User:NuclearVII/Archive 3

First

^ — Teh Uber Pwnzer 18:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Ohai thar. Second. -- NUKLEAR IIV 19:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

3rd Lilondra *poke* 09:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

GW2 suggestions

I linked your page. You may want to provide a summary. Backsword 11:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Whaaa...? -- NUKLEAR IIV 11:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

noez

super igor is back nuke him Lilondra *poke* 14:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I has moar nooks --Super Igor 16:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Go away igor. I don't want you messing with my shit. Do not try my patience this time around. I waas sick of you the last time - and you're not even good at your trolling. Go away. -- NUKLEAR IIV 16:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

At last you have called yourself a real name - shit! Nuk got real O.O you should say thanks to me for bringing you back to realityROFLMAO! --Super Igor 17:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Go. Away. If you post in this page again without good reason, I will go to the noticeboard. -- NUKLEAR IIV 18:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

i asked

to continue this discussion (or troll) somewhere else >< anyway gl Lilondra *poke* 16:41, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Please don't egg him on. It's pointless - he wins when you fight him. How hard is that to understand? -- NUKLEAR IIV 16:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

for someone whos tired already quite hard sry Lilondra *poke* 16:57, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

apparently

youre allowed to make an archive for idiots only and move all spam on youre talk page to it can be handy Lilondra *poke* 18:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

good to know.

that you have stars in your house that are protected.75.172.44.33 20:04, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Split from the community page

Finally, you know as well as I do that RFA's are not polls. In fact, I am geniuinely suprised to hear this from an old pro - Numbers do not count in an RFA, the weight of the arguments of the voters do. I don't think it would be far to say that RFA's are merely PR tools for bureucrats, but that's neither here nor there. Also, what brains said."

Exactly the other way round, check what brains actually said: "Polls = numbered/bulleted arguments and input which provide an (rough) idea on what the community thinks. Votes = purely numbers; the highest is the decision. RfAs and PvX ratings are polls". --Xeeron 21:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm not a native speaker of english. To me, (or it used to be) Polls = Votes. Sorry for the mixup, but that's really semantics from now on. -- NUKLEAR IIV 13:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Huh o_o Where are you from? Your English is perfect, as far as I can see. Erasculio 13:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm turkish. I know on the internet it does't really show, but I have one hell of an accent. In turkish, polls and votes are pretty much the same thing - the language doesn't have the large vocabulary english does - so I use them interchagably. Meh, Happens, I guess. -- NUKLEAR IIV 13:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

That's because English is a retarded language.

A poll, for future reference, is a collection of opinions (generally in the form of votes) used to gain a general idea of an answer to a question. For example, one might take a poll to get an idea of what skin users want the site to have; the poll has no real weight, however, and the results of a poll do not immediately mean action will be taken towards the result it suggests.

A vote is either a cast of the opinion ("my vote is for the blue skin") or a gathering to cast opinions to decide something (similar to the English word "election"). In the latter sense, a single vote has inherent weight, in that the results of the election will be used to determine a course of action.

-- Armond Warblade 13:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

English is actually pretty awesome - It 's relativly easy to understand and gibberish english is actually comprehensable (Me tell very very best england).

French is retarded. SOrry if there are any french among here, but damn I hate the language. There are no rules in the french language! Oh sure, you have some, but the exceptions are so goddamn omnipresent that they revoke the rules. Blehhhh.... -- NUKLEAR IIV 14:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I hate English (not a native speaker myself). It sounds like a dog barking. At least it's easy to learn (now try to learn Portuguese...That's a challenge). Erasculio 14:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

NPA

Abide by it. Your comments on the community portal talk are unacceptable. Leave the speaker out of the argument entirely and focus on the argument itself - if the points are wrong, counter them, but don't bring the poster or his history (or lack thereof) into the debate, because it frankly doesn't matter. "Whoru? What have you done to make the balance pages better? What gives you the right to make baseless accusations on well-estabished users that work for the good of this wiki?" That kind of stuff doesn't belong. If you want to know who he is, ask him on his IP talk page, and do it in a manner that makes it obvious your question isn't related to the discussion on the CP talk (i.e., don't make it seem like you'll ignore his comments if he doesn't give you a detailed history).
Your feedback on that issue is appreciated, but remember to keep it civil. -Auron 02:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

On hindsight, you are probably right. I should not have vented the way I did back then. Still... Fine. -- NUKLEAR IIV 13:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Meh. I planned to respond earlier today, but a combination of a guild invite/runs and that page being ridiculously long prevented me from getting anything written up.

