User talk:DominatorMatrix/Archive2
feeling alright there?
^ -- Wandering Traveler 04:35, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Lately for some..reason. I always manage to revert late and end up clearing the article >.>. Dominator Matrix 04:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Exams.
Good luck. Don't get yourself killed out there. -- Wandering Traveler 01:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, its only Science 24, Math 24, and Cinema Finals. So nothing much :D. Dominator Matrix 01:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Careful there....
Images that are screenshots only get the screenshot tag. Anything else (renders, images, etc.) gets the Arenanet tag. Tagging it with both is redundant :P -- Wandering Traveler 02:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned Image
If you would be so kind as to check the "What Links Here" link in your toolbox before marking an image as orphaned I would greatly appreciate it :) --Shadowphoenix 04:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- The image is unused SP. Plus it was a bug that was fixed. So I see no point in keeping the file. Dominator Matrix 04:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well it is linked to an archive and the contents of the archive may have to be used in the future for some reason (perhaps the bug my pop up again etc.), which is the point of archives. --Shadowphoenix 04:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- I recommend that if you are that concerned about keeping images, you should keep them linked in your userspace, that way they will never appear on the Special:UnusedImages page. -- Wyn 04:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Or use {{not orphaned}} --Kakarot 04:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of that template. Wyn, I was going to add it to Guild Wars Wiki:Not orphaned but I can't seem to load the page. --Shadowphoenix 04:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I personally don't feel that bug report images need to be kept especially after the bug is fixed, and I don't know why not orphaned is broken, but it appears to be. -- Wyn 04:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) That template; as well as making the image used on the actual image page using
[[Media:
rather than the normal[[Image:
; also adds the image to Category:Not orphaned images which is basically the exact same thing as Guild Wars Wiki:Not orphaned. However if I remember correctly you no longer need to add the image to that page since it now uses dpl to auto add/remove images that are in the category I mentioned. --Kakarot 04:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)- There appears to be something wrong with the template, as the category won't load either. -- Wyn 04:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm that's weird as it's been working for quite a while, maybe it could have something to do with what I mentioned on Guild Wars Wiki:Reporting wiki bugs although it's not as likely to be the reason this time around. --Kakarot 04:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- There appears to be something wrong with the template, as the category won't load either. -- Wyn 04:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of that template. Wyn, I was going to add it to Guild Wars Wiki:Not orphaned but I can't seem to load the page. --Shadowphoenix 04:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Or use {{not orphaned}} --Kakarot 04:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- I recommend that if you are that concerned about keeping images, you should keep them linked in your userspace, that way they will never appear on the Special:UnusedImages page. -- Wyn 04:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
picture
why you deleting :( ?<bold>UnFile:Unreal1.jpg Real</bold> 23:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- [1] We can't accept copyrighted images on this wiki. Please choice another one. Dominator Matrix 23:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Tuomas
Why bother to keep such an irrelevant piece of information? I mean, I'm a Nightwish fan, but throwing "There's a famous singer by the name of Gwen Stefani' on the Gwen page is comparable and similarly unbelonging.--118.90.25.192 04:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- No harm in keeping it either. Dominator Matrix 04:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Aside from it being completely irrelevant and just cluttering up the page. But whatever, if you want to keep it then I can live with that :D--118.90.25.192 04:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
bureaucrat election
"Regular editors under a registered account may add one approval vote or one disapproval vote for each candidate by signing their name in the appropriate section on candidate subpages, subject to the conditions listed below:
- A user cannot vote twice for the same candidate.
- A user must have made more than 100 edits (excluding the User, ArenaNet, and Guild namespaces) before this stage.
- Anonymous votes (i.e. IP votes) are not accepted.
- Proxy votes (i.e. helping another to cast a vote) are not accepted.
- Votes from known sockpuppet accounts are not accepted.
- Votes cast before or after this stage are not accepted.
- Voting eligibility cannot be transferred or exchanged."
What is wrong? -- Yullive 19:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- "A user must have made more than 100 edits (excluding the User, ArenaNet, and Guild namespaces) before this stage." Dominator Matrix 19:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, ok, didn't read "excluding".^^ -- Yullive 21:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
vandal
I'd let him do it for now, he's just doing it because I got him banned for I believe 5~7 days in GuildWars, he's also going to Proxy once his Wiki account is banned. Can't find Lemi or Salome to protect it either :/ Baddock
- Should be taken care of by now, and hopefully boredom will reach him. Dominator Matrix 03:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Too Fast :P
I was just checking this in game since I don't have any silly wind prayers unlocked hardley :). --Star Weaver 00:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- :O about the comment or the wind prayers or the comment? (Part of the reason I was slow was I'd left my RC open for half an hour without updating *duh*) --Star Weaver 00:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
cool story
bro. -FireFox 02:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Eh?
As I believe I mentioned on IRC, I'm curious as to how the human mind works. As such, I'm curious as to your thoughts behind this move and would greatly appreciate it if you would drop me a mail. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 04:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
5574 Days
Since this counter has been reset. — Jon Lupen 16:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Was surfing through the Recent Changes..
..when I came across something you set for speedy deletion here. I was just wondering.. what does he mean by "raids". I don't care about the page itself.. I've just never heard the term other then for its basic definitions. :S Was just curious. Magic Talk 04:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Its a group of people coming together to either party, or defeat something. Dominator Matrix 05:04, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
-- |Cyan LightLive!| 11:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)