User talk:Jon Lupen/Archive6
no first yet? wow. ··· Danny Pew Pew 18:51, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fewer people stalk my page, and the few that do, don't first. — Jon Lupen 19:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- i just leave "Watch this page" checked and refresh my watchlist whenever work gets to be particularly boring. ··· Danny Pew Pew 19:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- I imagine not many poeple watch my page, as it is rather uneventful. Its most frequent use is for sysops to tap me on the shoulder and say, "Hey, you screwed up here," or "Don't forget this." It's generally a quiet little town. — Jon Lupen 19:32, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- I watch your page. - Mini Me 19:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Emphasis on "not many." — Jon Lupen 19:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Do I make a tie breaker? Titani Ertan 19:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- What tie? — Jon Lupen 19:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Make connections to recent sentances. Titani Ertan 19:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm still lost. — Jon Lupen 19:51, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Make connections to recent sentances. Titani Ertan 19:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- What tie? — Jon Lupen 19:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Do I make a tie breaker? Titani Ertan 19:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Emphasis on "not many." — Jon Lupen 19:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- I watch your page. - Mini Me 19:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- I imagine not many poeple watch my page, as it is rather uneventful. Its most frequent use is for sysops to tap me on the shoulder and say, "Hey, you screwed up here," or "Don't forget this." It's generally a quiet little town. — Jon Lupen 19:32, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- i just leave "Watch this page" checked and refresh my watchlist whenever work gets to be particularly boring. ··· Danny Pew Pew 19:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Archive
I didn't think you were suppose to Archive Other People's Pages, especially Staff Pages. Rather Irresponsible, in my opinion. ♥ Ariyen ♀ 22:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- With pages like Regina's and Linsey's, they tag topics that are ready to be archived with where they are to be archived to so the community can handle it, and so they don't have to spend as much time managing their page, because we all know they don't have much time as it is. If you see another user archive something on Regina's or Linsey's page, check the history. If it was a tagged topic, then all is fine. But yes, as a general rule of thumb (or rule of policy to be specific), don't archive other people's talk pages unless express permission has been given, which it has in this case. — Jon Lupen 22:25, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- My understanding was the tagging was for sysops to move, not any typical user, like us. Hence, the only other people I've seen (besides themselves) moving anything was a sysop, not a 'typical' user. ♥ Ariyen ♀ 23:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
typo
in your notes. Hencman instead of henchman. - Mini Me talk 14:48, 30 October 2009
- I noticed. I was planning on fixing those once I finished the Guild Hall henchmen. — Jon Lupen 14:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Weapons
I believe you wield it :) --Arduin 15:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Henchmen
I'm rewording them all so they use the same words, for standardization. We should pick one way of saying it and stick to it. That's all. Ailina 02:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think that Jon's way is shorter, more concise, and easier to understand. --★KOKUOU★ 02:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Edit conflict! I was going to say, I just noticed you already reworded the ones I edited. Your way is much better. I was just copying all of them to be the same as the first one I saw, which was already done. I will do the rest of them your way as I continue my search. Thanks! Ailina 02:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- On that note, do you happen to know of the models for Vincent Evan and Dahlia? I can't find them, but I've heard several people say that they "recognized all of the models", or similar phrases. Any thoughts? Ailina 02:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Edit conflict! I was going to say, I just noticed you already reworded the ones I edited. Your way is much better. I was just copying all of them to be the same as the first one I saw, which was already done. I will do the rest of them your way as I continue my search. Thanks! Ailina 02:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Diablo
Me, Shard & Elu are going to do a full Diablo 1 run tomorrow night...we need a 4th, want to come with us? I haven't played D1 yet, so it should be fun.--*Yasmin Parvaneh* 16:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- If I make it to a computer that I can play Diablo off of tomorrow, it'll be a maricle... I'll try, but no guarantees. — Jon Lupen 16:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- d1 battle.net only holds 4? And are all you guys starting with new characters? --RIDDLE16:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- d2 is better, yo.-- anguard 16:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) I would be. I got in in the D2 battle chest and it has never left the sleeve it came in. X) — Jon Lupen 16:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- @Vanguard: Indeed it is. And yes, I'm fully aware of all the implications that come with agreeing with that claim. — Jon Lupen 16:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- I got a level 20-something warrior, but I can't remember how D1 treats single player characters on battle.net (There isn't a "closed" battle.net for D1, IIRC). --RIDDLE 16:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- We play D2 all the time, so we wanted to be radical and roll D1. Yes, we are starting new characters. My copy of Baldur's Gate is coming in a few days, so we'll be posting for players for that too.--*Yasmin Parvaneh* 16:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- I got a level 20-something warrior, but I can't remember how D1 treats single player characters on battle.net (There isn't a "closed" battle.net for D1, IIRC). --RIDDLE 16:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- @Vanguard: Indeed it is. And yes, I'm fully aware of all the implications that come with agreeing with that claim. — Jon Lupen 16:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- d1 battle.net only holds 4? And are all you guys starting with new characters? --RIDDLE16:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
