Talk:Ruins of the Tomb of the Primeval Kings

A what? Ruins of the Tomb of the Primeval Kings! — Skuld 08:02, 10 May 2007 (EDT)

Moving...

I want to move this to the Ruins of the Tomb of the Primeval Kings. There is no record of this name used anywhere, and no such usage among the player base. Any objections? --Karlos 10:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I'd prefer to follow the "Nightfallen X" naming convention, but this set of four areas doesn't have any official name, and I don't object to it being moved to whichever unofficial name is most popular. -- Gordon Ecker 22:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Strong support, no-one except Gordon seems to use this name. — Skuld 16:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

In a year of Tomb runs, I've never heard anyone call them more than "Tombs". Guess lazyness wins. Tomb of the Primeval Kings would be used for the outpost you start in.Backsword 20:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

That goes for the claim the it's often called the new underworld. Seen that claim often, but never anyone actually doing it.Backsword 20:12, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

And, 20 months later, he changed it :D --snograt 00:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

BP nerf

Due to the recent update preventing pets from leaving corpses, the BP team build for tombs, the only one I ever see people using, is going to go down the drain. The whole idea was to use the pets to get corpses...Ashes Of Doom 01:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Guess people will have to start not sucking to farm them 2k greens. Harsh life when you can't gimmick your way through PvE. -Auron 04:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I would add that balanced grps without tanks, nukers and ursan blessing, with full heros/henchs and mesmers can perfectly suceed with a comparable time frame. Screenies on demand for people who think that ANet designed these areas only for barrage rangers or the "for 30 secs((pve) - can be extended to hours) the guild wars skills system does not mean a dam thing any more because you did buy Factions" skill. Yseron - 90.48.0.84 23:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete

So is this a copyvio, and do we delete? calor (talk) 00:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Dug through the history on GuildWiki and can see that chunks of it were contributed by GuildWiki users who did not declare GFDL. So it's safer to just delete it and start over. -- ab.er.rant 00:14, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Redirect?

Why not just add what information is here (that'd be useful) to the suggested merge and then redirect? I don't see a sense in two places being active that have been active for a few years now... Kaisha 20:54, 18 April 2011 (UTC)