Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Barek

Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions.

Barek

This request is for the reconfirmation of User:Barek (talk • contribs).
Created by --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC).

Result

Successful. 00:11, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Candidate statement

This is a voluntary reconfirmation request of my sysop status, in advance of the reconfirmation timeline that is still being established. The grandfathered sysops helped this wiki bridge the gap of needing someone in that position in its early stages. Now that this wiki community has RFA’d its own sysops, I voluntarily place myself up for reconfirmation.

Just as Tanaric had done on his reconfirmation, I will not argue for or against my deserving sysop status. The decision should not be based on my testimony; but instead on my contributions and the community's opinion of if continued value exists in maintaining my sysop status.
--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

1. A great sysop helping both GuildWiki and the official wiki with his actions. -- (gem / talk) 19:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
2. Support. I've only found positive things about Barek. - anja 19:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
3. Support. I feel that Barek is a great sysop and should remain in the position. --Lemming64 19:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
4. Support. Barek is a needed quantity --Snograt 20:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
5. Support. Among the most balanced and reasonable members of the wiki, he has done a great job as admin. --Xeeron 21:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
6. Support. Barek is a very good admin. poke | talk 22:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
7. Support. Barek has shown his value and he should keep his sysop status. --  (CoRrRan / talk) 23:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
8. Support. The ultimate rules guy. He knows the rules and he enforces them and sticks by them. He is also wise and even-tempered and does not just enforce the rules blindly. --Karlos 23:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
9. Support. Always helpful, calm, fair and sensible in his words and actions. --Dirigible 01:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
10. Support. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 01:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
11. Support. -Auron 01:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
12. — Skuld 08:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
13. Support. Probably the single best sysop I've worked with on any wiki. —Tanaric 08:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
14. Support. An excellent sysop, always has been and I can't see that changing. --Xasxas256 13:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
15. Support. Barek is fantastic. LordBiro 19:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
16. Support. -- Scourge 21:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
17. Support. Calm and fair. As long as he's seen to be active here, it doesn't matter where else he's also a sysop or admin or moderator. -- ab.er.rant 02:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
18. Support. Was sure I already voted on this but I don't see a camel. - BeX 02:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
19. Support Not much I can say that hasn't already been said, so I will just add my vote. — Gares 12:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
20. Support Calm, helpful, and a fair sysop.--Bane of Worlds (talk • contribs) 14:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Although he is a good Sysop, I don't like the idea of him being sysop of 2 wikis. I think a sysop here should be only a sysop here and should be entirely devoted.--§ Eloc § 09:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

1. ...

Request for Reconfirmation

1. ...