User talk:Lemming64

The archives of Lem Mar 07 - Jun 07 Jul 07 Aug 07 - Sep 07 Oct 07 - Nov 07 Dec 07 - Jan 08 Feb 08 - Mar 08 Apr 08 - Dec 08 2009

Wow...

Thanks. O.0 I'm sincerely stunned... <_< (not in a bad way) -Lena™ talk 22:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Rules are rules after all :) --Lemming 22:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Yea... I suppose so. ;P Uhm, is there a way to see which users are and aren't banned (as a regular user)? If there is such a page, or whatever, I'd be curious to see it. :) -Lena™ talk 22:27, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

There isn't really a list, but you can see Special:Log/block --Lemming 22:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah, thank you very much. -Lena™ talk 22:42, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Actually, there is a list :P Special:Ipblocklist ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 00:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Question, what happens when you're blocked? (not that I'm planning on it, or anything) Can you just not edit, or can you not even see the website? Is there a message? Freedom Bound 17:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

When you try to edit, there is a message saying that you are blocked and it lists by whom and with what reason and you simply can't continue. Looking at the website still works of course. poke | talk 17:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

You can still view source code as well. — Jon Lupen 18:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

That's a lot of violations...

(Block log) . . Lemming64 (Talk | contribs) blocked 70.82.63.203 (Talk) with an expiry time of 12 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) (violation of 1RR: adding prices to minatures, violation of 1RR)

Backsword 01:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The first one is the automatic one, the second one was mine :P --Lemming 01:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

1RR is listed twice. :P — Jon Lupen 03:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey.

I stumbled into a problem. When I was going to check if the in-game f10 redirect link for todays Zaishen Mission (Ruin of Morah) was set up properly, it lead me here. I don't know how to fix it... Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. -Lena™ talk 20:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Enter the url for the Game link and add a ?action=edit at the end. For example: http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Game_link:Quest_1000?action=edit. Then you can edit it. poke | talk 20:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

How do I find out the game link? -Lena™ talk 20:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

I still can't find it anywhere... -Lena™ talk 20:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

When you follow the in-game link, the redirecting url is appended at the end of your browser's location bar, it is urlencoded (with lots of % symbols), but you should be able to read the "Quest_<num>" out of it. poke | talk 21:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Or you can check recent changes, change the namespace filter to "game link", and find the one you want. -- Brains12 \ talk 21:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

looks like everyone has answered it already. --Lemming 21:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Yessir. -Lena™ talk 22:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi.

can you please make my user page come back. when i try to revert it says conflicting edits. thank you, lemming 64. --W a f f l e z 21:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I put it back to your last revision before the blanking. You can find earlier revisions by looking through the "history" tab. -Auron 21:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

thank you. also when will my bf be unblocked. i came on here specifically because you said "I have a good mind to ban you right now for personal attacks until she posts something to say to the contrary that it was an in-joke". i proved him right that he was not personally attacking me. please live to your end of the word as my bf has done for you when he told you the truth about it all. --W a f f l e z 21:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

On reflection to be honest the way I see it is that it doesn't matter if it was a joke or not, it was a personal attack and it wasted a lot of peoples time investigating and dealing with. The ban stands from my point of view and should be a lesson that if you want to joke about this stuff, do it somewhere else. --Lemming 21:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

