User talk:Wealedout/Timewastersarchive1

This are topics that wasted my time, they will waste yours. Any comments that are are a little or blatanly wrote to annoy me also those for sniping me, I'll archive them here

Take a look at Auron

I thought you might be interested in these. Link--ShadowFog 03:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

He should report that to NC, isn't that harassment?Abusive sysop indeed. Wow, so he represents all of Guild Wars OFFICAL WIKI sysops?--Wealedout 03:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

No. You're bad. Ever heard of photoshop? Regardless, none of that is particularly abusive - it's just Noxify trying to make bad drama. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 03:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

@Wealedout:::Well, technically he's not an abusive sysop but abusive Guild Wars players which by the way I don't think anyone would like again a sysop that harass players in the game for the next election.--ShadowFog 03:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Leave in-game matters in-game. How does anything said in-game even remotely have to do with wiki related things? Dominator Matrix 03:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Exactly. Noxify shouldn't complain - it's his own fault he took Auron off ignore. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 03:26, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Technicality killed the cat, but saves a lawyer a lot of work. You people can read my user page for future postings and Noxify has his page, yea every wiki user has his page. (Rainbow)The more you know!--Wealedout 03:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

...Your point being? Dominator Matrix 03:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Uh, could you repost that, but make sense this time? -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 03:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

This personal feud needs to get off the wiki, sooner rather than later. If you or Noxify or anyone else for that matter can point to an instance where Auron has abused his position on this wiki as either a Bureaucrat or a Sysop, or has violated wiki policy as a user, then fine, it should be dealt with here. However, as has been pointed out several times now, in-game issues have no relevance here. As for your userpage, and Noxify's userpage, feel free to vent, but any violations of GWW:NPA on this wiki will be dealt with accordingly. And may I add that your statement that he "represents all of Guild Wars OFFICAL WIKI sysops?" is just ridiculous. -- Wyn 06:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

@Wealedout: "This personal feud..." I wonder what kind of statement she refers and how shes interpreting it out. She got a point right, maybe sysops have a Second Life in GW(awful pun), but really they don't represent GW players, they are here just for the wiki, if they did a lot of sysops would have lost their positions long time ago.--ShadowFog 11:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

You know, it's really annoying when you talk about someone as though they're not there. And rude, too. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 16:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Armond's editing your front

Heres what Auron stated: "Shadowfog, stop putting words in my mouth. I never said "hexes are terrible for PvP." I said those specific hexes are terrible for PvP, but they work in PvE because the monsters keep attacking/casting through it. Show me one time where I said hexes in general didn't work in PvP. Since you can't, I'd appreciate if you stopped making shit up. Thanks. -Auron 21:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC) ". Heres the link too. Link. You may want to consult a sysop about a user editing your personal page.--ShadowFog 03:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks ShadowFog. If Armond cared at all he would see your link in the history of my user page, that's just him calling for attention.--Wealedout 03:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

The fuck are you talking about? You posted what was essentially NPA with no proof of any sort to back it up, and I reverted it. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 04:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Nah, it wasn't.--Wealedout 04:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello, this is not a wall of text this time. Please don't be dumb. Thank you for your cooperation. ¬ «Ðêjh» (talk) 01:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

-->"Please don't be dumb..."<--; Stop wasting your time.--Wealedout 14:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Please don't tell other users how to run their life. Thanks. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 14:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't know how you feel about these comments. Here's a link. Read it thoroughly and may say "irony"... let's see if you get that one.--ShadowFog 14:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Lilondra's first

Furzt,Also try winning with a profession that requiresm ore then 7 123 123 123 4 123 8 123 WIN Lilondra *gale* 12:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Lilondra sure knows how to dial a phone.--ShadowFog 13:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Actually i was referring to the skills on youre bar (in this case a WS build) lol Lilondra *gale* 13:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Well it is more like 54 123:

Wounding Strike

Victorious Sweep

Chilling Victory

Whirling Charge

Attacker's Insight

Blank

Blank

Blank

or with more degen

Wounding Strike

Victorious Sweep

Chilling Victory

Whirling Charge

Attacker's Insight

Viper's Defense

Blank

Blank

or

Wounding Strike

Victorious Sweep

Mystic Sweep

Heart of Fury

Zealous Renewal

Blank

Blank

Blank

Vote yes on a Reaper's Sweep rework, legislation number 54123.--Wealedout 17:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Wow you even fail at making a propper WS thats just wow Lilondra *gale* 15:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

You take these thing too seriously. It's a saturday night, there some good movies in the theater and what not.--ShadowFog 04:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

But GW iz srs bsnss and i already pwn ra :( (the key is gale on a warrior rly xD) Lilondra *gale* 13:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

In Armond's words:"the fuck you are talking about". You give your answer in form of a single sentence of trolling, with not at least a minute amount of dedication, so when I answer back your next response would be of that to justify your trolling. Got killed in RA and you had to troll here.--Wealedout 15:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)