User talk:Chronicinability

Sig Test.... --ChronicinabilitY 20:30, 29 March 2007 (EDT) --ChronicinabilitY 18:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Nice template

Hi. I am new to editing in GuildWiki and I needed to do a User page, but I had no idea about the coding form, so I a little bit copied your User style. I wondered if it was OK with you, if not, I would erase everything with no problems. You can see the page here: User:PatouPower. Leave me a message if you have a problem with this, thank you! User:PatouPower

Personal userspace images

Hello. Images that are for personal use in user pages or subpages must be properly named; in this case, they need the prefix User Chronicinability; ("User Chronicinability Josospitefull.jpg", for example). They also need to be tagged with {{user image}}, as described in GWW:USER#User images. It'd be great if you could reupload those four pictures you just uploaded to conform with those two policy rules. Once you've done that, you can add a {{delete|reason}} tag to the old pictures, and a sysop will delete them for you as soon as possible. Thanks. :) --Dirigible 20:38, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Done! Thanks for help. I'll be out of GWiki mode and into OffWiki mode in no time! --ChronicinabilitY 21:29, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Hi, thes two images 12 are too big, the max size is 100kb, there up for delete ~ Kurd11:36, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

Ther's no way to gt the filesize smaller, its already a GW-created Jpeg so they'll have to stay as they are. --ChronicinabilitY 00:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Try to shrink them by reducing size. (You beat me more than once with that "bad guild page"... I think a note "please read guild page guidelines" in summary reads better than "added bad guild page tag"... so people know what to do to get their page right). - MSorglos 15:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

The not of please reas the guidlines is in the note itself, which they are much more likely to see than the recent updates page. I can start adding it i just felt that a simple summary was enough since the people reading it are already familiar with the policies we have in place. --ChronicinabilitY 15:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Too Fast!

You keep on beating me to tagging bad guild pages! Thanks for that note on Guild Talk:Geeks With Sword, although you even beat me to that :p Good to know it's not just me trawling Recent Changes at the moment ^ ^ AT 05:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Well some of us have to keep on top of it otherwise by this time tomorrow there will be thousands of guidls with messy pages! haha. And yeh i thought if we have to tag it twice we should prob put a note on their page. Might save us tagging the same one over and over. --ChronicinabilitY 05:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Theres always someone on =P -- File:Blackgeneralstar.png (General | Talk) 05:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, it looks to me like more people are getting the gist of Guild page creation. I think my work here is done. Mr. insomniac is going to find a small crevice to hide in for a couple of hours. =P -- File:Blackgeneralstar.png (General | Talk) 08:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

i do feel i should do the same...its 9:05am...which isnt a terrible thing...unless you consider i havent even been to sleep yet! --ChronicinabilitY 08:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, I ran out of sleeping pills and other meds -.- So, my gf is NOT happy right now. Trust me, doesn't mix well with depression. Ugh! -- File:Blackgeneralstar.png (General | Talk) 08:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Signature

You're signature is not GWW:SIGN#Images-compliant. Can you please change the picture to one that links to your userpage? Don't forget to use the correct name for it either. --  (CoRrRan / talk) 18:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

=O i didnt realise that was part of the policy, to be honest I think I've just used this sig forever, I'll upload the SS pic asap, thx for letting me know. --ChronicinabilitY 18:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

No prob. I realize it's hard to know all policies right away, I've had my fair share of policy-vios. :) --  (CoRrRan / talk) 18:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

That would be fine if I was new....but since i'm really not I feel I should have known better! :S lol --ChronicinabilitY 18:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Guild guidelines

Hi. Twice now, you've blanked the guild page I created. Twice, I read through the guild pages policy. Could you please let me know what it is about the policy that I'm violating? And by the way, thanks for the notification that the guild page didn't meet the guidelines. A quick note on my Talk page would have been appreciated. At this point I will not be creating a guild page, but I would like to know what it is that is so bad that it must be blanked immediately. --Nkuvu 19:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Replied on you're talk page --ChronicinabilitY 19:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Chronic, please be aware that currently only the {{guild}} and {{guild infobox}}-templates are required and that Guild:Example Guild is just an example of how they are implemented. You don't have to make Guild:Example Guild look mandatory. --  (CoRrRan / talk) 19:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Guild Image: Battle Scars Impossible Odds cape.jpg

