User talk:Lussh/archive1

Hello, Liche, and welcome to the Official Guild Wars Wiki! If you need help with anything, don't hesitate to add a message to my talk page. I highly recommend that you check out the "Welcome to the wiki" page - it's extremely useful as an initial guide. Best of luck and happy editing!--§ Eloc § 09:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Images

Images you have uploaded are in violation of the wiki's policies due to image naming, and is therefore up for deletion. Any image that is going to be used only for guild or user pages need to follow a specific naming pattern, to ease maintenance. Please see the image policy. Fall 12:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Signing Comments

Hey, remember to sign your comments with --~~~~ on talk page so people can easily see who you are.--§ Eloc § 04:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

ok thanks --lussh 19:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Np.--§ Eloc § 23:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Hiya, note that accordig to GWW:USER you need to register User:Lussh if you want to use it as the name that your sig shows. -- (gem / talk) 10:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Well i had a hard time to register as lussh or liche, both were having troubles ( sorry there is no user registered as liche / sorry there is no user registered as lussh )

i made what i could, i'm not a good informtician. at least i can connect and add informations to pages under a same name, that's the most important to me, it's working i did'nt wanted to try to make the both names becoming the same, i'd like to be abble to come and works on pages i'd like to and say what i want to too.

What I'm saying is that you can use the name Lussh in your sig, but you must first register that user name to yourself. :) -- (gem / talk) 10:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

ok i'll try, i'm sorry i'm a little dumb with computers and registrations procedures ^^^

tern, i still forget to sign my comments , rip me. lussh 10:50, 11 November 2007 (UTC))

I think i manage to do it properly, some gods must haved blessed me Lussh 10:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC))

:) Nice. -- (gem / talk) 10:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

^^(lussh/liche is happy)lussh 10:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

I set up the redirects for User:Lussh and User talk:Lussh so if someone searches for that username, they will be sent here. -- br12 • (talk) • 16:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

He/She can't use Lussh as it violates GWW:SIGN. "Signatures may show a shortened version of your user name.". Last time I checked, Lussh isn't a shortened version of Liche. — ク Eloc 貢 17:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

AS long as "may show" doesn't mean must, i don't see where is the problem. The difference between my signature and my real acount name come from problems during my registration. Don't you have better things to do than come telling me that i'm violating this particular rule ?

If you think i'm a bully because i use lussh instead of liche, wich is i must admit, a DRAMATICAL behavior that must not be allowed at any cost, then don't worry ; at the next warning, i won't bother anyone anymore. I don't like to fight, but i despite far more stupidity. Bothering me with things as useless as this makes me angry.

because you "asked" me to change my sign in that way, i won't do it. I won't say what i think of the way you did it, because that would give you opportunity to say that i violate another rule.

just don't bother me again with such meaningless details. lussh 09:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I think what he means by, "Signatures may show a shortened version of your user name" is that you must use your registered user name, but you may use a shortened version. In other words, you can use one or the other. If you want to use that name so badly, just move your userpage to User:Lussh. Problem solved. Kokuou 09:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. The main rule is "Clearly display your username in your signature.". The "Signatures may show a shortened version of your user name." is an exception to that rule. -- (gem / talk) 09:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Alright, that should work now :) — ク Eloc 貢 16:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Lussh, noone intends to "bother" you with anything, and we aren't trying to make you into a bully. It's just that a policy was written and agreed on, and we have to follow it. If someone doesn't like it, they can take steps to change it through discussion. Please don't take this personally, Lussh, it is just something we have to do. -- br12 • (talk) • 21:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

follow to follow is meaningless, you have to do it doesn't mean you don't have to think. "It's not me, it's the rule" is just excuses because you can't think by yourself, so, in the end, we find things like that. i own two names, and i get warned because "it violate the rule" go think by yourself and don't bother me with meaningless details such as my names are. even if you think your beautyfull rules are all mighty, your own judgement should be and stay above thoses. lussh 23:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

( and your usefull comment is bothering me too by the way. ) lussh 23:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I can think perfectly fine for myself, thank you. I'll stay off your talk page if I'm bothering you so much, but I don't expect insults towards me saying I'm mindless who can't think for myself. I just choose to follow rules-- br12 • (talk) • 23:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

i hardly believe someone who does can come bother me for my name. this choice seems illogical to me. it's over i'm tired now, as usual, discussions are getting nowhere. I won't watch or come to this page anymore i believe ; it's useless. lussh 23:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

