User talk:The Holy Dragons

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Vista-file-manager.png
Archive



so clean![edit]

noez! --Dragon7 cape emblem.pngThe Holy Dragons 23:31, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

GW2Wiki tag[edit]

Can you add them ABOVE the lines of text in the finale section when you add them next time, please? Less white space=good. -- Konig/talk 02:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

srry Konig ^^ I was a bit tired when adding them :P --Dragon7 cape emblem.pngThe Holy Dragons 11:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)


Feedback talk[edit]

it was a Copy paste mistake, I was going to fix it but someone else did so I lost my Archives :P (still gonna fix it now) --Dragon7 cape emblem.pngThe Holy Dragons 11:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Nice[edit]

Fixed the link before I could. Thanks. User DrogoBoffin sig icon.png Drogo Boffin 17:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

np ;) --Dragon7 cape emblem.pngThe Holy Dragons 17:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


so dead...[edit]

it really is... --User The Holy Dragons sig.pngThe Holy Dragons 15:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

What is dead? --'Mai Yi' talk 15:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
my GWW :P --User The Holy Dragons sig.pngThe Holy Dragons 15:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
I could vandalize it if you want. jk I won't And my User page is much more dead than yours. --'Mai Yi' talk 15:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
lol thanks for not vandalizing and I'm afk for now :P (internet connection is acting stupid) --User The Holy Dragons sig.pngThe Holy Dragons 15:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Double sins, order of pain[edit]

In re: TEF's question, "does anyone ever use sin heroes?" and THD's response, "yes, I do" (paraphrased)

So, you find that the sins kill fast enough that survivability isn't an issue? I've been playing with various ideas, but I find that human players have to carefully manage sin builds to make them work and I wasn't sure that one could make sin heroes AI-proof. Can you provide some more details about your team? Where do you find this most effective? Do you have to micro anything? Thanks for the idea.  — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 20:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Aah ok here it is, you know.. I play GW for fun not for the best effect.
I control my heroes by my own hand and the orders necro is me(order of pain,great dwarf weapon etc.)( I won't use this kind of buids on my main(which is a ranger)) ;).
I only use these builds because I've got a nice roleplay story in my head.
Aggain this ''combi'' isn't made for the best effect or most DPS it's just for fun ;) and this is pretty much effictive for almost everywhere.
Like my necro runs gate of madness HM with these heroes with ease (because of wild strike ;) ) heroes will tank and there's a nice damage output.
I hope you didn't expect to much from my little joke build because I just made it for fun. ^^ thanks and possibly a sorry Ernie ;)I hope to see you some more on this wiki.
Yours Sincerely... --User The Holy Dragons sig.pngThe Holy Dragons 21:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Well, that sounds viable to me; the only real criteria of a good build/team is that it's fun (and failing terribly usually isn't fun, so it has to be moderately successful). STo be honest, I wasn't looking for an uber-design; just something I could take out for my own amusement or to show my friends that hero sins can work.
So, this was interesting and helpful to me. Thank you for taking the time to post.  — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 23:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
NP ^^ and GL! --User The Holy Dragons sig.pngThe Holy Dragons 09:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

V A N D A L S[edit]

it seems that there is a spam bot attacking the wiki so says greener here-User Zesbeer sig.png Zesbeer 10:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

lol K, I was getting a little bit annoyed by them :/ but if it's a spammbot reporting has no use thus meanin it'll be a revert war (one-sided)...Thanks--you like that don't you..The Holy Dragons 10:41, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
np, i am sure people will be on the revert war path tomorrow... or greener will fix it which ever comes first.-User Zesbeer sig.png Zesbeer 10:43, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
I'm hoping Greener will fix it XD --you like that don't you..The Holy Dragons 10:43, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
I think for now - they ought to protect all pages that don't need edits like the game updates (old ones) from being attacked. I wish there was a spam task force group or rather a group that only does roll-back on vandals like these ips. I don't think blocking these ip addresses is going to do much good, because each spam edit is a different address and due to that - maybe try to search up the ips on a black list and block em all... or the current ones block the ranges. It's not easy, when some legitimation users might use that ip address, etc. I'm thankful for checkuser on things like that. It's clear to me that the edits are done automatically with a different ip each time. Annoying, but that's just something that can't be prevented too much without maybe hurting a legitimate editor. Kaisha User Kaisha Sig.png 12:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
No dice. We just need to go "pew pew" and the enemy will be like "ugh...you got me!" --Xu Davella 13:15, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
less QQ more pew pew or dice? hmm.. --you like that don't you..The Holy Dragons 13:16, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Bugger. How bashed up does the RC look right now? --Xu Davella 13:29, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


Bye everyone![edit]

C U again next Saturday :S (for a week in Berlin ) --you like that don't you..The Holy Dragons 20:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Im not dead.[edit]

Happy?--NeilUser Neil2250 sig icon6.png 15:20, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

I still don't trust you but it's a start... :P --you like that don't you..The Holy Dragons 15:21, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


yay WoC[edit]

the ministry of purity looks kinda awesome: User The Holy Dragons ministry of purity.jpg --you like that don't you..The Holy Dragons 09:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Sunspear and Soulbreaker[edit]

Why did you revert my additions to those pages? --Santax (talk · contribs) 15:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

I only did the Soulbreaker and it was because it's a scythe and you put spear on the page and you also added slashing damage while it was cold damage (also what was the purpose of your edit?) --you like that don't you..The Holy Dragons 16:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Clarly, the information about it being a spear was an error and easily corrected. And it does have slashing damage, when it is not modded. The purpose of the edit was to add previously omitted official lore to the opening section, and I decided to bring it into line with GWW:WEAPONS while I was at it. --Santax (talk · contribs) 16:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
ok The lore is fine then but we'll keep the cold damge part and the fact it's a spear :P (BTW source for lore? Prima Guide?) --you like that don't you..The Holy Dragons 16:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
It's from the GWN Pre-Release Bonus Pack, on the CD that came with it. --Santax (talk · contribs) 16:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


happy new year[edit]

to everyone! --you like that don't you..The Holy Dragons 23:04, 31 December 2011 (UTC)


para in pre[edit]

fuck logic User The Holy Dragons Para in Pre.png --you like that don't you..The Holy Dragons 07:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)