User talk:Skuld/Archive

Dude!!!!!!!!!...... Glad you could join us!!! :D :D ~ Kurd 12:51, 7 February 2007 (PST)

Thanks :) If we're rid of the blasted builds section and back to doing what we do best, i'm all for it :D — Skuld 13:49, 7 February 2007 (PST)

Hah I see you stole my Example. I was about to go upload my rotwing and I looked on guildwiki for it and saw that it was replaced. Apperently someone downloaded my version and uploaded thiers (same picture edited) all grainy and crappy looking and then someone else uploaded over that one. Oh well. --Draygo Korvan 09:19, 8 February 2007 (PST)

here you go BlastedtGuildWiki page 14:58, 12 February 2007 (PST)

Heyas Skuld, good to see you're still around Wiki --Makkert 02:44, 18 February 2007 (PST)

Brawr! :P

Herro, Skulkd! Even though we may disagree that Iron Mist and Spirit Rift can be useful together, I think we can agree that there are still many articles on GWiki and presumably articles-in-progress on this new Wiki that will need grammatical revision. That being said, I'd greatly appreciate it if you could drop by my Talk and let me know which things need heavy revision so that GWiki (or this new Wiki) can be easier to read and more useful. Preferably often ;) GrammarNazi 11:49, 11 February 2007 (PST)

Oh noes! You don't know of any? Well, I just found one at Knock Down on this Wiki. Take a look at the history to see what sort of thing I do on GWiki. Thanks! GrammarNazi 12:22, 11 February 2007 (PST)

Movemen/Movement/ovementMay/tnemevoM Controls

Howdy Skuld. Recently you moved the Movement Controls article to "Movemen controls". I assume you were simply lowercasing the C in "controls" and accidentally omitted the T, but I'll let you fix it incase you had other intentions. Just a head's up. -Eldin 14:49, 11 February 2007 (PST)

Movement Contols to Movemen controls, which one of us is smarter? :D — Skuld 15:00, 11 February 2007 (PST)

Wanna help me with Tahnnakai Temple?

Pleasies? Thankies BlastedtGuildWiki page 14:50, 12 February 2007 (PST)

You already asked me that! — Skuld 14:53, 12 February 2007 (PST)

I clicked and pressed enter at the same time, nubbypie :P BlastedtGuildWiki page 14:56, 12 February 2007 (PST)

JR DOWN

How did my screenie get here? O_o -Lemming

By the wonders of internet! — Skuld 10:41, 14 February 2007 (PST)

I have one lying around from the same obs session that featured individuals discussing Mr. Gray's consumption of human infants. I'll upload it some other time. -Lemming

(<waves>)

Hi! GrammarNazi 09:57, 18 February 2007 (PST)

Great site but when will the policies be approved or be completed? Will it ever get going? What will happen to Guildwiki?Anyways, nice meeting ya--Operationx303 09:58, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Monsterbox Formatting

Howdy (again) Skuld. A while ago you edited Vizier Khilbron so that his monsterbox had the red X profession icon. I thought nothing of it and reverted it. I noticed you did this with Undead Prince Rurik too, though. I can't find it anywhere in the policies, but do we plan to show profession icons in monsterboxes or no? If not, perhaps showing no icon instead of the red X icon is more fitting? Also, do we plan on linking other monsterbox information (such as species, profession, etc) to their respective articles? I haven't seen this done anywhere, and I haven't done this either, though doesn't it seem a bit more practical if we make the species in the monsterbox link to its respective article? Let me know what you think. File:Esig2.jpg Eldin 16:03, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

I changed the monster box to auto-show an icon without needing any code, but someone changes it back without fixing all the changes I did. See here for the full list — Skuld 16:43, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

---

FYI: re: "Bad Barek" in edit summary - I'm not the one who inserted the "DEL" tag, I just moved the one to fix the indent. I think it was LordBiro who inserted it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 11:12, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

Bad Biro! — Skuld 11:13, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

I was intending to hide the truth from Gem. It was comedy and that means my behaviour is automatically permitted! LordBiro 11:21, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

JR down

I just wondered... What exactly does that mean? ~ dragon legacy 17:01, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

Stealing, eh?

Everybody who is/was in Ttgr now steals from others, as you stole that Userbox from me, and I stole it from Auron. As far as I know, you and I are the only Ttgr members on here for the time being. Henry of Navarre 16:48, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

Nuvola icons

Since you had a problem with the icon set that I've been using for the Help: pages (Nuvola icons), I've messed around with a couple other ideas - take a look at Help talk:Contents and let me know what you think. Thanks! MisterPepe talk 18:27, 29 April 2007 (EDT)

Guild Navibox

What was the point in changing the information? --Jamie 07:45, 10 May 2007 (EDT)

Fugly guild names, changed to something less personal — Skuld 07:46, 10 May 2007 (EDT)

Oh Skuld...

Your optimism is overwhelming. —Tanaric 10:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Rude Was Skuldude...