The image you recently uploaded (Image:Battle Scars Impossible Odds cape.jpg) does not comply with the Guild Wars Wiki image naming policy and has been tagged for deletion. Please feel free to re-upload the image under a correct name. Thanks, -FireFox File:Firefoxav.png 05:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorted, thanks. --ChronicinabilitY 18:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Dude where are you

Man I havent seen u online for like 3 weeks :O whats up? Quazark Zeklar 19:03, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

User template

I noticed that your user page shows up in the user templates category. I think this is because you have copies userboxes (in stead of using the inclusion shortcuts) and accidentaly also copied in the [[Category:User templates]] parts. --Lensor (talk) 10:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Oops! Think I've sorted it. Cheers for that.--ChronicinabilitY 11:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Account Titles Category

Hi Chronicinability, seems your GvGTitle and BalthTitle pages are using the Title infobox, which makes them appear in the Category : Account Titles [1] page. It's a bit confusing to have user suggested titles appear in that category.. :) Maybe use a plain table with the same formatting? Me55enger 06:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Lol i seem to be dropping myself into loads of catagories atm...i'll get them sorted. --ChronicinabilitY 20:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

But he still hasnt replied on them xD Quazark Zeklar 20:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Mousemove notes on the update page

Hi Chronicinability, you removed a note about a new mousemove bug that I placed on the update page with the justification that it isn't true. The mousemove bug that I mentioned is in fact occuring and I've verified this with other users. I'm going to restore the note, if you want more information about how to reproduce the effect then feel free to contact me. --Pork soldier 04:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

The note stated that while hovering the mouse over an areu such as the minimap and pressing the 2 mousebuttons in this no longer moves the character forward. This is incorrect...I can do it right now, its still works fine. Pleas post a note on the talk page rather than start a revert war. --ChronicinabilitY 04:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I just doublechecked this, it's working again - so yeah, that note doesn't need to be there --Pork soldier 04:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

FWIW This was happening last night, I verified it with a few other people at the time and it was driving me absolutely nuts. --Pork soldier 04:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Dude

If ure here right now can u log on i missed u by 5 mins >.>  Quazark Zeklar  20:20, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Infuse Health

Please stop the revert war in Infuse Health. It gains no one that people are removing it and readding it. We have already made clear it's NOT a problem with the article, it's a general problem with our skill page design, and according to the skill formatting guide, there's no problem with it. Also, a lot of people does not see any problems with it, since they have other resolutions than you have, so they will probably keep removing it in good faith. It would be much more productive if you actually brought the problem up and explained it on the skill formatting talk, so we can solve it. - anja 15:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

The problam HAS been brought up, and if people see a Clean-up tag they should NOT just remove it without at least looking at the talk page, if they had done that then they would realise that it was there for a reason! The tag is obviously drawing attention to the page which is what it is meant to do, so as long as its there the problem might get solved, if its removed it will be ignored. So i will continue to add the tag until the problem is solved. --ChronicinabilitY 16:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

The problem needs to be brought up and explained on the skill formatting, since it's a general skill formatting problem. I see you have made a note also, let's hope more people will see it.
I can understand you want the tag to stay, but we want to avoid revert wars, as they just mess things up and make people angry, instead of solving the problem. You are not helping to solve the problem by just readding the tag. If you feel this is a big problem, bring up discussion, don't get into revert wars, it's not helping your point :)
As I don't see the same problem as you do (I have a bigger resolution) I can't really argue for a good solution.
As a side note, the cleanup tag is really meant to point out things in the article that doesn't follow the formatting guideline, and everything in the article does, so I would argue it's the wrong tag to have there. I wont remove it (revert wars) but I wont readd it, it's being used for the wrong purpose here. - anja 16:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

There isn't a tag to show what is wrong with it, and the cleanup is the closest we have. By having it there like i said before it's drawing attention to it, which is all that it needs to do so it can be fixed. It may also be a good thing for not so regular users of the wiki who see that page to know that if it looks wrong on their resolution, we are at least aware of the problem. --ChronicinabilitY 16:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned image

Image:UserChronicinability josospitefull.jpg was discovered orphaned (unused) and is tagged for deletion. If you intend to use this image, please remove the deletion tag :) - anja 09:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

I thought i tagged that for deletion myself. Either way no it's not needed and i see that it's already gone so its all good. --ChronicinabilitY 12:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

:)

Take it as you will. Readem (talk*gwwcontribs) 23:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Heya

