User talk:Shard/Dearvandal

That is friggen great. Im gonna start using this. Drogo Boffin 07:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

No I was putting this on the vandals talk page not here but when I edited the vandals page it put it here. Shard fix ur stuff. Drogo Boffin 08:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

I see what happened. This page adds a title, and the "edit this section" goes straight to this page. I should take that out. ~Shard 08:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Yep thats what happens. I also agree. Or manually add the title and then put the dear vandal. Drogo Boffin 08:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

You might also want to subst: it instead of transclude it. -- Wyn talk 08:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

And here is the All Knowing Wyn here to save the day with all of the answers. Drogo Boffin 08:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

I lol'd, anyway nice template :D C4K3 Talk 21:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

It's actually pretty terrible. In my opinion it looks like some butthurt wikinerd who's "trying too hard" to retaliate.

"This is just a copypaste lol" and "not important enough" together with "I don't like ED, plz go vandal there" made me lol. Plz don't use this anymore, vandals laugh the more reactions they get. --Cursed Angel 19:41, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

It's not supposed to get them to stop, it's supposed to get them to slow down. Sometimes, they even waste time vandalizing their own talk page instead of actual articles. ~Shard 07:05, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

includeonly vs. onlyinclude

I thought it was includeonly not onlyinclude? -- Lacky 06:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

They have a difference, but idk what it is. I think it has something to do with categories. ~Shard 06:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Mmkay... -- Lacky 06:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Hax, how does it add your signature? -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 03:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

You're joking right? ~Shard 03:22, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

I actually meant timestamp, but it's hard to differentiate between the two sometimes. Also, it was moving on 1 am so I assumed if there was a shield in my testing there would also be a timestamp. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 14:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)