I don't really like most of the suggestions people made. I don't like picking 4 people as suggestion-filterers, let alone the 4 most mentioned. I, personally, don't understand balance enough to filter out comments and suggestions that Izzy may never read. I have my general idea of how guild wars should be balanced, or rather, how it should be fixed retroactively to make it not suck... but I can't say my opinion is better than anyone else's. I can see what is broken in the meta better than most people who post, since I am more active in high-end PvP than most of them, but being able to see what skills are breaking the game doesn't help me decide which comments/suggestions are useful and should be passed on to Izzy.

I'm not sure about Shard, but I don't think he fully grasps balance either. Most of the changes he puts forth are number tweaks, which are all well and good, but don't do things like fix broken mechanics. I've never had a lot to do with you, but from what I've seen, I don't think you're really up for the task either. Armond, the last somewhat-popular choice, doesn't even play Guild Wars anymore (and hasn't for awhile).

I think the best option would be a community-driven thing. Because of the time constraints, a vote of some sort would be in order. Maybe like 3 days for people to add their suggestion to "the list," then X days of voting on "the list," and the top 10 go to izzy. The process would start over Y days later. It might not get the best options through, but it would be most fair to the community. Izzy's got his private forum for high-end PvPers to comment on balance. Seeing as izzy doesn't post on QQ, guru, gwo or anywhere else, the wiki could be a place for the average player to get his question in to him.

Sorry for wall of texting in the wrong section - you can copypaste whatever you want to whereever it applies. I'm not sure I'll have time this week to get to that discussion (busy day today, surgery on thursday... I'll be out of touch for awhile). -Auron 14:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I think you overestimate the skill required for the job. Mostly, we'd be required to filter out the awful suggestions (like making evisc on par with WS) and get a few good things through to Izzy. By the way, I've recently been forced into doing GvG with friends for lulz, so you can't quite say I don't play anymore. :P -- Armond Warblade 14:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I think you four would do a good job. IMO, it's less a matter of telling Isaiah what to do (everyone will be making suggestions anyway, that's not what the "committee" would have to do) and more a matter of being able to notice the more pressing issues and get the more reasonable suggestions among all the input in those pages. I think there are a lot of people on the wiki reasonable enough to see what's a reasonable suggestion and what isn't; the four individuals I suggested have the advantage of being reasonable and also caring about balance enough. Erasculio 14:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

"I can see what is broken in the meta better than most people who post, since I am more active in high-end PvP". See, that's enough. At least, In my book, it is. I would have ensign do balance, but he doesn't care about this wiki of late (Been a year since His last contribution, I'd say) so the next best alternative is a group of lesser people work together.

I have already expressed why I never liked voting. It's not that I believe that people are idiots, nor do I believe they are always biased. Misguided, perhaps, but not even that. To be honest, I don't clearly know why, but I never liked Polls or votes or whatever you may call them. Maybe it's because My enviorment is filled with ignorant idiots. Maybe. But the real reason I wouldn't like voting in this scenario is that, well, voting is slow. We have a lot of crap to shift through - and voting our way is not going to work, at least, in time.

Shard doesn't grasp balance. He's too heavy-handed. I don't grasp balance. I'm too light-handed, too experimental, too outlandish. Armond doesn't play. All of these facts I cannot deny, but I do believe that as a team, we'd work fine together.

