Talk:Touch ranger
From Guild Wars Wiki
[edit] GWW:CONTENT
From the GWW:CONTENT page: "...we retain all content that documents or describes current mechanics, terminology, game play, skills, equipment, strategy, and canon..."
I therefore am requesting we keep this page as is since it is a strategy that involves skills and is shown as such. A limited number of skills may be in use thus making it resemble a build article but it is commonly seen and current (more of a guide and how to play a strategy or defeat it). I see no reason to eliminate this article as there is no reason to delete it either. --
Vallen Frostweaver 02:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP. A Touch Ranger is still a valid build and terminology used by players. Touch Rangers are still widely played in AB and I even use a Touch Ranger build to farm. josəph 18:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's a legitimate build worth keeping. I don't have one myself (might invest in the equipment later) but it works fine. Just because people get killed by it all the time doesn't make it unfair. Vanguard
18:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- The issue is the sections on build and if this is to be interpreted as only applying to specific builds or all information in some way related to builds. Backsword 18:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh I see, perhaps it should have it's own "common useage" part in the ranger page? Vanguard
18:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh I see, perhaps it should have it's own "common useage" part in the ranger page? Vanguard
- The issue is the sections on build and if this is to be interpreted as only applying to specific builds or all information in some way related to builds. Backsword 18:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's a legitimate build worth keeping. I don't have one myself (might invest in the equipment later) but it works fine. Just because people get killed by it all the time doesn't make it unfair. Vanguard
[edit] Originator
I find the subject of the creator of this build questionable, as it is highly possible (and, in fact, what I personally suspect) that one would just say they made it. Shall we either come to consensus on this point, or agree that this is equivalent to vandalism? I am, of course, referring to line 1 at this point in time. Chaiyo Kaldor 01:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Whoever they are they sure do have a touching mania. Seriously, touchers suck (NPA to anyone, but it's true). They do have counters, but the only counters you'd see on somebody's bar in pvp are diversion and hex-based snares. Ninjas In The Sky 10:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- hello, my name is dshot 68.54.150.61 20:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, mine is blocking skills in Expertise. Ninjas In The Sky 09:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- On top of that a mesmer with Diversion alone still loses. Yeah, blocking AND IMS stances are often forgottoen by a Toucher's foe as Plaguesending against Crippling is. Kinda non-OP UB, if you'd ask me. Noctarch 11:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- For all it's suckness i found Warrior's cunning coupled Dwarven Battle Stance (once you remove the blind he trows at you) is a sure way to nail toucher down. In AB after fight or two with me they won't go anywhere near my party.77.70.60.74 18:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Warriors's Cunning AND Dwarven Battle Stance? Then you take on the role of the one left alone (with no energy by the way). Noctarch 01:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- On the contrary Dwarven Battle Stance is very good offensive skill versus anything & a zealous hammer is enough to provide you with ample supply of energy. Also apart from those two my bar is adrenal so no problem with energy.77.70.60.92 19:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Warriors's Cunning AND Dwarven Battle Stance? Then you take on the role of the one left alone (with no energy by the way). Noctarch 01:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- For all it's suckness i found Warrior's cunning coupled Dwarven Battle Stance (once you remove the blind he trows at you) is a sure way to nail toucher down. In AB after fight or two with me they won't go anywhere near my party.77.70.60.74 18:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- On top of that a mesmer with Diversion alone still loses. Yeah, blocking AND IMS stances are often forgottoen by a Toucher's foe as Plaguesending against Crippling is. Kinda non-OP UB, if you'd ask me. Noctarch 11:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, mine is blocking skills in Expertise. Ninjas In The Sky 09:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- hello, my name is dshot 68.54.150.61 20:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

