User talk:128 176 178 20/body
Blue links ftw :D 128.176.178.20 11:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- HAI IP! Dark Morphon 16:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- We come to bring you cake! --Unendingfear File:User Unendingfear Crane eats peanut.jpg 18:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Greetings[edit]
I would like to invite you to discuss why you would like the note on [1] to remain so we can avoid having a revert war with the other IP. Thanks! Most Japanese Greetings 16:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
wiki note[edit]
I said discuss the note first. The constant edits to that page are becoming somewhat of an edit war which is not needed. Some people are claiming that some programs work better, others are claiming they aren't working at all anymore. Do not change the note until some kind of consensus is reached. At the moment, as the note stands its accurate and none committal either way until we have some finite answer. -- Salome 00:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- affected without a word to is freakingly NOT accurate 128.176.178.20 00:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- It is accurate as their is debate as to in which way these programs are being affected, be that detrimentally or beneficially. -- Salome 00:07, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- it is not accurate try to lern what that means it is just less wrong if it is wrong at all 128.176.178.20 00:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- It is none committal at the moment, thus it's not as accurate as it could be, but as their is dispute at the moment, it's not actually saying one thing or the other, thus meaning that people are not continually changing it to reflect their own views on this. This is a WIKI, we edit by consensus in issues of contention, I hope this helps. -- Salome 00:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- its okay i just wanted to say that its not accuerat :P 128.176.178.20 00:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- It is none committal at the moment, thus it's not as accurate as it could be, but as their is dispute at the moment, it's not actually saying one thing or the other, thus meaning that people are not continually changing it to reflect their own views on this. This is a WIKI, we edit by consensus in issues of contention, I hope this helps. -- Salome 00:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- it is not accurate try to lern what that means it is just less wrong if it is wrong at all 128.176.178.20 00:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- It is accurate as their is debate as to in which way these programs are being affected, be that detrimentally or beneficially. -- Salome 00:07, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- This is a registered user and with you being one. can you change your user page? j/c -- riyen ♥ 00:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- See if you changed your user page. People wouldn't think it was unregistered. Same with talk page. This is only intended for Unregistered users. -- riyen ♥ 01:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- its a test of wittiness i think many admins here dont earn their place i also prefer this because i am a groupie of some one and dont want to be mocked 128.176.178.20 01:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ari, he's a registered user screwing around with people. [2] --RIDDLE 01:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- If admitting to socking. you'd be banned. Please read the policies, etc. -- riyen ♥ 01:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- i like my user paeg its my style i dont threat you for your eye blight of a page please your freaking policies to not edit user pges 128.176.178.20 01:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- oh and im not screwin with people people are screwing with my only because i am like my hero likes me 128.176.178.20 01:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- i like my user paeg its my style i dont threat you for your eye blight of a page please your freaking policies to not edit user pges 128.176.178.20 01:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ari knows that now, and is suggesting that the current content of the page is intended only for use by unregistered users, and thus it's improprietary for the IP to make it so. I disagree; it's a user page. When have we restricted non-offensive, wiki-permitted choices on user pages? Also, 128, meet your forebear. :/ | 72 (U|T|C) 01:20, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) Nah, you're screwing with people. You can deny that you're doing it intentionally, but you can't deny the fact that people are going "Woooooooaaaaaaahhh, an IP with a userpage. +DELETE" --RID
DLE 01:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- 72, there is a precedence with a user who wanted a "you have new messages" banner on his userpage. That was deemed to be disruptive. --JonTheMon 14:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) Nah, you're screwing with people. You can deny that you're doing it intentionally, but you can't deny the fact that people are going "Woooooooaaaaaaahhh, an IP with a userpage. +DELETE" --RID
DLE 01:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- If admitting to socking. you'd be banned. Please read the policies, etc. -- riyen ♥ 01:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ari, he's a registered user screwing around with people. [2] --RIDDLE 01:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- its a test of wittiness i think many admins here dont earn their place i also prefer this because i am a groupie of some one and dont want to be mocked 128.176.178.20 01:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- See if you changed your user page. People wouldn't think it was unregistered. Same with talk page. This is only intended for Unregistered users. -- riyen ♥ 01:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- → moved from User talk:Ariyen
Move[edit]
- → moved from User talk:Ariyen
- 128, please respect the content wiki uses for unregistered accounts and not make that your own. It just confuses people. -- riyen ♥ 01:25, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- ariyen you just feel stupid for being fooled. get over it. 194.44.18.83 01:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Mm, nope, don't feel stupid. I don't hide behind my ip either, unless I forget to login. Don't you feel silly hiding behind numbers? -- riyen ♥ 01:39, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- my ip is out in the open. look me up. if anything, im more exposed than you. 194.44.18.83 01:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- "Ariyen" tells us a lot less about a person than, say, a code leading us to the area they live in. But anyway, if his page is functionally the same as an IP's, and he acts like an IP, why insist he put some other content on his page than a notice that he's a random guy? That notice is in effect for every IP on this wiki and frankly is the best description of this guy for wiki purposes. | 72 (U|T|C) 02:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, IPs are more apt of being hacked into. Course you can find anyone by the information they give, not just location and ip, etc. Location doesn't tell quite so much about a person. Creativity, etc. tells more. -- riyen ♥ 02:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- "Ariyen" tells us a lot less about a person than, say, a code leading us to the area they live in. But anyway, if his page is functionally the same as an IP's, and he acts like an IP, why insist he put some other content on his page than a notice that he's a random guy? That notice is in effect for every IP on this wiki and frankly is the best description of this guy for wiki purposes. | 72 (U|T|C) 02:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- my ip is out in the open. look me up. if anything, im more exposed than you. 194.44.18.83 01:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Mm, nope, don't feel stupid. I don't hide behind my ip either, unless I forget to login. Don't you feel silly hiding behind numbers? -- riyen ♥ 01:39, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- ariyen you just feel stupid for being fooled. get over it. 194.44.18.83 01:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- 128, please respect the content wiki uses for unregistered accounts and not make that your own. It just confuses people. -- riyen ♥ 01:25, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Policy[edit]
Please read this policy here GWW:SIGN -- riyen ♥ 02:20, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
luzl[edit]
You totally win. Misery 11:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Amusing, the fact that I most often comment with add new section kind of screws with your note thing. Misery 11:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah champ, I can tell you already, that ain't gonna fly. It makes it hard for people to edit existing comments and harder for people to add new sections. People will spazz. Good luck though. Misery 14:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- As miz said, people will spazz. The wee blurb is a hinderence to normal usage of the page, thus unless you can come up with some way other than manually moving the thing every-time someone edits, I don't think the wee blurb will be able to stay. -- Salome 17:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah champ, I can tell you already, that ain't gonna fly. It makes it hard for people to edit existing comments and harder for people to add new sections. People will spazz. Good luck though. Misery 14:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
And here comes the spazz. Told ya bro. Misery 18:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think Miz just called me a Spazz. :( (cries into pillow) -- Salome 18:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- i think i saw a way on User talk:Wynthyst can someone do that? i dont understand that code 128.176.178.20 18:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
While amusing[edit]
"Do not put any formatting on talk pages that make it more difficult for other users to leave messages or that otherwise disrupt communication." (source) Just sayin'. -- FreedomBound 14:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- im workin on it itll stay though 128.176.178.20 14:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)