One Revert Rule

Hi... Your last adition to the Image:Necromancer Deathlace Leggings f.jpg appears to be in violation of the One-revert rule policy. In order to avoid revert wars when concensus is not reached, players can only revert a particular edit on a section of a page only once. As such, i would advice you to go to the page in question and put it back to it's last state, as specified in the same rule (since i can't now because i would be breaking 1rr also).
Regarding the image, i still think it's proper place to be displayed is on the Necromancer Deathlace Leggings article, but if you really want to upload the image (and are not sure where or how to put it, you could ask in the help section.--Fighterdoken 17:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

I have reverted it, my revert won't violate 1RR since I am a different user. -- br12 • (talk) • 17:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

The reversion policy does not apply to removing policy violations, it specifically states libel as one of the exceptions. Please, be reasonable. - anja 11:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do help me understand

On User talk:Armond#User page content, you said You did not understood a single tiny part of my point. I assume you're directing that at me, if not, feel free to ignore me.

It is my understanding that you're basically stating that Armond's statement was not made with the intention of attacking Erasculio. And that he has a right to express his dislike and his reasons for the dislike. Did I get it wrong? Did you get me wrong?

Regardless, with a to-the-point observation by Defiant Elements, I hope to try and get people to start talking (hopefully calmly) about their differences in their ideas of how and when NPA should be used. If I'm still too thick to get what you're trying to say, well, sorry about that, but I hope you would try to explain it again over there. Thanks. -- ab.er.rant 13:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

I feel that you personally attacked me, Ab.er.rant. The word "thick" seems directed at me, and I consider that a personal attack.

Well, not really. :P But that's how it seems people are about NPA. I like the suggestion posted (though I'm a bit behind on reading the discussion). Armond 21:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Screenshots

Hi, I really appreciate all the monster screenshots you have been uploading recently but could you please put {{screenshot}} in the description as this tags them as a screenshot and means people like myself do not have to manually tag them. Thank very much. Lyra Valo 20:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Signature

You can't be using Lushh as your signature while logged in as Liche. It breaks GWW:SIGN. If you wish to consider using Lushh as your signature, start logging in as Lushh. — ク Eloc 貢 22:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd like to expand on that with a reason. While the signature policy says you can use a sig that's a shortened version, or something that's obviously you, but Lussh is nothing like Liche. Because of that, it's not allowed. If you really want to use Lussh, just login as that. -- br12 • (talk) • 22:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Allez vous faire foutre. Vous n'avez rien de mieux a faire que de me chasser parceque j'utilise deux noms pour des raisons déja expliquées ? Allez faire respecter vos règles stupides dans le cul des poneys bande de débiles. Changez cette règle a la con ou passez vous de moi, dans les deux cas je vous méprise. Lussh 03:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Screw you, i don't find any polite way to make you understand your stupidity. You don't have anything better to do than hunt me because i use two names for reasons already explained ? Go make your rules be respected in poneys asss you retards. Change this stupid rule or get rid of me, in both case i despite you. lussh 03:39, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

I didn't came here to be constantly BORED by stupidity. I came to get informations and give many informations/screenshots. IF your stupid politics can't agree with my mains goals for fucking useless details as TWO NAMES ; Then do what you want ! Get rid of me ! I will continue like that because i won't obey rules i found rather stupid ! And i didn't came to try to make rules be more in my way, i won't artgue with you policy to change it so it can be cool with me ; i didn't came for that. I'll do what i want ( get and give infomrations ) ; and under the name i want. If you disagree with me, i don't care. If you think i'm useless or more dangerous than usefull to the wiki, destroy both accounts ; otherwise, stay out of my way and shut up before saying stupidity about jerk rules. My comportment is impolite here because stupidty is angrying me, otherwise, i'm showing respect.

I'll make my way, get and give, under the name i want. You agree ? fine. You disagree ? You have choice between allowing me to do so, if it need changing the rule, i won't fight for it, i have better things to do ; or ban me. Come on, i'm useless and dangerous for all the wiki, ban me little brats.

Ey kiddy, you can play a game call Guild Wars ( do you know it ? ) or help the gwiki to improve you know ? Owwww i'm sorry, i didn't saw you were busy inspecting users names and talks pages to play cop and judge ! Well, it's a fine more funny game isn't it ? I bet you give more time on talks pages than pages. Despecable.

And my conclusion : I'm sick tired to "discuss" with childs because i disobey childish rules. Discussions are useless, you'll never understand me, and i won't either. I won't "kill" you, because i can't and have better to do than fight stupids. You can by banning me. If you tthink this is the best thing to do for the wiki, don't ask, do it.

