Feedback talk:User/Gah My Name Cant Fi/Report Option for Griefing
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
griefing is awesome and should be kept in the game. --Super Igor 19:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Telling someone that their build is bad? Sounds very much unlike ANet (who themselves think a Hamstorm build is good). How would you judge a bad build? Moo Kitty 19:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC) PS: Soul Reaping
- I don't mean that the players with bad builds should be banned immediately! No, Anet would review chat logs and see if these people intentionally put on a bad build to cause annoyance. As for how they would tell whether a build was "bad" - well, it should be rather obvious if it's intentional. --Gah_ 19:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, because Defy Pain warriors and Healing Hands warriors differ how...? Apart from wasting an elite on a useless damage mitigation, you can't actually expect people to realize their builds are bad if they're running them in RA. For people who are doing it on purpose, shit, let them have their fun. Owait, GW is too srs bsns for fun. Let's build wars instead. Moo Kitty 19:46, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- RA is the home of bad builds, If you dont like bad builds go to TA, or HA, or GvG... What is real griefing is people who heavily insult those who are using bad builds. The only build style that should be bannable is one designed/played to help the enemy team... for example a monk with heal area who runs up to enemies and spam heal area on them Talamare 20:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- What he means is people who bring Life Attunement and put it on damage dealers that they have no intention of healing. Also he means people who use Unyielding Aura then remove it when they finish casting. Also he probably means people who have incomplete skill bars. He does not mean people that are noobs and just don't know it yet. Wretched90 16:15, 8 September 2009 (CST)
- RA is the home of bad builds, If you dont like bad builds go to TA, or HA, or GvG... What is real griefing is people who heavily insult those who are using bad builds. The only build style that should be bannable is one designed/played to help the enemy team... for example a monk with heal area who runs up to enemies and spam heal area on them Talamare 20:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, because Defy Pain warriors and Healing Hands warriors differ how...? Apart from wasting an elite on a useless damage mitigation, you can't actually expect people to realize their builds are bad if they're running them in RA. For people who are doing it on purpose, shit, let them have their fun. Owait, GW is too srs bsns for fun. Let's build wars instead. Moo Kitty 19:46, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
There would be no way for them to monitor this w/o being unfair. Some people are just bad at the game (look at how many people in RA still use Healing Sig w/Frenzy) and could end up banned unfairly. There's just no way to do this w/o risking some pretty big problems. Karate Jesus 21:17, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- K, I've removed the "bad builds" clause, I'm now only considering the builds which specifically help the other team (Heal Area spammers, Teinai's Crystals with 0 earth, Life Attunement, etc.). --Gah_ 20:07, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Just like you're other report suggestion, this could be abused. And with the flood of abuse the likelihood of Arena.net checking chat logs to thin out those who are actually "greifing" or not is probably slim. [Btw, lawls @ Moo Kitty :)] Magic Talk 23:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps some suggestions on making PvP versions of certain skills so that they can't be abused in PvP? Seryu 13:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Just like you're other report suggestion, this could be abused. And with the flood of abuse the likelihood of Arena.net checking chat logs to thin out those who are actually "greifing" or not is probably slim. [Btw, lawls @ Moo Kitty :)] Magic Talk 23:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)