wow! so you are going to straight out lie? it was not a perosnal attack A PERSONAL ATTACK IS ONE WHERE SOMEONE FEELS VIOLATED ON A PERSONAL LEVEL. i was in no such way violated. this is unbelievable!! how can you seriously lie like that do you have no remorse? you have no self respect, lemming64. --W a f f l e z 21:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I think I want some of whatever you are taking Wafflez... you don't seriously think the community is going to view comments like (removed all traces of my pathetic cheating ex gf off my page) and "Now I'm not sure what to do with you being pregnant. The moment that sucker comes out we're getting a DNA test done. If it's mine.... IF... I'll let you come back home." that you yourself removed from your talk page with the comment "<personal attack removed>" as anything other than direct personal attacks? Yet as soon as it comes up for admin review you both start claiming it was all a big joke? It just doesn't fly anymore. Your personal drama and headgames with each other need to cease on this wiki, and you have both been told that in the past by multiple people. now just give it a rest. -- Wyn 21:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) I am not sure where you get your definition of personal attack from, you could be racist to someone and they could not care but it doesn't stop it being a personal attack. I am sorry if you feel misled but I don't see how it affects you if he is banned from the wiki for a week. If he has an issue with it then I suggest he emails one of the other sysops or a beauracrat to appeal the decision, because I have made mine. Thank you --Lemming 21:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Frankly, even if Lemming were to remove the block, I would personally reinstate it. Lena utterly disregarded a series of warnings that his posts on your talk page were disruptive, even after he was flat out instructed to take those kinds of comments elsewhere. This has gone well beyond the point where it matters what excuse you have to offer for Lena's behavior; as Lemming points out, joke or not, it's disruptive. I can only hope that, for his own sake, Lena isn't stupid enough to think that trolling is gonna accomplish anything and that he learns from this block. *Defiant Elements* +talk 21:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

the fact that you directly disrespected ME is more than enough of a reason to be pissed at you lemming64. you wasted my time to come onto wiki to tell you i did not take it as a personal attack and try to change the fact that you lied by saying "OH OOPS CHANGE OF HEART". how convenient it must be. sysop power abuse. that is all there is to it. also, be careful. i was just told by my boyfriend "just how much he is going to fuck up this wiki with proxies 'cause he is sick of their pathetic bitch asses and their biasm and lies". in all fairness i am telling you ths because this could have all been avoided if you did not lie to him and me. so. i am telling this to you as a respectful user of this wiki and merely relaying the message to you. good luck with him... i think you will need it. if my opinion matters i would say what all is to come could have been avoided if lemming stood true to his word... this will be... interesting... here come the wiki wars. >_< --W a f f l e z 21:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) This could have been avoided if you both kept your games off the wiki in the first place. Don't put this on me, he only has himself to blame. I have to say "sysop power abuse", where have I heard that song before. Oh and threats will get you nowhere. --Lemming 21:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I say let Lena bring it on, it's all just more food for the Arb Com. It's a direct display of his general disrespect for this community and the policies that govern it. Then he will not only face a one week ban, he will face an arb com injunction. -- Wyn 21:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

no, lemming. all of you people (wyn, lemming, defiant [not so much defiant, she/he has not been on my bf's talk pages to my knowledge]) seem to not be able to ease off my boyfriend and harrass him when he and i are playing together. we were hurting NO ONE. ESPECIALLY since it being on our own respective PERSONAL TALK PAGES. if you can not see this then you have my most respective pitty.--The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Wafflez (talk).

I don't think you understand, it is not -your- personal talk page, it is a very public platform which arenanet allows you to use and we are entrusted to moderate. --Lemming 21:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

The wiki is NOT a place for your personal "games," take them elsewhere. — Jon Lupen 21:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Alright Wafflez, you've had your say, and it's pretty obvious that you're not gonna convince anybody, at least not if you continue to post along these lines. Take Wyn's advice and drop it before you get banned/Lena's banned is lengthened for sheer stupidity, if nothing else. *Defiant Elements* +talk 21:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

ban me? for what? what have i violated? you're going to biasdly extend my bf's ban and also ban me because lemming64 lied about lifting his suspension? on a side note, as a sysop you need make it a practice to indent accordingly, defiant. i fixed it for you. thanks. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Wafflez (talk).

