User talk:Skakid9090/Archive 1

Revert

I must ask you to cease the revert war on Perv, it does not help resolve the issue --Lemming64 00:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Trying to get through with the user but he doesn't seem to listen, so I've stopped. - Skakid9090 00:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Ha?! Anyway Skadi you msged me in pm and I still don't know how to reply to people directly ;) Anyway, I have deleted 2 things, I'm not sure which one you're referring to but I'll explain both. First thing was Lamentation post/thread. Someone replied to my msg, I agreed with reply, deleted whole section (2 posts) because it became obsolete. Second thing i deleted was someones post which was an "I agree with previous poster"-thing, and it became obsolete because I took into account what that previous poster said and adjusted things accordingly. Thus, that post made absolutely no sense as it did not refer to anything existing. I guess i couldve kept it for historical purposes but is that really needed? I didn't remove anyones post because I disagreed with it, if i deleted something that's because I said "yes you're right, and someone else said it before which is still there; and i changed my post so now lets clean this up". If you're talking about something else pls point if up, but as you can see I didn't go into any killing spree of those who disagree with my opinions nor did I have any malicious intentions. Servant of Kali 18:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC) Fine, it's really not a problem for me leaving it. Servant of Kali 18:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

delete tagging

Just a note, for things copied from GuildWiki, you're better off using {{copyvio}}, rather than {{delete}} - it's a bit more informative, and it gives people the option to edit a temporary page to create a non-conflict version that can be substituted in. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 03:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

oh cool. thx for the tip - Skakid9090 04:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Sig

Stop using the unsigned template in your sig, its called UN-signed template for a reason ~ Kurd 21:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

is it against sig policy? no =) --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Skakid9090 . 22:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

See Guild_Wars_Wiki:Sign_your_comments#Length. Specifically, regarding signatures which exceed 30 characters when viewed on a talk page. While the current policy does not force you to comply, you could be considerate of your fellow wiki users, as the guidelines presented there aren't arbitrary, they do have a purpose behind them. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 20:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

thank you alot

thanks for the link i hope it works142.161.90.233 16:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

15th Title

You cannot get it, because you use Starburst */Duh Readem (talk*gwwcontribs) 05:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

starburst > readem.

Star Burst

Sever Artery

Gash

Sun and Moon Slash

Rush

Frenzy

Healing Signet

Resurrection Signet

—The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Skakid9090. 03:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Rlly, that build ownz. Readem Sorry, I'll stop trolling now. 23:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Hang your head in shame

No AB title nub. Readem Warning: Ignore this User if at all possible. 02:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

i haev r1 kurz and luxon u nub —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Skakid9090. 00:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

hai

Hi, Skakid. --Edru viransu 22:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

helloo —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Skakid9090. 23:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

DP reduces activation time and recharge time. --Edru viransu 01:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

oooh, interesting. —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Skakid9090. 01:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Sig (revisited)

While the signature policy does not provide hard limits for signature length, it does explicitly say to "keep your signature short," and it provides guidelines to assist you with that. You are well beyond the guidelines and people all around the wiki have complained about the length of your signature. You have thus far refused to change it. Thus, as an administrator, I am now telling you to change your signature or I will block you.

—Tanaric 06:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, we all appreciate it. —Tanaric 15:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Heh, changed it just a bit before you sent that =P — Skakid9090 20:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not intentionally antagonize others

Policy proposal discussion pages are for discussing the policy proposal, please be respectful and don't attempt to disrupt them for your own personal amusement. While elviondale may not be within his rights to remove content from a talk page, that content really shouldn't have been there in the first place. Please respect the goals of the wiki and restrain yourself from posting things that are disruptive of its processes. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 01:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Okay, please don't make any more idiotic policy proposals. =) — Skakid9090 01:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

It is perfectly possible to express your disagreement with a policy proposal without resorting to methods which are disruptive of wiki processes in general. Disliking a policy is not an excuse to troll. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 01:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

(conflict)That is your opinion of the policy proposals, not a fact. If you are not going to contribute to them in a positive way, whether for or against, I would ask that you don't at all. --Lemming 01:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

(double conflicT)I think it's unnecessary to say your opinion on profanity 4+ times on the same page, but I don't QQ about it. — Skakid9090 01:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

lulz. skadid owns. 99.235.230.36 22:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about the extra posts. The site was being very laggy again and despite being able to get everywhere else on the web with my average 8000 - 12000 kb/s connection, I could not get much of a responce from this site and when I did it was overboard. :p ~ J.Kougar 04:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah GWW was lagging terribly for a bit, I edit conflicted with myself a few times... -Auron 05:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

No need to be sorry. — Skakid9090 05:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

...

