User:Briar/Meh (archive)

You're finally unbanned?

:3--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 12:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I have been for a few days now. Wasn't untill recently that i decided to start editing a again. --BriarFlame Me 13:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah, ok. I missed you 3;--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 13:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

And you my Craney Friend. :3 --BriarFlame Me 13:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Awh, thanks :3--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 13:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Do u liek my LolPvE image? I think it is lulzy. --BriarFlame Me 13:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I've run that build with my dervish tbh :>--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 13:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I think its hilarious that a build is so damned effective that litterally any profession can use it and it works. Makes me go rofl. --BriarFlame Me 13:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, I was solo farming hard mode :3--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 13:45, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

XDDDDDD Its so strong and brave!!! --BriarFlame Me 13:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Like frenzy ? :3--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 13:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Its like echomending healsig and frenzy all in the same bar. its so leet. >:D. better talk page spam less or we will get in trouble. O.O --BriarFlame Me 13:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

MSN? 3'; Unendingfear@hotmail.com if so :3--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 13:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

My MSN is all gum'd up. Idk whats wrong with it but its showing me as offline to everyone. Couple of other friends have been having this problem as well. Stupid. >< --BriarFlame Me 14:00, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

We can still talk with it though :3--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 14:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Meh. Gimme a min. ill see if i can get it to work. --BriarFlame Me 14:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't see you as offline. Well, you're one day away now. ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 17:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Next siggy

Master Briar I hope you like it. :3 It's got that picture for a reason ;p--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 17:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Unbanned again, right? :3

Welcome back :3--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 21:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Yep. Till auron pulls another power-move. --Master Briar 21:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah, there's MSN + another wiki at least <_<--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 21:06, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Yep yep yep. --Master Briar 21:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Or you could, like, learn something from it. Nobody cares when a random nobody like you gets banned for the umpteenth time, but people do care when a random nobody helps this community. Koda Kumi 11:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Or you could, like, shut up Koda? Help the community? You aren't serious, are you? Morphy 11:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Koda, go away and let the grown-ups work. Mkay? --Master Briar 15:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I lol'd. You're like 15 something I guess. -Cursed Angel 16:04, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

You guess wrong. No go away please. =) --Master Briar 16:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

You should be thrown under a bus for being shush an autist, CA. Morphy 12:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Your quote.

"Could an omnipotent being create a stone so heavy that even that being could not lift it? If so, then it seems that the being could cease to be omnipotent; if not, it seems that the being was not omnipotent to begin with - Anonymous"

No matter how you look at it it's a lose-lose situation. :( --Strong Like Magikarp 10:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Magikarp is omnipotent. Morphy 12:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I believe this episode of TNG is relevant. MAFARAXAS 13:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Morphy suspects you of redirecting to porn and is therefore not clicking that link. Morphy 14:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I will bravely volunteer to look at the link then! :D--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 14:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

FFFFUUUUUUUUUUU it's not porn ;-; I mean, it's safe <.<--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 14:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

baddies. step 1: look at the link. step 2: google the name of the domain name. memory-alpha is the star trek wiki. MAFARAXAS 20:25, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Ewww star trek, that is actually worse than porn. Morphy 16:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Porn = bad??? D;--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 17:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Depends on the kind of porn. Morphy 12:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I know that waste material porn is bad. What else is? D:--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 15:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

That quote is not so much a quote, its actually whats called the omnipotence paradox. The stone is merely an example. Its a question I pose to anyone that tries to bring their religion upon me (Witness's/mormons mostly). --Master Briar 15:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

That kinda people will usually say omnipotence doesn't include logical paradoxes. I don't really like this argument, a better one is the one with omniscience. If God is omniscient, then all knowledge has always been stored in his mind. That means everything, every idea, has always existed in God's mind for no apparent reason. Not a very satisfactory explanation, I'd say. 83.163.190.111 18:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC) (this is Morphy too lazy to sign in btw)

;p what question? I'm pretty sure you don't tell them about a stupid stone. ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 17:12, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