I know we didn't have much to do in the future, but I hope that may change (perhaps in gw2, lol). In the meantime, have a pleasant surgery. -- NUKLEAR IIV 14:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

somewhat related

1 ~ Kurd 15:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

lol. That made my day. -- NUKLEAR IIV 15:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Grasp King

I read your userpage. I cant be burnt alive, because many arson attempts on me have transformed me into a FLAMING GRASP KING! NOW I AM MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU! BOW TO ME!--Burning Freebies 16:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

me, having a bad day. Still wish to anger me, Little One? -- NUKLEAR IIV 16:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Anger you? Im not angering you, im just telling you to BOW TO ME before i set 5000 grasps on you. --Burning Freebies 20:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Im here to inform you that this King will bother you no more, for his life was lost. --Burning Freebies 19:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Chess Game

Hey,. your up, sorry, looks like my move didn't go through yesterday for some reason..... — Wolf 21:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

We need to set a date and time ot juts play. We are the only two left who haven't finished our first-round game. — Wolf 16:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

That might have something to do with me being blocked. Lol. 85.108.218.75 07:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Fine, I withdraw. This is nuclearVII, dodging my unjustified ban. 85.108.218.75 08:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Adding a new section

Tsk tsk. Not using the "+" to add a new section to the admin noticeboard. Had me confused for a second or two. :P --JonTheMon 15:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm really sorry. -- NUKLEAR IIV 15:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

It's no prob. Keeps me on my toes. --JonTheMon 15:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

ATTENTION WEAKLINGS

Your emminence Nuclear the Seventh will be offline for a while, entertaining is glorious person with Mass effect. That is all. -- NUKLEAR IIV 14:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

yay --Cursed Angel 01:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

I barely know who you are.- Vanguard 01:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Then you're doing it wrong. -- Armond Warblade 12:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

no u.- Vanguard 22:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Create A Profession is coming to an end

This message is to inform you that this is your last day to work on your profession. Judges will only judge what you have on the 28th. If anything is added after the 28th, it will not be taken into consideration during judging. The judges will be judging all of the entrys on Sept. 28th - 30th. Make sure you make any touch ups, etc. that need to be added today. The winner(s) and points awarded will be announced shortly after the 30th. We thank you for particpating in The Create A Profession Contest! This is an automated message --Shadowphoenix 22:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Update

Create A Profession is having some delays in judging, therefore the judging period has been bumped up and will end on Oct. 5th. We apologize for the inconvenience. Winners and points awarded will be announced shortly after Oct. 5th. Please do not edit your profession pages. Thank you! This is an automated message --Shadowphoenix 02:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Why is the wiki

Extra slow of late? And why am I still banned? 85.108.218.75 08:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Arena Net installed a large upgrade a couple days ago, and that upgrade had some issues, so we have had plenty of downtimes these last days. Theorically it's fixed now. I think you were banned because of this, and you're going to be banned for a week. Although I think you were right in asking Brains (despite how he's likely going to ban your IP now : P). Erasculio 11:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Apparently it's a personal attack to call someone "a qualified ****", even when there's really not much that could be filled in to the blank that the "target" likely won't ever see, just as it's a personal attack to warn someone against what type of person they'll be if they continue to ignore reason... 75.182.89.73 12:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

06:47, September 29, 2008 Brains12 (Talk | contribs | block) blocked NuclearVII (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 week (account creation disabled) ‎ (personal attacks) (unblock) from the block log -- Wyn 12:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Aw

come back nuke? Seriously, the Arena Net space is going to be a major mess now. Arena Net is working on an official announcement about the feedback pages (Emily mentioned she made quite a few big meetings about this, and that she and Regina are working on the official statement), so depending on how it goes you may consider coming back; if they state they are more than PR, maybe Isaiah would obey their insight (and if they tell us the section is useless and that we could remove it, you may as well come back temporarily to be part of the lulz : P).

If you don't come back, good luck with your life. Thanks for all the work you did for the wiki (yep, it made a difference; for example, now we know that we can delete most of the feedback stuff without a backlash) and for all the insights you shared with us.

