Talk:Suxon
From Guild Wars Wiki
[edit] Missing note
A note is missing concerning people who fight for both factions. If I remember correctly they Sux<beeep> Kurd<beeep>ks. Yseron - 90.15.51.21 19:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
...even with the "bleeps", thats still not a very appropriate thing to put on this wiki. (dont call me stupid if i take his post the wrong way, i am using AGF after all..)--
Raph Talky 23:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Suxon My Kurdick [Gulp] — Skakid 23:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
i would think that would break the EULA--
Raph Talky 14:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't.--
Wynthyst 14:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
really, huh....guess im just being to uptight--
Raph Talky 14:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Anet probably would object to it if you reported the guild name, i just don't think anyone has bothered reporting it. -- Salome
14:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion
I knew it would go to this at some time, but users may want to note that this is, indeed, a common term used to refer the faction, same as "wammo" is used to refer any warrior/monk.--Fighterdoken 23:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
true, but doesnt that mean wed also have to include Kurd**k?--
Raph Talky 23:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- We do have a redirect for Kurdick. Requesting currently to Salome to revert her revert on the article, in order to give both factions the same treatment.--Fighterdoken 23:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
you lost me at revert her revert ><--
Raph Talky 23:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- I wasnt aware that this insult note was over here too, as i would have reverted here too if i had of seen it. I am refraining from touching this article in light of your message on my talk page. If you read what i put in my talk page, we can go further from there. As i think we both have valid points. -- Salome
23:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] why redirect?
why not just a have a short definition saying this is an sarcastic name for luxons similar to the imbagon article? --VVong|BA 14:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Because that's already written in the Luxon article in the notes section here. Boogy
(Talk/Contributions) 18:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- seems to me that the suxons/kurdicks nomenclature is of such minor significance that they shouldn't get mentioned in the main article. but whatev. i certainly don't care enuf to argue about it anymore. --VVong|BA 18:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- The average person who searches "suxon" isn't going to bother scrolling down to the notes section on luxon. Lord of all tyria 18:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Fixed. — Skakid 18:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- The average person who searches "suxon" isn't going to bother scrolling down to the notes section on luxon. Lord of all tyria 18:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- seems to me that the suxons/kurdicks nomenclature is of such minor significance that they shouldn't get mentioned in the main article. but whatev. i certainly don't care enuf to argue about it anymore. --VVong|BA 18:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