I think that in practice what'll happen is that the being will create a fucking hilarious big stone, but still be able to lift it. ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 17:12, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The question is how can omnipotence exist? --Master Briar 17:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Thinking a while about that for a while it probably can't. Secular humanism, bitches! <3 ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 17:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Hamsterianity > that. Morphy 12:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Speaking of Jehovah's Witnesses (One of them called me offering a free book just the other day). "I defy you to name one single acknowledged religion that doesnt have a bloodlist longer than the combined kills of every serial killer in the history of america (and i only use america here because with the exception of Jack the ripper im not familiar with any serial killers anywhere else in the world). - Briar 02:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)" Seem like pretty friendly people when they come around. Sardaukar 13:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I sat through a lecture by the son of Jack the Ripper's first victim. He went on a 30 minute rant about how his mother wasn't a prostitute, gingers are amazing and speed is great. *edit* that was the Yorkshire Ripper, never mind.--neshot 13:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

[1] google is your friend. --Master Briar 20:06, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

That site had an obvious bias. Nevertheless, even with that info, they still don’t meet your criterion of having a "bloodlist longer than the combined kills of every serial killer in the history of america". I may have miscounted but I got 17 in that list of articles, some of which weren’t verified, but we can just let that go for the sake of your charge. Now Ted Bundy had 20 verified kills, he admitted to more, and he’s just one serial killer on a long list. Sardaukar 08:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Tbh i dont actually care. I don't really feel like spending my day compiling a blood list of every dead body slain "In the name of our lord". Not my idea of a fun friday night. That was just the first link I found. If you'd like to see more dead people for the sake of an argument as stupid as this one please, by all means, Cross reference jehovas witness and victim. But I don't feel the need to defend a claim that was never meant to be taken so litterally. The point is that more lives have been lost because of Old words in Old books than for any other reason in the history of the world. --Master Briar 09:02, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I just wanted to see if you'd be honest enough to admit you were wrong about the Witnesses. I'm sure you felt you were absolutely right when you wrote what I quoted, so the burden of proof was on your shoulders. No need for me to do any research. Now that you've changed your statement to non-literal, I wonder if you’re the type that just back peddles all the time when someone calls you out. Just curious, because your latest line about "more lives have been lost because of Old words in Old books than for any other reason in the history of the world" is wrong as well. Wars (i.e. non-religious ones, See WW2), diseases, and natural disasters have taken far more lives. Although I’d agree with you wholeheartedly that religion has blood on its hands, the nationalistic and commercial efforts of mankind have laid more life to waste. Anyway, reasonable discussions are to be had elsewhere. Take care. Sardaukar 13:41, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry did you just suggest that Nazi's were non-religious? --Master Briar 19:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, It is not upon me to prove anything to you. Your the one that rolled up in here telling me in wrong about something that was obviously an overgeneralized statement. And Im not entirely sure when the internets became super srsbsns, But i missed the memo and would appreciate you forwarding it to me. While you insist on pissing me off though, i will tell you that quoting old, removed, overgeneralized crap from my page serves no purpose other than to stir shit up and troll me. If you think I removed it for shits and giggles then I'll go ahead and let you know right now, I didn't. I don't post that kinda stuff for shits and giggles. I removed it because I gave it thought and realized that I need to research further into the matter before speaking on it. I realized that it was overgeneralized on my own. But thank you for pointing it out there sir. I truly appreciate it.--Master Briar 20:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

You're right, the internets aren't super serious business. You're perfectly free to act like an idiot if you want. But the burden of proof is still on you, since you made the claim. You can't just say "the sky is red" and expect everyone to believe you because you said it. The same goes for "the earth is 7,000 years old" and "there is a god", by the way. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 20:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

"Wars (i.e. non-religious ones, See WW2"