Just some well-intentioned feedback, please don't take this as a formal warning or anything of the sort - you might want to see if you can double-check yourself before posting comments on izzy's comment pages to make sure they don't come across as overly personal. While it's nothing that'd really be in violation of GWW:NPA, it does seem to have a tendency to distract discussion from the actual topic, meaning the entire conversation becomes less constructive (and I realize that it's not necessarily your fault that conversations take such a turn). So perhaps just a quick glance over what you write before you post it, a thought about "is this going to make the best case I can for my point, or is it just going to antagonize someone", intentionally or not. :) (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 05:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeh sorry, i probably should. I do generally keep in mind and never write anything specifically personal, just sometimes it's just very hard to be as diplomatic as we know we should be you know what i mean? I'll try and watch it more and if i ever did think i'd been anywhere near breaching GWW:NPA i'd be the first to correct myself and appologise. --ChronicinabilitY 05:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

This anything to the protective spirit and charm animal skills needing a nerf? :P Quazark Zeklar 16:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry protective BOND hehe Quazark Zeklar 16:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

More to do with Mending Touch and Distracting Shot as i remember. Not sure though. --ChronicinabilitY 19:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I need a favor.

Here's an easy job for you; could you do me a favor and click on the image in my signature? I just gave it a redirect, but I can't tell if it's working yet. I need someone who hasn't clicked the image yet to test it for me, and it looks like you're online. :P -- Ĵĩôřũĵĩ Đēŗāķō.>.cнаt^ 12:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

No its not working and it seems to be redirected right at first glance...i'll have a look trying to sort it for ya iin a sec --ChronicinabilitY 12:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Probably just a cache error, I only redirected it a little while ago. Sometimes the server takes a while to fix stuff like that... thanks for the second opinion. No need to bother trying to fix it, it'll probably fix itself... thanks in advance if you do happen to fix it, though. -- Ĵĩôřũĵĩ Đēŗāķō.>.cнаt^ 12:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

You fixed it. Didn't think of rearranging the tag like that... :P -- Ĵĩôřũĵĩ Đēŗāķō.>.cнаt^ 12:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Yep sorted it =D --ChronicinabilitY 12:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Fail less plx

[2]. Readem Hate Mail Goes Here 03:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

"willful or ignorant destruction of artistic or literary treasures." --ChronicinabilitY 03:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

It is neither Artistic, nor treasured...lulz. Readem Hate Mail Goes Here 05:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Talk page revert war

Cease this now, text should not be removed from talk pages, even if off topic, unless it is constitutes an extreme case personal attack. --Lemming 17:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Fine, stand by and watch the wiki become a mess. I'll leave this one since its obvious you're just going to put the crap content back on the page, but if i see others i will do the same, which is what you , as an admin, should also be doing! Take some responsibility before GWW becomes one big spam-thread! --ChronicinabilitY 17:45, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Our responsibility is to make sure the policies are followed. Not to remove jokes/off-topic content from talk pages. - anja 17:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

That is the entire problem here...you think you have no responsibility. Tell me then....if it's not you're job to remove this pointless content, then who's is it? And if you dare say the community...then stop telling me not to! (And yes i did notice you change your comment as you saw the great flaw in it) --ChronicinabilitY 17:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

It's nobodys job, since it's not allowed. See Lemmings comment. - anja 17:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

And you don't see that there is something glaringly wrong with that?!?! You really should! And the most ridicoulous part is i can see you banning me for simply trying to keep the wiki usefull, while protecting the trolls and all their crap they post. Sort it out!! If this happens i will simply create an 'Archived Crap' box on every talk page that needs it and just move it all to there. Thereby following policy, and still helping to keep the wiki useable, which is more than i can say thet the current Sysops are doing. --ChronicinabilitY 18:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

I see something glaringly wrong with sysops, elected to be glorified janitors, going about applying personal preferences on what content should be kept and what should be removed. And likewise for users. Discussion is good, censorship without a consensus behind it, is not. In my opinion. - anja 18:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Then if that is you're view and you are not willing to help the wiki using your own thoughts, just do what other people tell you, then you should not be in that position IMO. There have been many proposals recently of how to deal with this issue, too many to list, most with very little opposition, yet have we seen the sysops accept one and use it as policy? Of course not because they all seem too scared to and just sit there hoping someone else will do it instead. Then when concerned individuals like myself try and do something good for the wiki, the sysops suddenly think 'ooh i can do something against that and i know other sysops will support me' So they do. I'm sorry for the rant and maybe simply removing it was not the best idea, as i was aware that it was against policy. I have now however rectified the problem and dealt with it in a way that is not breaking any current policies. I don't mean to rant, but like i said before, i'm not going to stand by and watch as the wiki becomes a Spam-Thread --ChronicinabilitY 18:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