ign
can i talk tehre? i dont want floodin the wiki :( 128.176.178.20 20:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm on a computer that doesn't have Guild Wars on it atm. :P Besides, flooding the wiki to resolve an issue is usually OK. — Jon Lupen 20:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- So I can wtf chain? Titani Ertan 21:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- A mass influx of WTF chaining is not resolving an issue. :P — Jon Lupen 21:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- WTF shortage is srs bsns. Titani Ertan 21:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- ... — Jon Lupen 21:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- okay ill list things
- library computer
- some students got wiki of guild wars blocked because you should lern and not do hobby stuff
- i only use that one library cmputer of those 30 or so
- i have a bit more user rights and CAN use the wiki there
- i edit from a friends computer with my user name because i like to be linked to my student ip
- my own compter went boom =/
- thanks you 128.176.178.20 21:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- also: wtf? :D 128.176.178.20 21:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- The problem with signing as an IP of a public computer comes from the fact that it's a public computer. Should any other person use it and contribute to the wiki under that IP, your current user name comes under the grounds of impersonation, see where I'm going with this? — Jon Lupen 21:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- man this crap wiki is horribler than anythin i kmow i think i can just go and forget praised crane O:< 128.176.178.20 21:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- 1)horribler isn't a word 2)wtf? 3)wtf? 4)why give up so soon? You want to do something? Stand up for yourself. Titani Ertan 21:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- jon are you blind or stupid? ha forget it you are both thanks for nothing im out 128.176.178.20 21:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- 1)horribler isn't a word 2)wtf? 3)wtf? 4)why give up so soon? You want to do something? Stand up for yourself. Titani Ertan 21:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- man this crap wiki is horribler than anythin i kmow i think i can just go and forget praised crane O:< 128.176.178.20 21:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- The problem with signing as an IP of a public computer comes from the fact that it's a public computer. Should any other person use it and contribute to the wiki under that IP, your current user name comes under the grounds of impersonation, see where I'm going with this? — Jon Lupen 21:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- also: wtf? :D 128.176.178.20 21:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- okay ill list things
- ... — Jon Lupen 21:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- WTF shortage is srs bsns. Titani Ertan 21:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- A mass influx of WTF chaining is not resolving an issue. :P — Jon Lupen 21:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- So I can wtf chain? Titani Ertan 21:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
User:JonLupen
If you gain control of that account, and wish it to be unblocked, please just ask. It seemed you were adverse to having it actively participating in that discussion. -- Wyn talk 22:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Noted. Participating in that discussion, a little; being in the hands of another user, a lot more so. Also, thanks for taking care of that end. I wasn't so sure they were going to turn the account over. :P — Jon Lupen 01:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
1
Your comments in that section are unnecessary. Don't post to hear yourself speak. You have zero idea what ANet's doing and you have no more information than anyone else on the topic, so just stop spamming reggie's talk page with useless comments and leave it alone for Anet devs to comment on. Your janitorial/archival duties don't include posting incessantly for no reason. Thanks in advance. -Auron 03:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- And why don't you talk to the other twenty thousand people who post even more worthless stuff on her page and actually disrupt the wiki? If I was posting to hear myself talk, I would have filled EVERY SINGLE TOPIC five thousand times over with comments by now, because believe me, I have every chance to do it. Last I checked, two posts does not count as spamming. Your sysop duties do not include harassing other users for normal, non-disruptive actions. Pull your head out of your ass, stfu, and bugger off. Oh, and block me for NPA while your at it if my TWO POSTS on Regina's page qualify as spamming. — Jon Lupen 03:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- That link in the title doesn't really show anything banworthy... i see 2 posts of non-offensive junk. if you're going to ban people for posting useless junk, noone would be online. --adrin 05:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
^ -- Lacky 22:48, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
From the new archive...
first and tie. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 00:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Congrats!
Yoooooooou have beeeeeeeeeeen nominated! Seriously, we do need more people, as recent events have shown. Erasculio 11:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Noted. This one is going to take much pondering. — Jon Lupen 18:42, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- You'd be a good candidate imo. — Mini Me 20:15, 23 January 2010
Sorry I vanished...
Windows 7 decided to delete itself midway into our conversation last night. Thank god I had like 4 Star Trek episodes in my DVR and a new Project Runway.--*Yasmin Parvaneh* 17:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Mind if I...
Move the portions of that convo where myself an jette actually suggested solutions to bot problem back to Regina's page?--TahiriVeila 18:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
God damn
You're good at making wall of texts. →[ »Halogod (talk)« ]← 06:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)