Guild Wars Wiki talk:Elections/2008-04 bureaucrat election/Ab.er.rant

Yay

Well a vote for Aberrant is a vote for democracy, cookies, baby seals and kittens and any other number of nice things! Yay Aberrant! -- Salome 15:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

/agree :D --Shadowphoenix 15:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Your the best candidite I've seen so far and you actualy make me want to vote for you becase you're very practicalTall Ash 23:19, 9 April 2008 (UTC) After looking at all the other candidites and their discussions I would give you my vote.Tall Ash 23:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I like kittens. I guess I'd better vote for him. Auntmousie 04:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

No, if you like kittens, you should vote for me! :P Lord Belar 23:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I dont know if i have the 100 contribs requirement, but if i do, you got my vote, gl!--Raph Talky 23:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

From my count you have 95 in the main and talk alone as well as at least 7 in the GWW/GWWT sections so you should have enough contribs to vote Raph. --Kakarot 23:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thats good, as i am natuarlly too lazy to check myself :P Thanks Kakarot :D--Raph Talky 13:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

He is a good enough person, I dont see why he cant be elected, with the support of all these people, I have to give him my vote.

For Ab.er.rant! --Burning Freebies 09:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Concerns

Ab.er.rant is a great sysop, a great editor, and an all-around great guy. That said, he's often seemed to suffer from communication problems, both making himself understood and understanding others. I'm concerned that this is going to be more of a problem in a bureaucrat role, so while there are certainly worse choices, he's not my first choice either. Just my personal opinion; take it as you will. - Tanetris 00:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

That post is somewhat surreal in my eyes, since that pretty much describs the problem I see.. with Tanetris. Backsword 00:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Kinda have to agree with Backsword on that one. -- Salome 09:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Honestly, in my opinion, Aberrant is one of the few on wiki that actually does just the opposite. :) - anja 09:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Question

Out of interest, does your reason for accepting this nomination remain the same as before? *Defiant Elements* +talk 14:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I believe so. I don't particularly want to be a bureaucrat, but I won't decline the nomination (especially one from Dirigible and supported by Tanaric) because I'm willing to try to be one. By "want", to clarify, I mean I have no strong desire or wish or even hope to be one. Yet it also does not mean that I would do it reluctantly or half-heartedly. You can call it apathy (on the outcome) I suppose. I'll take it as it comes. -- ab.er.rant 17:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Not a bad take on the situation. I wouldn't decline one myself, even though I wouldn't know exactly what to do with Bcrat. Hell, I still don't know what the hell they do.- Vanguard 13:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Commentaries

→ moved from Guild Wars Wiki:Elections/2008-04 bureaucrat election/Ab.er.rant as per GWW:ELECTIONS

Support

gl!--Raph Talky 00:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Of course, a vote for aberrant is a vote for all things good and logical with the world! -- Salome 00:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

For the people! At least most people. Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 00:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Comments here are too down-to-earth for me to oppose. -Auron 00:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

most definitely. -- Wandering Traveler 00:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Ooh, democracy!! Great, let's taste that. So why Abe.r.rant? Well, mainly because he is nearly the only one who seriously prevented me from foobaring the wiki with my absurd categorizations. Indeed, he is really annoying. So, if he is a bureaucrat, he will no longer be able to arbitrarily delete my pages. I will be free at last! Mwhahahaha. (hmm, hope I didn't misunderstood what a bureaucrat actually does) - MORTUIЯUS 14:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

Only weakly. Reasons can be found in preceding elections. abby for sysop, not bcrat! - Y0_ich_halt 15:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)