Ehh, thank god assassin's creed is coming out tomorrow, at least there I'll be able to play an assassin with a raep beam ability that isn't constantly brought down while never receiving changes that make the other crap they have at least somewhat attractive, I may have spoken a tad too much. --97.100.141.74 01:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Nerf what's good so they can only do SA? — Skakid9090 01:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

lol you're a friendly neighborhood troll :D --Cursed Angel 17:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

=D — Skakid9090 17:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

you're terrilbe, don't pollute my page with your garbage unless you have a good understanding of game balance and not the balance b/t pve whammos and aggro. Problem. 01:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

You suggest that Bull's Strike be buffed, please never talk again — Skakid9090 01:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Now where did you get this notion? You're bad and have no clue what you are talking about. All I did so far with my user page, was copy and paste skills and their descriptions, awaiting enough time to actually post what changes I'd like to see. Do note however, that none of those skills are Bull's Strike and that my changes include nerfs as well as buffs and also complete skill tweaks. Would you like to give being smart another try? Problem. 02:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

God skakid, leave him alone. All you're doing right now is trolling. If he thinks Bull's Strike should be buffed, then he can post that. Everyone is entitled to their opinion.--MP47 (talk) 02:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

NOt when he's going around being a douchebag and insulting everyone that comments on his talk page, when it's evident he has no clue what he's talking about when he buffs every bad skill and nerfs every good skill in the game. — Skakid9090 06:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

I really dont understand where you are coming from with "when he buffs every bad skill and nerfs every good skill in the game." I have made no suggestions as of yet, and my last list, mainly consisted of reworking underused skills to accomodate a diverse metagame. None of the changes in my last list, suggested they nerf a "good skill." Its pretty evident that you, along with any of your other buddies are just trolling, and when you get called on it, you have to come up with blank statements to "justify" your behavior. It's pretty clear that you haven't looked at anything I've previously suggested, and haven't looked at anything I've done currently. For the record, as previously stated, my current list is still a W.I.P and is just a copy and paste of current skills I'd like to see changed with their current skill descriptions. When I get the time, I will sit down, just like I did with my first list, and post what I'd like to see done. Then, and only then, can you make stupid and inaccurate statements like "he has no clue what he's talking about when he buffs every bad skill and nerfs every good skill in the game." I wonder if the mods will have a problem with this, as it really isn't a direct attack on you but a direct attack on your "argument." Problem. 19:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Some skills need to stay shit, if all skills we're balanced with each other the game would suck, all the top skill balancing things say that (e.g. magic the gathering) — Skakid9090 21:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, i don't like that there are some builds in GW that are simply good in general and that there are some skills that are nearly useless and orphaned. Why should some skills stay rubbish? Well, noone can do perfect balancing. Or did i missunderstand what you said? (btw, I also play magic and...

Spoiler alert: The following text contains spoilers relating to the story of a somehow OT comparison between GW and Magic The Gathering.

like the Legacy format most, as your cards like don't get banned someday as they get too old (like in Standard / Extended)...well unlike Legacy they have the advantage that the game does not have as powerful cards as it, but i don't prefer always buying now one :P but that cannot be really called a reason that Legacy is better...but well, lets get out of the offtopic-offtopic and back to offtopic (that again wants to make a comparison about GW/MtG balancing:) In Vintage, the best decks are in most cases either Black, Blue, or both...the broken cards are still allowed once, and as most broken cards are blue or black, that lets one get the best decks out of this bunch of restricted cards. That is what i do not like. Well, but afaik this changed today and they are now only allowed in 2HG. unfortunatly, unlike in gw, they do not change great things on cards like mana cost or the entire ability, only little erratas...so broken cards remain broken. but, as Anet can change skills as they want to, including all costs - and even the mechanic - i'd like to see every skill (nearly) as useful as the other. If you rly read this now, thx-a-lot ^^—ZerphaThe Improver 18:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

If all skills were balanced, most would have their own niche. This would make teams drift away from skill to a more rock-paper-scissors-like system. — Skakid HoHoHo 00:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

well...that's also right somehow. but this would also let the teams skills decide which one wins, wouldn't it? however, i dislike that some skills are nearly not played at all and that there are some other skills that are in every second build of the corresponding class simply because its so useful.

christmas sig

yay — Skakid HoHoHo 04:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Saul's Story

Would you mind using different phrasing for beating something in future please? There's really no need to use the word for a violent sexual attack. Thanks. -- Smarty 09:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

it's an mmo, mate — Skakid HoHoHo 20:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