(Oh, and I saw quite a few Freudian slips on your goodbye - "I longer have a reason to be here" hopefully means you'll come back some day : D) Erasculio 22:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

That's not a Freudian slip. Also, goodbye Nuke, I'll miss your disdain for the people running this show and similar taste in satirical encyclopædias. --Jette 21:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

spore...? owell, if u say so. tbh cancer is funnier than spore. --Cancer Angel 23:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

And another reasonable person leaves the wiki (and it sounds kinda like leaving the game is following...). While I'm not surprised, good luck on whatever you do. --Kalas Silvern 01:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Honorable Mention

You got a Honorable Mention in Create A Profession! You have gotten 45 points to spend on prizes! Please name which prizes you want on the Prize talk page. To see the other winners, have a look at the Create A Profession page! --Shadowphoenix 18:38, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Fixed

You put down my instead of me so just fixed it for you in "I thank you Brains, for banning my without a decent reason" to "I thank you Brains, for banning me without a decent reason."William Wallace 11:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Q_Q. Spelling checker William wins at the game! Dark Morphon(contribs) 16:22, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Adding a deletion tag?

Anyone with the rights to do it? I mean, he said himself no one'll miss him and he probably will not return. Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 11:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

You don't delete a user page just because the user leaves... What happened to basic wiki etiquette? :/ -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 23:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

If it was super Igor ok but nuclearVII ? When did common sense abandon whats left of humanity ? Lilondra *poke* 15:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Let's put a delete tag on Igor's anyway. I just looked at his page, it makes me RAEG with the fury of a thousand suns. --Jette 17:24, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

let's put a delete on igors page for lols. :p --Venomoth 02:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

and then put it at encyclopedia dramatica under the section we did it for the lulz Lilondra *poke* 08:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

4th

and btw, congrats xD

NuclearVII scored silver on one of Halogod's Contests.

-- Halogod35 01:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

stalker

i herd u still stalk wiki, is this true? --Cancer Angel 17:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

welcome back

Or should I say stop adding uncouth and unnecessary comments? Your comment to me on Shard's talk page has absolutely nothing to do with the subject and is just unnecessary. Oh, but if it's true, congrats. -- Wyn 17:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

No, you're ass.

Seriously, you are. Go ahead, remove my insulting comments, it'll make you look like the mature person that you really are, and an administrator that we all look upon. -- NUKLEAR IIV 17:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Aren't you wasting your time being here, Nuke, or has something changed? If you're returning to contribute constructively, welcome back. If not, well.. -- Brains12 \ talk 17:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Contributing? What can I contribute to? As far as I can see, the wiki is still the same shit heap the way I left it - only with more needless drama.

I enjoy tipping hands of trigger happy admins, tbh. -- NUKLEAR IIV 17:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

) Lilondra *gale* 18:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh good, Nuke's back. --Kalas Silvern 06:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

The internet is for .... :P -=-Koda Kumi 19:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

P.. COOKIES Lilondra *gale* 11:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

spore sucks ass

spore sucks ass five games strapped onto it, yeah. Five terrible versions of five good games. spore sucks ass lrn2findgudgamesnadlrn2tonowhenagameisgutcussporeclearlyisnot

Only Oni would fail so miserably with indents. Hai oni! Dark Morphon(contribs) 14:15, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

No idea who posted it, bt he certainly is right. Just think about it. Pac-man had some kind of challenge, Diablo had some, Warlords definitely was challenging, and Civilisation was a great challenge. Spore just picked them up and threw them into a heap of short, boring versions. The editor was great, it showed some great promise, but regrettably the lack of any challenge did not keep me playing. -=-Koda Kumi 22:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

No, pretty sure spore is challanging. Try to wipe out all grox on hardest. Also, fuck you. -- NUKLEAR IIV 20:49, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, and guildwars pve is a really hard game if you play solo without any equip/skills, whats yer point? grox is boring anyway, It's just the same repeated stuff but..with alot more stuff.Oni 16:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Peace out nuke

It was wonderful having you here. It's just a shame a bad game company ruined a good game. I will undoubtedly post a similar wall that people who hate me will not read. Anyways thanks for being one of the more intelligent people here, even though it's against some retarded wiki policy to be intelligent. Peace. ~Shard 08:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

I, too, am pretty much leaving the wiki. I'll still make edits from time in the main namespace when I find some obscure detail nobody realized before or need to make yet another abbreviation redirect, but I'm tired of slamming my brain against the brick reinforced concrete DRAGONFORCE wall that is ANet's incompetence and "fuck da players" policies. And probably keep troll postan on the suggestion page, if somebody ever reverts it. Nice meeting the two of you. --Jette 08:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)