You may find not everyone finds removing sarcastic statements you disagree with constitutes helping the wiki. Please desist. Backsword 18:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

They weren't removed...they were archived, and since the page is over its size limits then archiving is needed, and that is the first comment to be archived because of its uselessness! I'm following policy. Tell me how 'Unarchiving' back onto an already too big page is following policy. --ChronicinabilitY 18:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

A sysops job and responsibilities are clearly defined, as are site policies. As for removing off topic dicussion on a talk page, that you describe as "pointless content", it is on a talk page, it is not part of the content as such. A decision was made at some point that random censoring of talk pages, whatever the content is, is not permitted, and this is the rule we uphold. You should not be yelling at the sysops for not overstepping their bounds in this situation to support your opinion in this matter. If I was to decide, hey, I don't like this guy yelling at me for doing my job wrong, I am going to ban him, how would that be any different? --Lemming 18:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

No-one has yet to answer why a policy has not been put in place to spefically deal with these problems though! There are many proposals and suggestions, formalise and accept one! Then you can go about being janitors again. Personally if i get time i will write a new proposal for the sysop roll, present it to the community, which will then most probably require a re-election of sysops. Because simply as it is, if you feel you are doing all you are meant to, then it is just not working! Having said all that i do appologise for my tone, it wasn't meant to be aimed specifically at anyone, and i have worked within policy now, and will do from now onwards. --ChronicinabilitY 18:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Hope you're in a better mood now. You and me, we both know you weren't archiving. You were trying to hide a comment you disliked. And community consensus is strongly against that. But as it happens, policy for this has not been finalised yet, so it's not a sysop matter. The page has been restored now (and some archiving has been done, you right in the need for that). I hope we can agree to leave it like that. Backsword 21:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Again you have mistaken the role of a sysop, we do not have superiority to decide which policies to accept or turn down. That is the communities decision. If a consensus can not be reached then it is clear that policy is not widely supported or justified. I am sorry you feel the way you do about the sysop programme here, the type of sysop you are proposing has been suggested previously and was turned down by the community. You are well within your rights to start that discussion up again, in fact it already has here. Again, do not shoot the messengers please. --Lemming 18:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

No policy is defined to deal with such problems, because not enough people find it to be a problem (and have strong enough arguments to form a consensus), I think, Chronicinability. - anja 20:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Skill bar template

Hi, this is just a heads up that "Template:Mini skill bar" is up for deletion. All the various skill bar templates have been replaced with {{Skill bar}} and {{Skill bar preset}}. Thanks. -- ab.er.rant 09:14, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

heh thanks

I meant to put that on his talk page. --Lemming 21:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi, stop cluttering Talk:Main Page

If you have disagreements with anyone about topics unrelated to the main page color, take it to their talk page. Thanks. -Auron 02:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Just to note...

...You and me are tied on the most linked to pages page, with a total of 180 pages linking back to our respective userpages. Disregard the fact that, by posting here, I have now reached an almighty 181 links and have surpassed you. Thought you might like to know how awesome you (and by extension, myself) are.

Not quite as awesome as Ab.er.rant (rank 46, 1,098 links), but still. You're on par with Wintersday itself, as well as Scroll of Rampager's Insight and the Bonus Mission Pack... -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 09:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Crap, I already posted here once. I'm still stuck at 180 links. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 09:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

hmmm. and i only ever post on things on my watchlist these days! guess that means i have a fairly big watchlist =/ --ChronicinabilitY 15:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I rarely leave my watchlist unless a page on my watchlist leads me there; I think the first 100 or so links are from when I was first roaming the wiki, and nothing had my signature on it yet. From there on out, just like you, I don't post too much on other pages, so the number just climbs slowly. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 17:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Lemming64's RFA

In case you haven't been watching RFAs, Lemming64's reconfirmation has started, and several users have been asking for the original reasons for the reconfirmation request. It would be nice if you could elaborate on your reasons for the reconfirmation request that was made. -- ab.er.rant 03:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)