I won't ever come on my talk(s) page(s) ever again. Lussh 04:00, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Don't Disrupt Wikipedia Guild Wars Wiki to Illustrate a Point. If you don't agree with our policy, fine. Does that mean you can break the policy and do what you want? No. Feel free to discuss the policy on the GWW:SIGN talk page. Because if I don't believe murder should be illegal, and I go on a killing spree, is it perfectly acceptable? Of course not. We don't want User X signing as User Y for the obvious reason of people confusing the two in discussions. Calor (t) 04:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Lussh, please try to be more polite in your interactions with other users. Eloc, please don't go on policy witch hunts, they're not beneficial to the goals of the wiki nor are they in good faith. The spirit of a policy is far more important than the precise wording, and the goal here is not to have a strict environment where noone can step a foot out of line, but rather to document a game. By calling people out on even the most minor deviation from a policy which has little to do with that goal, you detract from the progress and success of the wiki as a whole by wasting time that would be better spent improving content. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 08:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Not trying to go on witch hunts or anything, but policys are set out, specific rules which need to be followed or pretty much the whole wiki can fall apart. It's not hard, all Lussh needs to do is just log in as Liche. — † Eloc † 08:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Your habit of creating confrontations over matters as small as this is far more likely to "make the wiki fall apart" than a user typing a couple of different characters in their textual signature ever is. Again, please, stop with the witch hunting because that's exactly what it is. Unless you have had a specific incident in which this user's behavior caused you problems, it is not something that needs to be forced. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 08:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Regardless, policy is policy, and no one is above it. So me just simply telling them they are violating it so they know doesn't hurt anyone. If you disagree with this person breaking the policy, go change it. — † Eloc † 08:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Quite simply, no. The mission of the wiki is above any policy, and the mission of this wiki is documenting the game of Guild Wars. Your actions are inhibiting that goal. If a policy is inhibiting that goal, it is null. Policies are designed to promote the goals of the wiki, not to subvert them, and using them for the latter is effectively trolling. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 08:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Aiiane. Nowhere in our policies does it say that policies are absolute or unbendable. Further, nowhere in our policies does it say that people are restricted by our policies -- in fact, our policy base lacks any concrete foundation whatsoever. The only thing I've consistently seen users uphold is an abstract idea of consensus. That consensus currently holds that one should assume good faith, in general. You have not assumed good faith with Lussh, and you have not acted in good faith toward his actions. To prevent further harassment and consensus violation, I'm blocking you for two days, Eloc. —Tanaric 08:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Guild Wars Wiki talk:Elections/2007-12 bureaucrat election#Final decision time

You behaviour there is not constructive, useful or in anyway helpful. Your behaiviour, both there and above, does not show you in a very good light. I suggest you either take a break from the wiki, or consider your actions more carefully. In a matter of three or so days, you have gone from helpful contributer to violating NPA and making snide remarks and comments. You are only making yourself look worse.-- br12 • (talk) • 20:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

that wasnt trolling...--Cursed Angel 20:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Who said anything about trolling? -- br12 • (talk) • 20:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

a guy on that page --Cursed Angel 20:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

My behavior there is not less constructive than the one from the ip user i believe, that's why i did it, because he seems to like "loosing time on useless details", that's my opinion.

I don't care a single second about what i look to anyone, the only thing i care is what i do for the wiki, wich means, nothing about talkings.

I haven't change "in a matter of three days", i despite stupidity and useless talkings ; while i didn't stop, and still add the information I'm getting, If you agree, fine, if you disagree, i don't care either.

And please believe that It cost me to stay polite both for the ip user who seem to know a lot about politic on the wiki, and what you're saying, that i would also qualify as "not constructive, useful or in anyway helpful".

I'm aware that when i "talk" i'm really good at getting everyone angry, please believe that my main goal is to imrove the wiki, not talk and fight with the others users. I just still sometimes look on talks pages, maybe i should'nt...--lussh 20:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I think it is good that you want to make the wiki better. However, I suggest you consider other people's opinions as well, instead of "not caring" about what some people say. At the end of the day, this is a wiki that anyone can and should use, not just one person's. Therefore, appreciate those people as well as appreciating your own work. Some people choose to contribute by adding content and images, such as yourself; but other users, like the IP on the page link above, contribute behind the scenes on the talk pages. And that is just as well.

Saying that you are no less constructive than the IP user isn't an excuse for non-constructive behaviour. -- br12 • (talk) • 20:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

lol u cant turn off that annoying "u have new messages" thing without looking at ur talk page can u? :D --Cursed Angel 20:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I disagree or don't understand, i appreciate work, not peoples, and i don't care about what happens "behind the scene", i care and i'll work in "front" only. (because i know my wonderfull diplomatic gift, wich is needed "behind the scene").

you said "At the end of the day, this is a wiki that anyone can and should use, not just one person's." i don't understand why you said that, you have the feeling i believe to be over the others or something like that ? If so, please believe that i don't have anything like that in mind.

for the "anonymous ip", i admit that finding what he said stupid and useless was not a reason to do the same myself, i acted over anger and it was indeed, useless and stupid, you have my apologies for that.--lussh 20:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your understand, Liche/Lussh, and your apology. I apologise myself if what I said made you think that I think that you think (O.o) you are above everyone, I did not mean that. What I meant by that was sometimes you might ... ignore what happens, as I said, behind the scenes.

