:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you check this out?

I edited Hylas as a disambiguate page, could you go see if I did it right? Thanks. --People of Antioch talk 01:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC) ‎
Nevermind, someone else caught it. --People of Antioch talk 01:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I notice aberrant did, but he reverted it for other reasons, not by quality. I believe if that was to stay a disambig page, you would've done it right. Calor (t) 01:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I checked. You could've removed the "NPC" because that's the only category of disambiguations, and a "-" between name and definition would've been nice. But you have the fundamentals down :) Calor (t) 01:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the constructive criticism and the wonderful complements. --People of Antioch talk 01:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Paragon Elonian Leggings m.png

Copy and paste tags/category ftl (thanks for the correction) :P -- Brains12 \ Talk 15:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

You see everything, don't you? And I c/p everything too, I just happen to be lucky enough to notice most of my mistakes. Anyways, no problem :) Calor (t) 19:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Brains has got an alarm clock set to trigger whenever the recent changes rss gets updated, obviously.... — Galil 19:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually, every edit I make gets put into my watchlist, and seeing as I uploaded that image, it pinged up :) -- Brains12 \ Talk 21:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Check before reverting please.

You just reverted the LoD change i made when it has in fact been changed. Please check changes instead of aimlessly reverting it. 195.7.241.124 19:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

My apologies. I quickly checked GuildWiki, and saw it hadn't been changed. No updates had been posted yet either, so I assumed it was joke vandalism. Calor (t) 19:51, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

I just checked in-game. You're right. There's been vandalism to skill numbers before, so I stupidly assumed this also was. Calor (t) 19:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem, i'd probably have done the same lol. Good job on being so quick though. 195.7.241.124 19:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

The quickness was luck. I clicked the Recent Changes and that was the first thing on top. I always check IP edits, as I naturally don't trust unregistered users. Thanks for being so cool with this, Calor (t) 19:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah sorry i forgot to login, i'm not very active on wiki anyway but saw it'd been changed and thought i may as well do it. Fowlero 20:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem either way. I made a minor error, you quickly fixed it, no hurt feelings :) Calor (t) 20:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Z0mg! Breakage of GWW:AGF!!!!!... or dont you have that? --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 12:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Calor from school illegaly here. Well, it's a blue link, so we do, obviously. Bit late, eh? Calor 18:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)