Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Lemming64/Archive 1

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Info-Logo.png Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions.

Lemming64[edit]

This request is for the sysophood of User:Lemming64 (talk • contribs).
Created by - BeX iawtc 01:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC).

Status[edit]

Accepted 01:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC).

Candidate statement[edit]

Thank you for the nomination. Just to sum up what I do here and why I do it; I am 100% focused on this Guild Wars Wiki and am all for making this the #1 place to come for information on GW. I really feel we have had an excellent first few months and I endeavour to keep it that way. My main area of contributions has come from watching for vandals, general house keeping activities (orphaned images is a little pet of mine), as well as creating and maintaining articles for areas I feel were a little neglected on Guildwiki eg. the miniatures section.

I live in the UK which would mean I am available in some of the more off-peak hours that most of the admin team is online and I have no other admin or maintenance based obligations that take away from my time here.

Thank you for reading this and happy editing :) --Lemming64 16:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Support[edit]

  1. Support. Lemming64 is one of those respected, hard working contributors and is always polite and friendly and willing to help other users out. I think he would make a fantastic sysop. - BeX iawtc 01:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Support. I feel that Lemming64 will make an excellent Admin -- Scourge User Scourge Spade.gif 01:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. Support. He is very concerned and will make an excellent Admin. --- Hanks Gotcha 18:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  4. Support. I feel he's handled himself very professionally on this wiki so far. HeWhoIsPale 18:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  5. Support. Great sysop potential. -- Gem (gem / talk) 20:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC) EDIT: I also strongly disagree with the opposing votes. I think that Lemmings acted properly on the linked discussion page. -- Gem (gem / talk) 07:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  6. Support. Lemming is super cool. LordBiro 20:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  7. Support. Lemming will be a great Sysop ;) poke | talk 21:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  8. Support. He provided some good technical info. And is interessed in Wiki development. -- M'vy | user | talk | -- 09:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  9. Support. Mostly because of how strongly I disagree with the oppose votes. I found Lemming64's actions, both in the linked instance and other places I've noticed him around, reasonable and in line with policy. - Tanetris 03:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  10. Support. Great knowledge of policies and always there to explain and enforce them. I think Lemming would be a great sysop. - anja talk 09:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  11. Support. Admirable; perfect for the position. --SnogratUser Snograt signature.png 20:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  12. Support. Looked through his contribs trying to find incriminating material, failed. While I am always a bit weary to support people I dont know since forever, all his edits hint at him being good admin material. --Xeeron 10:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  13. Well, might as well vote yes for you considering your the only one on this list who isn't a Sysop at Guildwiki.--§ Eloc § 03:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Oppose. His actions and responses on Guild talk:Dragon Killaz make me question his ability to be an effective admin. -Auron 00:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Oppose I agree with Auron. I don't think some of his actions, and responses i've seen are actions of an admin. --File:Rein Of Terror-sig.pngRein Of Terror (talk · contributions) 15:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. along the lines of what auron says — Skuld 08:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutral[edit]

  1. Neutral. Do not feel he has shown leadership when he has stepped in to resolve issues. --Karlos 23:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Request for Reconfirmation[edit]

  1. This sysop tends to grasp at straws and attempt to create policy violations when none exist. I have seen him do this numerous times -- at first I chalked it up to his newness to the role, but now I think he's genuinely unsuited for the position. —Tanaric 16:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
  2. Agreed with Tanaric, for the same reasons. Following policy and punishing vios is fine, but making vios up and punishing based on that is not. -Auron 01:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
  3. Agree again, he seems to want to punish violations that don't happen, he is very hypocritical, and doesn't act in good faith for the good of the wiki.--ChronicinabilitY User Chronicinability Spiteful Spirit.jpg 23:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  4. ^ — Skuld 23:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=Guild_Wars_Wiki:Requests_for_adminship/Lemming64/Archive_1&oldid=2661003"