Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Anja Astor/Archive 1

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Info-Logo.png Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions.

Anja Astor[edit]

This request is for the sysophood of User:Anja Astor (talkcontribs).
Created by Dirigible 15:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

Result[edit]

Accepted 17:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC).

Candidate statement[edit]

I don't know what should be included in a candidate statement, but here we go..

I feel the most important thing is to keep the wiki a nice place for the users, new as well as experienced. This is, in my opinion, best done with clear rules, good explanations and policies behind your actions and discussions. I do spend alot of time on the wiki and alot of that time is also spent reading policy discussions, spotting vandals and trying to help new editors get used to our policies. I believe in "assuming good faith" and I think friendliness is the way to go. As a sysop, I would be careful about my actions, but I see this as a big opportunity for me to help the wiki stay nice, clean and welcoming to all users.

- anja talk 14:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Support[edit]

  1. Support. Over the last few months here on the wiki, my impression of Anja has been that of a very positive contributor, always patient and helpful towards new users, as well as coolheaded and active in the various discussions that have taken place on the GWW. --Dirigible 15:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Support. I haven't been around as much as I would like recently, but every time I pop in I see Anja working hard and trying to help people out. --Rainith 16:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. Support. This is a few days since I've came across the wiki, but I've frequently seen Anja around in recent changes. This is a good point for an admin. -- M'vy | user | talk | -- 16:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  4. Support. Anja is one of the best contributors on this wiki. poke | talk 18:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  5. Support. Works harder than I do. —Tanaric 21:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  6. Support. Excellent contributor and always helpful to other new (and old) contributors. -- CoRrRan (CoRrRan / talk) 21:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  7. Support. There are a number of people that have been instrumental in producing such a high quality wiki in such a short time, and Anja is one of them. LordBiro 21:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  8. Support. What everyone else has said and more. An ideal candidate for adminship. SnogratUser Snograt signature.png 22:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  9. Support. Contributes a great deal to the wiki and a great choice for adminship --Gummy Joe 22:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  10. Support. Anja is very pro-active and is an asset to the wiki, a great choice. --Lemming64 22:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  11. Support. There's not much more I can say that hasn't been already said. She is a great choice for an admin. -- Scourge User Scourge Spade.gif 01:33, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  12. Support. I've worked extensively with Anja on this wiki and at GuildWiki and have found her to be an extremely dedicated and self-sacrificing contributor. There are only a handful of people who work as hard as Anja does! - BeX iawtc 09:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  13. Support. Anja is a busy contributor and very helpful to new users. -- ab.er.rant sig 16:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  14. full Support. - MSorglos (talk|contrib) 17:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  15. Support. As above. --Indecision 03:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  16. Support. Look at Recent Changes, probably 2 out of 5 edits is from Anja :P, Plus shes a great person ;)~ KurdKurdsig.png 10:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  17. Support. Stayed calm even after I reported her to Tanaric on the old Wiki, because I thought she is going to totally mess up the armor section, which was wrong of course. Also contributes a lot, so I would even say she is probably the best of the many admin candidates. --Longasc 22:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  18. Support. Very helpful to new users, a very good example of how an Admin should be. Erasculio 14:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  19. Support. Helpful. Gives good explanations. Seems to understand policies. Trustworthy. --Rezyk 22:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  20. Support. Cooperative and enthusiastic contributor.--Bane of Worlds (talkcontribs) 13:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. ..


Neutral[edit]

  1. Neutral. Basically unknown to me but what I've seen is good. User Blastedt sig.jpgBLASTEDT 15:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


Request for Reconfirmation[edit]

  1. ...