I do not wish that this should stop you from contributing to the content as it is very helpful. br12 • (talk) • 21:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Old ascalon

Since the guideline is still in work i will no argue, but if you feel levels and classes are relevant and should be included in cases like this one, please add your input on Guild Wars Wiki talk:Formatting/Locations#Professions on Allied NPCS so it can be settled.--Fighterdoken 20:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Reconfirmations

Your statements are unclear on the reconfirmation pages, so I just want to make sure you're doing what you intend. By signing your name under "Requests for Reconfirmation", you're saying that you don't think Aiiane and I are supported by the community and you request another RfA to verify we should be allowed Sysop status. —Tanaric 03:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Then it's exactly the opposite of what i think, i'll strike it.--lussh 03:48, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

You're not the first person to be confused by our reconfirmations process -- I added extra explanation on the policy page to make it more clear for others. Thanks lussh. :) —Tanaric 03:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks--lussh 03:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Ahoy

from yer fellow pirate Yaryar --YARYAR the pirate 23:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion

Hey, when you tag an image with {{delete}}, could you add a reason as the first parameter? For example, {{delete|enter reason here}}.

Could you give me a reason for the deletion of Image:Sky Quickfeather map.jpg and Image:Gargoyles boss Location map.jpg please? Thanks-- Brains12 • Talk • 18:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

ok, i thought this was enough since the images were not used anymore ; it is the case for thoses two maps ; no pages links, and what they show is now found on a new map. sorry for the disturbance lussh 20:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Ah, thank you very much, and it's no disturbance :) -- Brains12 • Talk • 20:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

ara ara you're quick to answer ^^ lussh 20:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I watch Recent Changes too much ;) -- Brains12 • Talk • 21:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Festival Hat Screens

Hi, I see that you are the one who took the screenshots for this Wintersday's hats. The graphics on the ice crown have been updated, so could you make new screenshots reflecting this? (that is, if you still want your pictures on the page) --7hir7een 21:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

no prob, i'm on it (didn't knew they werre those changes ) lussh 21:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks like someone has already uploaded them. And it would be nice if we kept the old version, as someone said on the talk page, for archival reasons. -- Brains12 • Talk • 21:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

too late, and sorry if it sound arrogant, but i found my photo are better quality lussh 21:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem, your choice -- Brains12 • Talk • 21:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Moving

To move an article, you can use the "move" tab at the top of the page. This will keep the article history and make a redirect, which is mostly preferred over just copying the content over :) - anja 19:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

ok sorry lussh 22:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Despicable vs shut up

No hard feelings, but I made the 'shut up' comment only because of your use of 'despicable', which in my opinion was not warranted. I did NOT want to imply that you should shut up with the discussion. Discussion are good! OK? --  (CoRrRan / talk) 18:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

but always useless, i'm so tired lussh 18:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Image needed

Hey, just wanted to ask you if you could remove {{image needed}} tags off of pages that you upload images for. Thanks -- Brains12 • Talk • 20:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

ok, i just don't think about it, i'll be carefull lussh 20:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, it just helps to clean up Category:Image needed. -- Brains12 • Talk • 20:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

cleaned it a little lussh 22:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Great job ;) -- Brains12 • Talk • 22:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Info - if you see {{image needed|map}} it means a map image is needed, not a main image. You should leave those tags in if there isn't a map on the page. -- Brains12 • Talk • 16:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

i think that's what i do, i made mistakes ? lussh 17:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I thought I'd tell you after the reverting of Saidra, which needed a map. -- Brains12 • Talk • 17:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

it really does ? lussh 17:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, it would maybe need them for the places she's in a mission for, or a quest or something -- Brains12 • Talk • 17:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

i'm on it. lussh 17:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Nice ^^ -- Brains12 • Talk • 17:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Good job, lussh, they look cool :) -- Brains12 • Talk • 17:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Weapon screenshot page

User:Liche Screenshot licheweap.JPG was put up for deletion, but I don't think it should be deleted, so I replaced it with a move tag. If you like you can move it to another spot, otherwise just remove the move tag. I think the "problem" with the page was the .JPG ending, but I don't think it's a big deal. - BeX 03:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I changed the link to the image page, if you wish to put it on an actual user page, name the page User:Lussh/Licheweap. — ク Eloc 貢 03:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)