Talk:Soothing

Recharge Time

Dang, is it really 60 seconds? - Elder Angelus 15:24, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Imo, this skill stinks all over. OK, halving adrenaline gain can be pretty powerful, but it only works on warriors and paragons. Plus, the energy cost, cast time and recharge are all appaling. Imo this is one for the "buff" pile. 86.26.90.196 17:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Possibly a party-wide Sympathetic Visage, but have the spirit take damage every time its triggered? Leave the recharge as is, and it won't be easy to abuse it. Guildwarsrunner 20:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Synergy with Infuriating Heat?

This combination might have some merit against melee-heavy groups (think Charr or Stone Summit) - or against hordes of Paragon;-p85.181.191.78 08:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

its not synergy when they cancel eachother out... your party still gets the double but thats no difference to having soothing by itself and your team retaining its normal rate... MrPaladin talk 12:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Dang, my bad - looks like my math was off:-(85.181.190.194 19:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Soothing Images

Isnt this skill related to Soothing Images?EDIT-forgot to sign in.=P--Ultima Flames 23:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Since no1 has replied i will add anyway. Feel free to remove if u think its not supposed to be there.--Ultima Flames 00:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Soothing Images completely stops adrenaline gain while Soothing halves it. I suppose if we're just using "reduces adrenaline gain" as the relation then they're related. Everything is different except "reduces adrenaline gain" and the name, though. (And the energy cost, if you want to be picky, but that doesn't really matter here.) To be honest I'm not sure whether it's enough, because otherwise there's really absolutely nothing related and the point of related skills is to find skills that serve the same purpose, and these technically do. I'll leave it alone. --[ Kyoshi ]::[ Talk ] 03:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

IH

related, as it does completely the opposite?--83.82.62.210 19:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

You just answered your own question :P 99.238.104.105 04:23, 13 February 2011 (UTC)