(Edit conflict) As a user Wafflez, you need to learn to sign. You can do this by using 4 ~'s, or pressing the button that looks like a signature above the edit window. I (and the person who ec me fixed it for you. thanks. ~PheNaxKian Talk 22:09, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

wafflzes does NOT have to sign. it is not policy. keep doing your thing, wafflez. ignore these arseholes, they are all admin-power abusers. and as proof- look how they just biasedly banned with the reason "Sysop power abuse a.k.a. sit down, shut up, and do what the IRCabal tells you to do, a.k.a. take a day off and calm down please". so pathetic on our wiki's admins part --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:66.190.83.208 (talk).

much butthurt and drama going on today? --Cursed Angel 22:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) hey look a policy that says to sign talk page comments. The admins gave ample warning to stop posting, but wafflez continued to do so. The ban reason was an obvious joke. ~PheNaxKian Talk 22:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC) hey look I signed my comment!

iP is correct. Policy directly states: " This policy defines when and how signatures should be used and to be kept reasonable; it does not dictate that signatures must be used. It is important to note that unsigned comments are treated the same as signed comments." --Jonnieboi05 22:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) This wikia is really going to hell lately with the admins doing all of this to people. Makes me wonder if I should even attempt to post on here anymore 'cause I might be next for some random reason. I support Wafflez and Lena in this scenario, it's all so messed up. My $.02 on the matter is that Lemming should honor his end of the bargain and leave Lena unbanned (this means you, Defiant [and other admins] :P)--Jonnieboi05 22:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/member.php?u=65183 oh, hi there -FireFox 22:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm truly amazed that a sockpuppet has the same opinions as the banned user in question, truly, amazed. --Lemming 22:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

that is so downright pathetic it should be banned a month due to fail. ^^ --Cursed Angel 00:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Uchiha Lena

I think you might want to look at Guild Wars Wiki:Arbitration committee/2009-06-19-User:Uchiha Lena. Tanetris seems to have declined the case to defer to your judgement. I thought you might want to know, since I have interpreted your post at Guild Wars Wiki:Sysop discretion log as implying that you are neutral to or weakly supporting arbitration. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

My intention was not to supersede the arbcom but as Tanetris has pointed out, and I agree, it doesn't really seem necessary at this point. However I would have supported any injunction that was decided in that case, whether it agreed or disagreed with my analysis of the situation. --Lemming 07:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

this

Looks like you need to tag more than one place for discussion. And possibly be less of a .... DrogoBoffin 20:58, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

It's a simple request, you are not an admin, and doing what you just did makes other uses think they can discuss their too, and then we get the kind of dilution on their that we used too. --Lemming 21:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Other people were discussing there before I did that. You only tagging certain places makes it look like your only after certain people. DrogoBoffin 21:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

That just happened, there is some in the discussion above granted, but that was some days ago now and I missed it at the time. Plus by me posting it there it covers both discussions really. Stop playing the martyr when you are in the wrong. --Lemming 21:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Martyr you sure you know what your talking about. Yes I did discuss but my "discussion" was me helping by letting the sysops know that the image was indeed the Playboy Bunny complete with bowtie. So it may have been a discussion but it wouldnt be a copyvio without the bowtie. DrogoBoffin 21:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

To be honest the entire thing shouldn't have been on the admin noticeboard but simply just tagged and any discussion put on the talk page for the image if you want to split hairs. As for your comment it was irrelevant as I think any admin can use google images and check themselves (or have a look in the bedside drawers and check on a cover), so what you were saying was not much different that posting against a vandalism ban request, saying "yes I think that user should be banned, they are vandalising". --Lemming 21:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

"or have a look in the bedside drawers and check on a cover" <-- So sad.

Ever heard of humour? --Lemming 21:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

humour You english are a strange bunch. Or are we the strange ones? DrogoBoffin 21:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Armour, Humour, Colour, the list goes on of stuff that the English spell correctly :p --Lemming 21:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Yeah the American English DrogoBoffin 21:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Wafflez' ban

Was Wafflez actually involved in any serious misconduct on the wiki? The entry at the sysop discretion log seems to imply that she was blocked primarily for siding with Uchiha and asking for him to be unbanned. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 07:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Wafflez sent many emails via the email user function, some of which were pretty bad. In one of the messages to me she basically threatened that if I didn't unblock Lena, he would proxy and vandalize the wiki and I'd be sorry.

On-wiki, Wafflez and Lena pulled the stupidass stunt on her talk page (where they pretended she was pregnant or something) and made a lot of drama about it. That was one of the last straws iirc. -Auron 07:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I'm also not entirely convinced that Wafflez isn't just a sock. Several of the emails to sysops were written in a style similar to Lena's, which means that, even if the account isn't his, he still has access to it. -Auron 07:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

As Auron said she sent many emails to sysops which are very much in Lena's writing style that were incredibly abbusive. here is a small section from the one I received threatening me with physical violence.

