ArenaNet talk:Skill feedback/PvE/Alkar's Alchemical Acid

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Info-Logo.png Note: As of September 2, 2009 this page is no longer active. If you have suggestions for Guild Wars skills please go to Feedback:Main to learn how to submit suggestions that ArenaNet can use.

100 AoE armor ignoring damage with cracked armor against a race that takes Virtually no damage at all. This is already a tac broken as far as pve skills go - why buff it further? -- NUKLEAR User NuclearVII signature 3.jpgIIV 16:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Because there was no tag on the dwarf rep that told me it was going to be mostly shitty support and melee buffs. Vael Victus Pancakes. 04:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Dwarf PvE skills are awesome. What you call shitty support I call weapon of the great dwarf. -- NUKLEAR User NuclearVII signature 3.jpgIIV 14:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Alright yes there are some goods ones, as there are bound to be, but I want more for casters. It seems like it's completely related only to asuran rank. Vael Victus Pancakes. 14:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the skill for casters. As an ele, it makes my sandstorm do damage. Besides, warriors can't use it with a 10e cost. -- NUKLEAR User NuclearVII signature 3.jpgIIV 08:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Great Dwarf armor is another skill that is useful to casters. This skill still deals armor ignoring damage to non-destroyers, so it's still a decent skill. I'd say keep it the way it is now. 145.94.74.23 12:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Decent? Clumsiness and Wandering Eye deal nearly twice as much damage. Elementalists and ritualists don't have armour ignoring area damage, but they have nukes such as Ancestors' Rage, Fireball, Spirit Rift with equal or better spammability and cost effectiveness and better damage against pretty much everything except rangers and a few monsters with specific elemental resistances. Against Destroyers, it's great, with heavy damage and a powerful condition. Against non-Destroyers, it has weak damage and no utility. -- User Gordon Ecker sig.png Gordon Ecker (talk) 02:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Not totally correct. ;) Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 10:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
You just said it Gordon. Against Destroyers, it's great. That's what it was meant for, and nothing more. 145.94.74.23 09:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
But...but...it's a PvE skill! So clearly it needs to cause cracked armor to all foes, and a Deep Wound vs Destroyers?! D: Vili User talk:Vili 10:12, 2 December 2008 (UTC)