You should have a look around about what the word means. Then maybe you might understand why it shouldn't be used as game slang. If you want to use it with friends who think it's appropriate then maybe that's the place for it. You should hold yourself to a certain standard here. Woop ‧ talk ‧ 21:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

It's a talk page, gimme a break. Antiarchangel 21:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Beat is also a word with quite an offensive meaning. As is kill. As is own. I suppose one could say complete, but really, how can one QQ about the terms used to describe a game whose entire gameplay is inherently offensive(murder is very offensive, imo)? --— Edru/QQ 03:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow

I can't believe how different you've become. I once knew you as one of the powerful editors, who was friendly and helpful. However, due to your recent responses to my posts, I'm starting to wonder where that Skakid went. Instead of helping the wiki, you've become an immature troll with answers that, honestly, seem fit for a 5-year-old child. I'm not sure who would consider "No u" a valid reply to my very serious question to Auron, nor to my request to not insult another user who was simply stating his opinions on the subject. Please, I'm asking this in the kindest possible way: Grow up.--MP47 (talk) 20:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

No u --Cursed Angel 20:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

I give up.--MP47 (talk) 20:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

I find it moderately ironic that you seem to ask other people to not insult other people and call Skakid an immature troll and childish. --Edru viransu 02:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes I know, it was moderately hypocritical of me, but how else can I get my point across?--MP47 (talk) 02:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I would not be surprised if Skakid felt that whatever insulting he has done was either the only or the best way to get his point across. --Edru viransu 03:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

"No u" is hardly a way to get a point across. At least when I'm rude, i have constructive criticism to give.--MP47 (talk) 03:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I say everyone just drops it, since this is the INTERNET and you don;t need to prove yourself to anybody, considering its just making extra drama no one needs and its pointless fighitng since neither side will let down. Heres a tip, stop while your ahead. Ajc2123

Still, I don't like Skakid either.reanor 03:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Lol, telling Gaile how much their skill icons suck isn't trolling? If you troll, expect to be trolled, it's troll code. — Skakid HoHoHo 20:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Please quote where I said that their skill icons suck. I didn't make that page, nor do I believe that it had any malicious intent toward GuildWars. I only brought it up to get a laugh out of people, as it's quite interesting (IMO) to see all the skills that have similar icons. I'm sorry if you took this the wrong way, however.--MP47 (talk) 20:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

yeh I guess I did. you should loosen up a bit imo, you're way too serious on a guild wars wiki. all these hearfelt speeches and apologies are pretty pointless, imo. — Skakid HoHoHo 20:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I can loosen up if I want to, but if I feel that the topic is serious, I'll also be serious.--MP47 (talk) 20:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I hate the seriousness of this wiki. PvX has a much better, non-serious attitude towards life. I used to be serious, until I realised it didnt help anything. In fact, nothing helps anything so happy days. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 03:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the kinda stuff you find a PvX. Its seriously awesome. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 03:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Imbed here imo. --71.229.204.25 03:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Revert

Your revert of Drunkard. Just FYI, there's no such thing as consensus being "primarily against". There is either consensus or no consensus, it's not a relative thing :) -- ab.er.rant 04:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

What I meant was, the consensus was generally that of that it isn't necessary on the page =/ — Skakid HoHoHo 04:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

I know what you meant :) Sorry, I was just being a prick and nitpicking on the words used because there's consensus or no consensus, not a primarily-against consensus. -- ab.er.rant 05:27, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't blame you, it's fun to do — Skakid HoHoHo 05:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Language

"Izzy is a twat and can't play the game without IWAYing so he doesn't nerf it." Is the obscene name-calling necessary? - HeWhoIsPale 20:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Twat is barely obscene compared to other names he could have called Izzy, but I agree that it is unnecessary. Calor (t) 20:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

ure all twats --Cursed Angel 20:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Your face. I'll tone it down just for you =). — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 22:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

sekzy signature :D — CurdiddlyMcAngediddles 13:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

lolol — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 20:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

thank you

Hi Thank You for the comment on our Guild Wiki page :) [PuBe] for the win

swords and hammers

lolol. be quick on that f1 and f2 99.235.230.36 17:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

No thanks

Personal attacks/trolling is still not appreciated. Please consider presenting your vote in a less trolling way. - anja 22:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

He really is dumb though. Like, he's not an intelligent person, which makes him dumb. — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 23:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey if you want to vent or express your opinion that's fine but just please don't do it here-- Ninja Dragon 23:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure I'm supposed to discuss my opinion on a matter on the RfA. — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 23:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)