"consider yourself lucky. my boyfriend would beat your ass to near death if he got the chance. he hates you to death and i agree with him on everything he says about you"...

As stated on the discretion log my reason for banning wafflez was: "Wafflez is his alleged girlfriend and is at best a meat puppet and at worst a sockpuppet. " I stand by my decision. --Lemming 08:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Good laughs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhpXYjmYbrI&feature=related

talks about you in it...

also very funny --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Farsite (talk).

wtF? --Lemming 17:10, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Out of curiosity, do you know Grogs? He and I GvG'd together in [pure] before Aion came along, and a Lemming came up in conversation as a possible guest, so I was wondering whether or not it was you. King Neoterikos 08:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Nah it isn't me. --Lemming 17:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

HAPPY THANKSGIVING!

Have a good one. May your turkey be hella moist. Drogo Boffin 15:24, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

What is this thanksgiving malarky? I am English dammit! --Lemming 21:17, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Something they fuss about over in the colonies, nothing to worry about, old chap. -- pling 21:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

It is a useless holiday that everybody should embrace. Even you weird english people. Drogo Boffin 18:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey

You have to bump your drama meter to the max, i can hear raptors calling. --adrin 02:41, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

That level will never be reached again. Raptors has become mature :/ - Y0_ich_halt 09:50, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

lol what did I miss? elections or something? --Lemming 10:41, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

you missed the case of the Wynrar - Y0_ich_halt 10:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

User_talk:Wynthyst#GWW:AN - Y0_ich_halt 10:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and this: Guild Wars Wiki talk:Arbitration committee/2009-12-27-User:Wynthyst, Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship#List of current RFAs and Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Wynthyst#Request for Reconfirmation. -- Cyan 10:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!!

Congratulations Lemming64, enjoy =D -- Cyan 12:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

*Gives some Grass to Lemming as a birthday gift* Happy Birthday little thing --MageMontu 12:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Happy Birthday :) poke | talk 17:25, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks everybody! :) --Lemming 21:20, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Gift of the Huntsman Potential Upgrade

I wanted to help moderate the Gift of the Huntsman/Drop rate page. I know the statistics show that this page really does not need any more data - since the probability of getting any item is the same across the possibilities. I however wanted to update the totals and consolidate the duplicate entries. I saw that someone mentioned it would be nice if this page were like Gift of the Traveler/Drop rate, so I went and made a page in my sandbox which models off this page. At User:BOTNGiggles/Sandbox you will see the Gift of the Huntsman data in a table which updates similar to Gift of the Traveler. I have entered the data for the first 5 people from the current data sheet. After looking at my sample, and if you feel this is a good idea - to model Gift of the Huntsman after Gift of the Traveler, I will enter all data in from the current data table to the new data table (in this same process I will consolidate the duplicate entries). Let me know what your thoughts on this matter are. BOTNGiggles 22:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm really not that active at the moment, so it is probably best to ask someone else. Generally speaking though if it makes something better I don't think anyone will have a problem with it. :) --Lemming 18:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Got a question!

Hey! How did you get your tabsheader? Looks awesome! ~Fabian Torrent

Stole and modified someone else's code lol, you are welcome to use it. --Lemming 02:21, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Yo Dog

Merry Christmas! Drogo Boffin 03:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy Birthday 2012

^ 2.223.229.53 10:08, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Sysop rights cleanup

Hello, I appreciate you've been inactive for a fair while, but on the odd chance you've still got your talk page watchlisted/notifications enabled, I thought out of courtesy I would leave a message (admittedly I'm going to copy-paste the same message for all affected users). (1) We're going through a bit of a review of which inactive users have sysop rights (including reconfirmation), and (2) here's a link to yours: Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Lemming64. -Chieftain Alex 19:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

No worries, Thanks for the update. Lemming 17:06, 14 June 2020 (UTC)