User talk:Scourge/Archive5

1st

WUT

YARLY - BeX 08:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

/afk for sushi. :> - BeX 08:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

lol why don't you just marry sushi. -- scourge 12:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Cos it doesn't put out. -Auron 12:10, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Where r u. - BeX 09:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Leave me the fuck alone

http://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=User:Scourge/Sandbox&oldid=623669 — ク Eloc 貢 05:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh my god, I'm so sorry. Let me get right on that! -- scourge 05:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I lol'd — Rappy 05:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, burn. -Auron 06:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

After thinking it over and calming down and playing Guitar Hero and taking some pills, I feel sorry for what I've done...so ya, sorry. — ク Eloc 貢 10:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Fail

Each time u enter the wiki

--Cursed Angel 11:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

A bit late CA, I suppose it took you a while to think that up. A+ for effort though. -- scourge 11:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Tbh, I loled at that. That pic kinda made my day...err evening...err 5 in the morning...ya, that one works. — ク Eloc 貢 11:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Someone

do

something.

- Bex 08:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah that's a negative on the something part Bex, over. -- scourge 10:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Explain, please

Scourge, care to explain why you oppose? I'm curious, that's all. --People of Antioch talk 22:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Poke summed my thoughts up very nicely, "Tagging hundreds of orphaned images for deletion is not really something that qualifies someone for being a good sysop." Until I see any example to suggest otherwise I really don't think you need the tools of a sysop, you rarely contribute to the Admin Noticeboard so you really wouldn't ever need to ban anyone and deleting images can be handled by one of the many other sysops. I think for the moment we have an excess of sysops... -- scourge 22:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, cool! Thanks for commenting! I am pleasantly surprised that that many people signed on and responded. Short of Eloc's RfA though, and I don't mind that. Okay, thanks again. --People of Antioch talk 00:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for voting on my RfA. It has failed, but I appreciate your comments and reasons! Take care. --People of Antioch talk 17:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Comments on J. Kougars Talk Page

Please do not resort to personal attacks. Thanks! --Shadowphoenix 02:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

RfA

"Sadly, we have enough sysops for the moment", I fine this funny *giggles* when many people have said that is a somewhat dumb reason to oppose an RfA. I am not saying u are dumb, I was just pointing out the discussion and your comment and how they relate :D lol --Shadowphoenix 03:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Scourge doesn't care. Thanks for your understanding. -Auroñ 03:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm, I wonder what made you feel the need to say that.... Oh right, I know just to get on my nerves, well u phail :P --Shadowphoenix 14:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

What made you feel the need to come on Scourge's page and say what you did? It certainly wasn't to be nice. - Bex 15:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Well it wasn't to be mean either, I just noticed that he put that on the RfA and pointed out how they related. I really do not care what his reasoning is to oppose an RfA that is his business I was just pointing out how they related. :) --Shadowphoenix 15:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I replied on this page because Scourge asked me to comment. You don't have the slightest idea why I do what I do, and it would be unwise to pretend the contrary. -Auroñ 16:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

FIRST

It is so unfortunate that we met this way... -- NUKLEAR IIV 20:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh wow, this page has been empty for a long time. Second. — ク Eloc 貢 21:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)