Guild Wars Wiki talk:Requests for adminship/LordBiro/Archive 1

Well, looks like Biro is pwning in his reconfirmation :P — ク Eloc 貢 21:47, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

To vote oppose here is to admit you fail. Lord of all tyria 21:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

/fail for skakid it is. Lord of all tyria 21:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

LOL, have to agree! -- Salome 00:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Lol at those opposing votes xD poke | talk 22:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Trolls FTL... — Galil 22:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Galils FTL -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I really have to agree with you this time Brains. Look at my last 4 contributions before these two.... — Galil 22:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Responses to votes

• Oppose. Broke the user page policy — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 21:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Woh, once? So you oppose his whole adminship. RT | Talk 21:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm fairly certain that this is sarcasm. Lord of all tyria 21:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Nah, I have been found out :( No muffins for me! LordBiro 22:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

That's not even breaking the policy :p. --Lemming 00:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Nah biro, you can still have muffins! *passes Biro secret muffins!* -- Salome 00:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Once a violator, ALWAYS A VIOLATOR. — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 01:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

• Nay to muffins, yea to wiki. -- ab.er.rant 06:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

  Nay to muffins?! I'd understand if you wanted to vote oppose you know ;) LordBiro 08:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I can has muffin? \/ MiraLantis 22:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Cookies > Muffins anywayz

I haz cookies. Want one? --  (CoRrRan / talk) 22:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I believe this reconfirmation will fail due to lack of arguments supporting to the user in question compared to the strong arguments against :) Calor 22:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Supporters fail at argumentation by definition(?). :-) --  (CoRrRan / talk) 22:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I can has cookie? MiraLantis 22:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

U NO HAZ CUKY!!!! Calor 22:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Peeeeeeease? MiraLantis 22:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Last time I looked, Anja stole my cookie jar: go ask her. --  (CoRrRan / talk) 22:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

And I'm in contradiction to myself. Yay! --  (CoRrRan / talk) 22:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Or perhaps she did that in between my first edit on this page and the one @ 22:43... --  (CoRrRan / talk) 22:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Contradictions ftw. You're well on your way to being a successful and rich politician, but hated in the eyes of the average citizen. Calor 22:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I guess I ask for muffin then. MiraLantis 22:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

You're a hard one, Cor. Not like that softie Biro. (who can't take subtle hints, BTW.) Backsword 22:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't get the hint either, do I get a cookie now? ;-) BTW Mira: muffins leave you with nothing but a craving for more cookies. --  (CoRrRan / talk) 22:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

More cookies? MORE Cookies! I not can has one! MiraLantis 22:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC) ....And wait, you're the offering cookies... I don't have any... am I supposed to? MiraLantis 22:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

You can have cookies, but you'll have to go harass Anja, she haz my cookiejar. --  (CoRrRan / talk) 22:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

But.. the cookie jar is empty for months! You should get on IRC more often and refill it! poke | talk 23:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

You ate it all... again...??? o.O --  (CoRrRan / talk) 23:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

You're all weird. -- Brains12 \ Talk 23:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

LOL Cor! But I gave it back to Anja, she really needs it! poke | talk 23:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Damn, EC, now I lost my train of thought... --  (CoRrRan / talk) 23:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

She's keeping all her girly stuff in it! — Galil 23:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

o.O Is that what I found in it... --  (CoRrRan / talk) 23:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

No! >_< - anja 23:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I found Anja! Hey! Can I has cookie, Anja? MiraLantis 07:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Lulz. HEJ ANJA!!!!!!!! DU ÄR SEXIG!!!! LordBiro 07:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

No no no silly. There's no g. MiraLantis 07:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) I found cookies!!! MiraLantis 21:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Corran

doesn't even have 2490 yet — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 22:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

And we put the lower boundary @ 2500 edits, right, right? --  (CoRrRan / talk) 22:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

BTW, thx for counting Skadiddles. --  (CoRrRan / talk) 22:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

You need to remember that every 1 of my edits is worth 20 of everyone else's, Skadid. LordBiro 07:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

RfR

We don't remove sysops for being in active. -- Wyn talk 02:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

I say let the community decide. DrogoBoffin 02:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

The community decided when the RFA page was made- inactivity is not grounds for termination of sysophood. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 04:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

But a failed reconfirmation is grounds for termination of sysophood. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 04:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

I think the contention is more about inactivity being a grounds to start a reconfirmation at all. -Auron 05:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Bingo. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 13:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)