User talk:Lemming64/Archive1007

Weeee

Weeee, another messed up userpage! yay! /messes it up via grafitti --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:88.240.20.61 .

You what?... --Lemming 18:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

That was....strange....--- Raptors / RAAA!

Beat me to it

Aww, you beat me to changing the Template for . I was just about to do it once I finished going through Category:Repeatable quests--§ Eloc § 21:26, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Heh, sorry, I was just itching to do it :) --Lemming 21:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Np, I went through and finished that Category on the explorable areas where you get the quests.--§ Eloc § 21:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Cool Layout

Is there somewhere on this site where I can find cool layouts for my userpage like the one you have? -- Raguok 00:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

There isn't really a central conglomeration of user page layouts, however I know that Kurd has made a list on his user page of ones he thinks are cool. Most users are perfectly happy for you to duplicate or use parts of their designs as long as you ask first and give them credit. --Lemming 00:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Raguok 00:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

To the Vandal

I don't know what you are hoping to achieve, but you might consider reading w:Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. --Lemming 00:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/72.18.206.72 needs a block, not quite sure how to use the Admin noticeboard or if this should even go there Fall 00:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

blocked :) --Lemming 00:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

LASVEGAS-NV-US.APLUSHOSTING.COM. for 72.206.18.72.in-addr.arpa PTR record: Reports from [64.235.32.203], try blocking 64.235.32.203 to see if he stops Fall 00:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Idk why this guy would do something like this against you and Fall, but I'm guessing it's a wiki'er' that you must of upset =P--Insane Maestro 01:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Happens to all of us.--§ Eloc § 04:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Halloween Pics

Maybe it's just my browser, but some of the new "halloween images" on the Main Page seem very blurry. I don't know if they look fine to you because of a different resolution, but I'm on IE, 1400x900 px. Anja fixed up the "Event" picture, but the "PvP", GWW Shield, and "Equip" ones look pixelly and distorted. I can probably fix them up on GIMP, but I just wanted to see if they were slightly messed up for other people, too, in which case I'll leave them alone. Calor - talk 22:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

The shield, "pvp" and the "main event are pretty messed up for me. Especially the main event, it is stretched too far downwards. I'm also using firefox. --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!

I think it's safe to presume that the server cache has not yet purged the previously uploaded images. Please wait a little while for them to refresh :) LordBiro 22:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

The technical definition...OK. Thanks :) Calor - talk 22:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:GWW-shield.png is showing up as a Halloween item for me.  :( Lady Chevon 23:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes that is to do with the server cache, however I would try forcing a re-load in your browser too, you can do it in firefox with ctrl and f5. --Lemming 23:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Raptors

Please see FUCK_THIS_WIKI which is tagged as g5 speedy deletion currently Fall 01:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Yep just blocked him, will delete the page now. --Lemming 01:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Do you think Talk:FUCK_THIS_WIKI should be deleted to? Fall 01:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

It's like you read my mind, spoooooky! :) --Lemming 01:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Man your fast lol :P Fall 01:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

That talk page should not be deleted. Please show me where in GWW:DELETE it gives permission to speedy delete talk pages (that don't fit into any of the categories). The attack page fell under g5, the talk page did not. -Auron 01:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I had seen other sysops delete talk pages related to removed vandalism pages before. No I can't remember any specific examples I am sorry. If I should not have done so, I apologise and will restore it with a 3 day tag. --Lemming 01:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do so. Deleting talk pages that are not hurting anyone serves no purpose. Maybe later you can get related talk pages added into the speedy delete policy, but as of now, it isn't. -Auron 01:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough, I just checked the deletion log and there are a couple of instances where Poke has done it in the past, which is what triggered my impetus. Definitely a subject worth discussing in the policy though. --Lemming 01:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm gonna start a section on that talk page (maybe somewhere else, actually, spamming recent changes with profanity isn't the greatest idea) and ask. -Auron 01:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I think it falls under A3: a page that is incontrovertibly unrelated to both Guild Wars and the Guild Wars Wiki, it has nothing to do with guild wars, and it also links to a page which would never be allowed to be created in the main namespace Fall 01:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately all the A criteria are for articles and do not apply to talk pages also. --Lemming 01:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

But if we just go by wording, G5 could still apply in this case given just the title of the page (which sounds enough like an attack page to me at least) and the fact that the speedy deletion section mentions "Pages" together with "Articles" (which could be interpreted as separated entities, and thus including talk sections into the "pages" definition). Plus, i don't really think many would complain if it's deleted, or am i wrong? :P --Fighterdoken 01:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I added a proposal to this page I hope I did everything correctly, let me know what you think Fall 01:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

(@Fighterdoken) I don't think many would complain if Talk:Mending was deleted, but that's not a valid reason in favor of deletion. Unless the page itself is an attack page, it does not fall under g5. "Fuck this wiki" is crude, but is not attacking anyone. -Auron 01:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Talk Page Deletion

So I can't get my talk page deleted? It's not like its helping anyone by being there. --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!

Sorry Raptors, it's against the policy to delete talk pages. Best you could do is Archive it.--§ Eloc § 02:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok I did that. Thanks Eloc. --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!

Np, you're still banned I assume, or are you just to lazy to login?--§ Eloc § 03:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Still banned :) --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!

And yet no IP ban...very interesting...--§ Eloc § 03:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes Eloc has it right about the deletion, and I think someone has banned the IP account now too, cya later Raptors. --Lemming 17:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Cya later Lemming --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!

Nevermind, I'm back! --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!

Ok...lol--§ Eloc § 02:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

User:Readem NPA Violation

• Here.

Blatant disregard for courtesy, and a very obvious personal attack on Izzy. Drago 03:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Already been banned :) thanks for letting me know though. --Lemming 19:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Block

You seem to be on-line, so I came to you. Check here.--The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Ereanor .