User talk:Prophet Ascension/1

Hello, Prophet Ascension, and welcome to the Official Guild Wars Wiki! If you need help with anything, please feel free to add a message to my talk page. I highly recommend that you check out the "Welcome to the wiki" page - it's extremely useful as an initial guide. Best of luck and happy editing! --Eloc 02:23, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

Guild Image: Dwecape.JPG

The image you recently uploaded (Image:Dwecape.JPG) does not comply with the Guild Wars Wiki image naming policy and has been tagged for deletion. Please feel free to re-upload the image under a correct name. Thanks, (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 03:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Guru

I agree with you that that person you talk about on GuildWarsGuru bought gold but if that guy didn't buy the gold that would be pretty amazing but probably boting. and i stand beside you that you shouldn't have got banned from the guru just to point out a possibly way for a guy to get 8 sets of fow armor.

Sincerely,

Priestess donut 20:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

User images

Hi and welcome to GWW,If your gonna use images for your user page they need to be uploaded with the name User <username> <image>. For example if i was to upload a image it would be named User Kurd HealMonkey.jpg. Pay attention that is doesnt exceed 100kb.Ive tagged your current ones for delete. If there is anything else you want to know just leave a note on my talk page. Have fun and enjoy your stay ~ Kurd 21:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, echoing Kurd's note. Please reupload ALL your images under more appropriate names. Your images have been tagged for deletion. Please try to conform to our naming convention as it just makes it easier to keep track of which images are used in user pages. Thanks. -- ab.er.rant 04:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

GWW Friends

Sign here if you're my friend.--§ Eloc § 04:04, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Goren is married!?

Thought you might appreciate my theory :P.--§ Eloc § 07:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Guild Image

Hey,your image File:R E V E L A T I O N S cape.jpg has been tagged for deletion as it is incorrectly nammed. Please reupload the image as Guild Your Guild Name Here cape.E.g File:Guild R E V E L A T I O N S cape.jpg, thanks :) --Gummy Joe 22:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

WARNING

Warning, you are in danger of being kicked out of the Devils Whisper Alliance. This is because of low faction. Please raise your faction above 365 to ensure your safety in the Alliance.--§ Eloc § 04:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments on Eloc's RfA

Prophet,

Please reword your support vote without the word "bitches" and without any reference to Defiant Elements. Both are irrelevant to the topic at hand, and at least one is a violation of GWW:NPA. Thanks!

—Tanaric 07:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, sorry about temporarily rolling back your userpage, I accidentally clicked on my rollback button. —Tanaric 07:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

PoA's RfA

You have two votes on the page... may want to strike one of them if you changed your opinion.--Fighterdoken 21:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Could you scratch out the <del>older comment</del>? I don't want to do it, as it looks like I'm trying to control votes. --People of Antioch talk 21:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, did I accidently vote twice? Sure, my bad. Prophet Ascension 21:37, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Cool, thanks. --People of Antioch talk 21:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Admin Noticeboard

Hi, the admin noticeboard is a noticeboard, not a place for discussion. It clearly states :

Do not treat this noticeboard as a talk page - it is not a talk page. Additional comments to a raised issue should only be made if and only if they specifically point out further evidence or arguments either for or against an issue. Do not post general comments here and do not argue about the issue here. Please take them to more appropriate talk pages.

Please do not post unnecessary comments in the future. Thank you! --Lemming 21:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Attacking Lussh/Liche

You're not helping the situation, please avoid speaking to or even referencing the aforementioned user. -- scourge 22:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Yea, stop trolling. - anja 22:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Tell him that. He can't be allowed to do that and not get into shit. Seriously, what gives him the right? Prophet Ascension 22:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, to be pedantic, I think the phrase you're looking for is "good riddance." Riddens is not, in fact, a word. This note brought to you by the Oxford English Dictionary and the letter R. - THARKUN 22:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) Checking historials is a good way of deciding courses of action. Can't really blame you for reverting his blanking (again), but it would have been wiser to just move the content straight to the archive, or ask if it qualified as vandalism for being removed (i mean, trolling it was). Now admins will have to deal with another user-induced rage attack that could have been avoided had you been a little less... quick in fixing the wrongs.--Fighterdoken 22:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Thanks for voting on my RfA. I appreciate you telling all of us what you think. Thanks again, see you around! --People of Antioch talk 17:22, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

User talk:86.193.104.101

Was that really necessary? Also, the archive link needs to be prominent. Calor 01:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

(removed NPA)

Prophet Ascension, please refrain from pointless provocations. -- ab.er.rant 02:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Archive

Hiya, could I ask you to make your archive link avalible and noticable on this talk page. It is a violation of GWW:USER for it not to be shown. If you refuse to do this, you may recieve a stern warning from an admin. Thanks, and Have A Great Day!!!! --Shadowphoenix 02:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I see the archive link and he's not violating GWW:USER as it is there. — ク Eloc 貢 04:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

"prominent link" sums it up. I don't think a dot qualifies as "prominent", but whatever. Maybe replacing it with something random as the "trash bin" from some other user out there?--Fighterdoken 06:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

yes sir e, it is in violation of GWW:USER if the link is not prominent --Shadowphoenix 18:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe the policy should be rewritten to use common words, not words like "prominent". Prophet Ascension 03:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Or give exact definitions. "Prominent" changes in definition from person to person.--Ohnoes 03:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Happy wiki-lawyering. -- ab.er.rant 03:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)