I suggest you read a history book. Hitler and the Nazis were killing people because they believed they were the chosen ones and nobody else (especially not the Jews) deserved to be on Earth. ~Shard 21:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

didn't stalin kill 60 million people or something? that had nothing to do with religion. –Jette 23:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I suggest you read a history book- WWII != holocaust. – Emmett 00:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I suggest that you're all teenagers or college students, are not history or theology majors, and have done no credible, impartial research whatsoever, and thus have no idea what you're talking about. Stop waxing idiotic and go back to arguing game balance. elix Omni 06:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Their ideology of Arian superiority is still closely related to the causes of the war, the holocaust is kind of a side product. ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 08:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, crusades and terrorist attacks and the Iraq war are just a few examples. Religion had a big deal there. ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 08:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm loathe to get involved with this debate, but just to point out one minor point in regards to Jeohvas witnesses. The religion does dictate that one cannot have a blood transfusion which has resulted in many such people dying from injuries they could have otherwise recovered from. Not saying this in anyway supports Briar's statement (as it doesn't) but just saying that those people could be said to be victims of their own faith. -- Salome 23:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Tbh, if so one is that stupid and dies like that, Salome, I can only say it's a good thing they're gone from the gene pool. =/--/ u /nendingfear File:User Unendingfear Avatar.png 23:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey, maybe that's the secret purpose behind scientology... -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 01:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

More evidence that delusions, ignorance and stupidity kills... social darwinism ftw... >_> --Lania Elderfire 01:12, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

The conclusion from that paradox is logically flawed on multiple levels. Mr J 16:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Remember

That if you use an image in your sig, it must redirect to either your user or talk page. Thanks Reaper of Scythes** 19:03, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Is there a reason for that policy? Koda Kumi 12:53, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

It's really annoying when someone doesn't do it. Also, if the image composes their entire signature, which has been known to happen in the case of rainbow-colored signatures. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 18:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Happy Easter

Hope you have a good one. Reaper of Scythes** 09:04, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

The Deep

Just pwnd it Twice in under an hour. Kanaxai is such a bitch. --Master Briar 09:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I've played the Deep once, finished it 3x in an hour :> ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 09:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

If cons, assassins, or hero's were involved, it doesn't count. =P! --Master Briar 09:56, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Cons where, but that's the only thing :> [2] ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 10:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

So who named the Paragon Porogon? :>--neshot 10:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I see assassins. YOU'RE DISQUALIFIED!!! --Master Briar 10:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Secondary! :< They're warriors who do assassin things, but they're not assassins! ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 10:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

You seem to be under the misguided conception that I disqualified assassins because of Enchantments or Attack chains. No I disqualified them for being able to skip the 5th room entirely. --Master Briar 10:55, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Athrun Feya :> ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 10:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I should have guessed, I've lurked PvX enough to know she likes poros and makes a lot of the high-end PvE builds.--neshot 10:50, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah. I also got those ~20 min runs in her team! :> ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 10:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

That team needs more manly BB. --Master Briar 11:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

what ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 11:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Kanaxai. BB. 4 second KD. Cmon pal you can figure this out..... --Master Briar 11:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

"what" as in "why would you ever". you do realize a KD like that serves no purpose whatsoever to the team? :< ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 12:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

(Reset indent) it serves plenty of purpose it makes it MOAR MANLY!!! --Master Briar 04:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Moved bullshit

→ moved from Talk:Permanent Shadow Form

Okay then. Ill make it very simple for you. you have no good reason' to delete the perma-former from the wiki. It is the single most important PvE build in the game today. Simple enough for you?--Master Briar 02:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Have you yet removed the delete tag and put in the edit summary "I'll clean this up soon"? No? Then why are you still bitching? -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 02:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Because I cant remember the Clean-up template, because I'm tired of people reverting me just because its me because I'm right because its absolutely stupid how much hate this build gets just for being the most effective thing in the blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. Take your pick. Idc really. I'm arguing because you started an argument with me. Don't start arguments with me and I won't start an argument back. Sound good? --Master Briar 03:04, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

You don't need to add the {{cleanup}} template - in fact, if you did, you'd probably have to deal with edit conflicts as other people tried to fix what you were fixing. I doubt people revert you because you're right (especially after the astonishing intellect you've displayed here). No one cares if you're arguing with me, especially myself, and you're just wasting your own time and brain cells in doing so. Did I miss anything? -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 03:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Apparently you do. Because guess what, youuuurrrreee stillllll heeeerrrreeeeeeee!!!! And I think maybe you should take a reading class, Here, I'll help.

