User talk:Drago/Archive 3

Archiving

I re-added the text you removed when you re-archived User_talk:Drago/Archive2#Quest_placeholder. It is against policy to remove any comments made on any talk page. In the same section, it states to bring a discussion back to the talk page and not to comment in a user's archive. Blastedt was well within his rights and your suggestion above, while it is your preference, is not policy and thus if a topic should be brought back from your archive for further discussion, it can be. — Gares 14:53, 17 May 2007

This is my talk page. It is not in the general namespace, and if something I see has been resolved, and no longer needs my insight, I will, and can, archive as I please. - Drago 15:56, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

Yes, this is your talk page and yes, it is not general namespace. However, all user talk pages fall under the GWW:USER policy. It may be beneficial to read that policy. This is not about you archiving topics, as stated above, it is about the fact that if a user feels a topic should continue, they can bring that topic back from your archive to your talk page. You can archive it again after the topic has been resolved. As I said before, your comment at the top of your talk page telling others that they are not permitted to remove archive chat is not your decision, it is your preference. If you feel that this is unfair, feel free to discuss changing the Guild Wars Wiki:User page#User talk page restrictions. Policy overrides your preference in this matter. Read the first line of the policy section, "Your talk page should generally be treated like any other talk page in the wiki, even though it is part of your user space." I ask that you abide by the policies used on this wiki. In this case, not removing other's text (you will see I re-added the text you removed) and understanding that a topic can be brought back if it is appropriate. — Gares 07:54, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

show preview

use it ! :P --Lemming64 20:06, 19 May 2007 (EDT)

Was it really necessary to use my talk page? We're on vent for gods' sake. - Drago 20:07, 19 May 2007 (EDT)

I was making a point. --Lemming64 20:08, 19 May 2007 (EDT)

about Guild:The_Chaos_Theorie

Guild:The_Chaos_Theorie
what need I to change? Thanks--Nizu 01:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I would suggest you add english translations to your guild page, as this is the english wiki. As it is stated on the /help window, in game. Also, I don't believe your allowed to have those banners on your guild page. :P - Drago 03:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

sorry but it's the Official Wiki wiki.guildwars.com and I Think that every nationality can be here? becose if i type /help at a Germanchannel i get the help meny --Nizu 03:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

The english wiki is http://gw.gamewikis.org/ --Nizu 03:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

This is an English language wiki, and a beta. Arenanet has stated that if this one is successful they will look into getting other languages their own wikis too. - BeX 04:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

---

Your logic is right, but the answers you come to are wrong. This is the english wiki. Additional language wiki's under this domain have yet to be created. And in the help menu, it clearly says, Beta, English Only. So I would ask you to at least put an english translation after a / or something. I have nothing against other languages, but this is, the official english wiki. - Drago 04:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

kk will be macke in next time--Nizu 04:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

I don't know what you did but now the boxes line up propperly. Thank you. DBZVelena | (Talk page) 21:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Actually, all I did was capatalize something. The coding was all you. - File:Drago-sig.gif Drago 21:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks anyway. I'm just a template user ^_^;; DBZVelena | (Talk page) 21:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Redbetter tags

I removed the redbetter tag you left on Xunlai Guild as the tag is intended for pages that offer no information on the topic in question, and thus are no different from not existing at all. If the page in question offers even a bare minimum of information, it should be tagged for cleanup, expanded, or be tagged with a regular deletion tag for another reason. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 20:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

HELLO

Just saying hello. ---White Wasabi 01:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup?

May I suggest, when tagging a page as needing clean-up that there be some sort of details about what is needing clean-up? My guild's page, which I created and maintain, was flagged as needing clean-up, but when I reviewed the given Formatting page, everything appears to be within the given guidelines. Skeeve2010 05:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

You're probably right - aside from the colors in the contact information (my eyes, they bleed), everything looks good there. I'm not sure there's a formatting guideline that forbids those glaring colors either - but it doesn't really look good, so you might want to change it anyway =\ MisterPepe talk 05:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Well, I tried to make the colors of the officer/leader listing co-ordinate with the colors on our cape, but honestly, the colors are still up in the air. I've tinkered some, and perhaps I should lighten the dark backgrounds a bit more. I still want to have some link to our cape colors.... :-? Skeeve2010 05:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I played with it a bit, take a look and let me know what you think. If you don't like it, feel free to revert the changes I made. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 05:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Category Professions

Hi there, just noticed that the Category:Profesions has a link to one of your own pages. So I removed the category reference from your following page: http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User:Drago/Rayne_Amazonia

Or are you actually the 11th profession in the game??? ;) Gode Fridus 14:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I am the Drago, the BEST profession in the game. :D - File:Drago-sig.gif Drago 14:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Your vote

I noticed that your name was put down as a vote by the ip 216.73.66.42. It would be great if you could confirm that this is indeed you while logged in. --Xeeron 15:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

definately

fo sho Shinjinbukai 23:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)