Howdy, please ease off on the obnoxiousness-flavored gatorade. In less than 10 lines you say "Fire the Devs" tell a guy to shut up and then tell the ame guy he's clueless and then in the next section tell the guy he doesn't deserve to cap. Slow down a bit sir, or step away from discussions till you are in a better mood. I find a bunch of issues with the suggested updates as well. Just be mindful that the other users are not the ones who made the updates. If you don't want "clueless people" to get on your conversations with Gaile, call her on the phone or something. --Karlos 14:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

sure, sorry — Skuld 17:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Final warning

Your actions and posts are getting out of hands. Scrolling through all of your talk page archives after the point when you were demoted from sysophood one will mostly find complaints about things you do and say. Even though you are a former sysop, that doesn't give you permission to do what you want and break policies. I'm sorry, but I'm forced to warn you for the last time. -- (gem / talk) 20:23, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Remember that this is not GuildWiki Gem. — Skuld 07:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

In addition, don't be so dense as to think that I think because [blah blah blah] I can do what I want. — Skuld 08:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Even if I might be wrong with what I think are the causes, your actions are not acceptable. You've directly violated policies multiple times and gotten out with it every time. -- (gem / talk) 08:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Thats great, but what the hell are you talking about? — Skuld 08:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

There's a lot to pick from. I guess the most recent one is the repeated removal of a deletion tag on an article even though the deletion was still under discussion. Removing a tag is only allowed if the discussion has ended and the decision is to delete the article, not if the discussion is still running and deletion seems most likely. -- (gem / talk) 11:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Gem, what are you talking about? Please link to a page or something. --Karlos 11:53, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm so sorry, but I've allready forgot the article name, and as I've deleted it it's hard to find which one it was. I'll try to look for it later today if you want a link to this single case, but if you'll just look through the stuff posted on Skulds talk page and talk page archives, you'll see what I'm talking about generally. -- (gem / talk) 12:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Hard evidence or GTFO. — Skuld 10:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Lol whatever. :D -- (gem / talk) 10:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Needs less harassment tbh -Auron 10:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

You removed the delete tag on GWP with some stupid reason whilst it was still under discussion and it was perfectly justified for deletion. --Lemming64 10:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

That breaks which policy exactly? -Auron 11:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

(reset indent)

Ok, I reviewed Skuld's contributions, disregarding the deletion tag, since I couldn't find anything regarding removing the deletion tag. While I don't agree with being rude or obnoxious towards others, none of his contributions violate any policies currently found on GWW. Basically the only thing anyone could accuse Skuld of doing is acting his age, which isn't against policy. If he or anyone does break a policy, list an example and if you want, the policy for which you think it violates. — Gares 11:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you Gares <3 — Skuld 11:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

I think Gem's final warning is unwarraned, for the record. --Karlos 13:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. Such a warning is probably warranted over on the GuildWiki, but not here, as far as I can tell. Gem, if you care to push the case further, please provide links to examples of Skuld's (mis)behavior, so the rest of us can approach this from the same perspective you are.

Also, I agree with Skuld that removing a delete tag does not break any wiki policy.

—Tanaric 22:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Hmm...

What is up with you and Eloc? Perhaps it would be best to simply ignore each other, as the latter parts of GWW:NPA suggest? (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 23:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Naptime

I blocked you for three days. I look forward to seeing your unique brand of constructive criticism after your block expires. Please don't tell sysops to shut up -- especially new sysops who don't have any reason to like you. :) —Tanaric 19:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou for that Tanaric, I was away on vacation whilst that happened. --Lemming64 15:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Karlos and Xasxas expressed concern over the block on my talk page. If you feel the block was warranted, feel free to discuss it with them. —Tanaric 17:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Listen up...

Just so you don't think you got a "free pass." Tellin someone to "shut up" is, as it stands now, a personal attack. You need to drop it out of your arsenal of persuasive arguments and you need to not shut off debate. Shutting off debate means you're either a bully or you're weak or both. If you do not have regard for people's opinions, then why discuss things?

I challenged Tanaric's block for reasons entirely different than whether or not you are guilty. I challenged him because of the "John Wayne" style in which he blocked "don't tell an admin to shut up, especially one who doesn't have any reason to like you" is a statement that reeks of arrogance, it reeks of believing admins are special users who are owed more respect and it reeks of believing that when an admin "likes you" he should treat you better than if he doesn't "like you."

All of these were blatantly obvious, and conflicted to a great deal with the "Admins are just janitors" chorus that was being sung during my reconfirmation. I was not gonna let him get away with that double standard. Unfortunately, he did another very unadmin thing which is to unblock you (as if the block itself had no grounds, as if you did not break GWW:NPA) then make a patronizing snide remark about me going into a power struggle with him. i.e. doing me a favor of some sort.

So, I don't know if other admins are going to look into your case or whether or not you'll be blocked. It appears to me that the admin crew here has no idea how to handle these kinds of things and there's no semblence of leadership between them, however, I wanted you to understand that you're going to get blocked with stuff like "shut up" and "you disguist me" sooner or later. You need a change in attitude. If you post in here, it should be to debate, not to tell people off. If you do NOT want to hear the other side's opinion, then don't go posting in their talk pages. And as a personal advice, just ignore Eloc completely. Your "rivalry" with him is giving him a lot more spotlight than his glorious edits could ever do. --Karlos 22:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

I looked into skuld's edits before and I fully agree with Lemming64's orignial statement. It is very close to breaking NPA. I would not have blocked him for that personally, but I did not find the block overly harsh either. Just try to not get involved into any shouting matches in the future. --Xeeron 22:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)