"Because I can't remember the clean-up template" - And I didn't. Because its not important and tbh untill its re-written It is technically considered historical content. However, it does not need a deletion tag. Because while it is very full of misinformation in its current state, it is still very much alive and very much a part of guildwars. Following me so far?

"Because I'm tired of people reverting me just because its me" which you do. (notice how you just had to fix me, but not KJ?) Yeah, see, thats you coming after me. Deny it all you want but really idc because you suck at passive aggressiveness and i think passive aggressiveness is stupid and superficial anyway. You didn't revert me because I was wrong, you reverted me because I'm me. And you will do anything and everything you can to impede me and make me look like a troll. I've grown accustomed to this however and it no longer phases me. Moving on.

"Because I'm right" and I am right. This build is a massive part of guildwars today and is the build of choice for pretty much any elite area you could possibly dream of stepping into. As such it will follow its brethren (the 55 the MM and the Imbagon) all of which are staples of PvE if you really had that hard of a time figuring that out on your own and it will get its own page to document the history of such an influential and powerful build that played such a major role in the history of GW.

The last bit was just me trailing off into insane gibberish because, as you keep throwing up non-consequential arguments and trying to use them as a cover up for simply dying to revert me and call me out, I felt the need to call you out on it. Get it now? Hope so. Because I'm done with this argument. --Master Briar 03:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

For one, finding the cleanup tag isn't exactly difficult. If it's not important, why bring it up? Why not just... remove the delete tag, as I've said multiple times you should do?

That's... not a revert. Sorry. That's my OCD blaring at me. KJ's indent fail doesn't trigger it because I see people indent at the same amount as the previous commenter when responding to two posts previous all the time. Sorry about that. (Yes, the original post sets my OCD off too, but I can't be fucked fixing the colons until the indent reset, so I just live with it.) And yes, I would have done that for anyone I noticed. I just happen to notice it more when you do it because you do it a lot more than other people. The world isn't out to get you, I promise. There's absolutely nothing I need to do to make you look like a troll - I just have to link your posts to Auron or someone if I really care about that kind of thing.

If you're so convinced that the wiki needs a page on it, for god's sake remove the delete tag and mention something in the edit summary about how you're going to clean it up. Jesus christ, stop being paranoid - it's making you look dumb.

-- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 03:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

I tried removing the delete tag. You reverted me. Remember sweetheart? --Master Briar 03:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Stop trolling. I know you have a brain - use it.

I removed the delete tag with the reason of "the talk page doesn't relate to actually deleting the page at all". You then said "Ok, I'll fix the page at some point in the future." I then said (repeatedly) "Oh, ok then! Go ahead and remove the tag and mention something about that in the edit summary."

I really don't see why you haven't removed the tag yet, unless you really can't comprehend what I've written (or you've just not read it, but that doesn't seem likely given the depth of your arguments).

-- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 04:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: boomerang arrows

It also doesn't make sense. That doesn't make paragons make any more sense, now does it? is for Raine, etc. 06:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Nope. But then again, it was a serious question. --Master Briar 06:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Drama?

Pling's pruning page isn't drama. There's no heated emotions, no controversy, and really no disagreement, unless you count the pitiful cries of the trolls as they are squashed underfoot. elix Omni 21:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

/shrug. You say thats not drama. I say it is. And trust me, Trolls will come back and create yet more drama. --Master Briar 21:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

And they'll get banned and ignored. Maybe laughed at. elix Omni 21:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

You really don't understand what makes a troll tick do you? =/ --Master Briar 21:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Au contraire, mon ami. elix Omni 21:31, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

I despise french. And if you do then why are we having this conversation? They're going to log in, Stir up some shit, Get blocked, Switch socks, Stir up more shit, So on so forth. Imo this will make this site more like 4chan because now everyone is going to be posting as anonymous to save themselves the trouble of logging in before they get blocked. So again, /shrug. You say its not drama, i say it is. --Master Briar 21:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Just drop it, you guys will never get in agreement. Reaper of Scythes** 21:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Nope, he does not. I also like how he tries to prove that Pling's article has no drama by causing drama on your talk page. :3 That article is full of ego nerds, hypocticy and butthurt people. That article is in itself a troll. --Myotheraccount 21:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

US VS THEM US VS THEM MAFARAXAS 22:31, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

lolpve

I liked that screenie. SoS build is new ursan now IMO. :3 --Myotheraccount 21:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Lol. Did you notice that it was a War running it? xD I love PvE. :D --Master Briar 21:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah lol. I run that on my sin sometiems. Reminds me of when I just started GW and was an A/Rt casting spirits and now it's liek teh smex. :3 --Myotheraccount 22:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Ikr? So funneh. xD --Master Briar 22:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Are you two people?

Your Recent edit makes me think so , either that or you have two totaly different Personalitys O_o --Neil2250 , Render Lord 10:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I have split personalities, schizophrenia, and more personalities than every Asian culture in the history of the world combined.

On a more serious note, I usually figure it out on my own when I'm wrong. And have no problem admitting it after I do. And have a habit of making fun of myself for it. Half because I'm a dick and half because I'm an emotional masochist. --Master Briar 10:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

It's not funny reading retarded comments by yourself months later ;o ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 10:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. No one asked the poro gallery. --Master Briar 10:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Isent a Poro a type of Deer?, Anyway yeh.ive commented on stuff 3 years old before :D --Neil2250 , Render Lord 11:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

/PvX for E-define of Poro.

So have I. Lol. Sometimes i just can't help myself. --Master Briar 11:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I got ec'd D: nvm --Myotheraccount 11:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Been a while since people have come to my talk page. O.O --Master Briar 11:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, Feel its important to mention, It isn't a joke about dual personalities. Briar/Mike. Plus theres 2 other people living in my house (little brother/father) plus Im on an apt complex internet router. So, on occasion, Yes. I am hundreds of different people. --Master Briar 11:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I day be so long. O.O Oh and it's not funny reading retarded comments by yourself months later cause they look less retarded than what you currently write. They are actually the same though, it's just a thing of perception. >: That what I wanted to write before I got mercilessly EC'd. Boo. Every time I write something long I get EC'd. Q_________Q --Myotheraccount 11:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I know that :> ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 11:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Nou. --Master Briar 11:09, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Nou. --Myotheraccount 11:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Everyone has a private, regular real life, e-me, and those. For some the differences are just bigger, like in my case ;o ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 11:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Does that mean that irl all trolls are serious and civil irl and all the civil GWW'ers are the opposite ? :> --Myotheraccount 11:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Irl I have a billion dollars, a throne made of solid diamond, and a 17 inch cock. :> --Master Briar 11:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

lol Chaos would love the cock part if he really was gay. >: --Myotheraccount 11:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I fuck women and fish too. ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 12:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm pretty polite and serious, or whatever I feel like being. At least in private I consider myself v much more likable ;o ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 12:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Those with Wiki-fu please halp

I wanna create an icon () that means multiple professions, but not all professions. But i need ideas.--Master Briar 23:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

[3] is an example. Just mix the icons somehow. ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 07:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

2/10 Terrible troll

You're not allowed to grade fail trolling when you yourself, fail. --adrin 05:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Kiss my ass? --Master Briar 06:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

nty. the stentch of failure is strong enough on your page im afraid to get anywhere near your ass. --adrin 07:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

kk gfy. You're not clever. you're not funny. And you're way too obvious when you troll. It makes me sadface. --Master Briar 07:34, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

you just make such an easy target. failing less solves that. try it out sometime ^^ --adrin 07:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Sounds like fun. You can go now. Thanks. --Master Briar 07:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. Good luck on trying not to fail. I can redirect you here if you need any help. Have a nice day! --adrin 07:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah. Sure. Link is Vhelpful and you're Vclever. Go away now. --Master Briar 07:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)