Guild Wars Wiki:Projects/Featured pages

Featured pages

[edit] The procedure

To nominate a page to be featured on the Main Page, add it to the nominated pages section on this page. When nominating pages, please consider if the page you are nominating is good enough to be featured on the Main Page. If you do not believe the article is good enough, please refrain from nominating it and work on improving it instead. Nominated articles should be discussed on this page. When consensus has been reached in favor of the article, the section with the discussion about that article should be moved to the accepted pages section, and a time stamp displaying when the article has been accepted should be added. If an article has been rejected by the community, it should be removed from the nominated pages list. Articles should be moved into their respective sections (accepted/rejected) when there has not been comments about it for a month or longer.

If an article has been featured on the Main Page for more than two weeks and there are pages in the accepted pages section, the current featured page (if any) should be replaced with the first accepted article in the accepted pages section. This new article is to be tagged with the Template:Featured article and will be featured on the Main Page for at least two weeks, after which it can be replaced with a new accepted article.

There are no requirements for featured pages. Whether an article will be featured or not is based solely on consensus in the discussion on this page.

The current featured page can be found at Main Page/featured article. The next featured page should be formatted at Main Page/featured article/next before it is rotated in.

Note: Pages nominated prior to April 29, 2009, have been moved to this archive. If you wish to nominate one of these pages, please move them out of the archive back to this page.

[edit] Nominated pages

[edit] Miniature

Its fun, kinda random, and would make a good featured article. I was thinking if possible using a single miniature for the picture, such as the rendered picture for the black moa chick, or the gwen doll one from April fools day.--Venture 20:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

I support that! It's a little long, but well-written, informative, and something that people would go, "Hey, I want to know more about that!" in my opinion. MiraLantis 19:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't know... large part of the page is just a list of miniatures... - J.P.Talk 14:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Having mostly being lists shouldn't mean it shouldn't be accepted. I vote in favor because it is useful for mini collectors and new players. -- Azazel the Assassin/talk 00:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

It's got long lists, but some good info too. We could do it, I think. — Why 02:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

i vote yes and agree on changing the image maybe just compiling all the renders together. or adding the borders that gale gray has on her page.-- Zesbeer 22:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree to this page as it is. People haven't had problems with the images on it in the past. -- riyen ♥ 17:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

no one has a problems with the images i think its just we want to clean up the page before we feature it.- Zesbeer 22:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

If know one has a problem with it I will move it too the accepted part on 1 november 19:00:00 (UTC) --Wysth 18:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

No one has a problem. Page is good as is, enough information, etc. -- riyen ♥ 18:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

i have a problem with the image ill change it and clean up the article.- Zesbeer 22:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Image has been there since 29 March 2007. No one has had a problem with it for a couple of years. If you do, please discuss it in the talk page, before changing the image to your liking. -- riyen ♥ 22:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Okay I won't move it until Zesbeer has done his work on it.--Wysth 16:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Dance

Would need collector editon's dances, the devourer dance and some references from where the dances are wich we can ask to linsey but otherwise a fun article to read and certainly to watch :) Rhonin Soren 20:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

the text also needs editing for consistency. but yeah, if we can get the issues resolved, this would be a fun page to feature. --VVong|BA 22:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

While it has some nice information and animations, the page itself is damn ugly with all the white spaces in it.. — Why 02:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

i wouldnt say damn ugly but it dose need some imporvement and its also missing images for the bonus dances and for abandon.-- Zesbeer 22:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Zesbeer it is not really a article, it is more a list of all dances and stuff. Not really text. the page is build on the pictures wich is good for this subject, but I dont think we should feature it. I would love to hear someones opion.--Yours faithfully Wysth 17:52, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

I don't see this page being plausible. I think it needs more work done to it. -- riyen ♥ 17:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Snare (tactic)

A good tactic to use that many, especially PvE players (and it is helpful in PvE, especially with NPCs that run in circles), ignore and forget about. Also seems to be complete and well rounded for both PvP and PvE. -- Konig/talk 04:55, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Indeed it looks good but we need a picture if we want it too be featured. And i have no clue how we could get a picture about someone going slower. Thats kinda hard to get in a picture.--Wysth 17:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

How about a render of someone with the cripple condition? Maybe my memory is failing but I seem to recall a distinct limp. Misery 17:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

An image would make it look better on the main page, but if the page is good without images, I say go ahead and feature it without any images, or something. Or simply add the Cripple-icon to the featured article bit on the main page. No need to go making up images on the page we want to feature, unless they actually add something to the page itself. A render of a crippled person would be rather funny, but which npc/pc do we want to use? — Why 20:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

I dont think that would matter but to I suggest a warrior because, if you sare them they are really wourthless. so how about Thom the bravelar Henchmen.--Yours faithfully Wysth 17:48, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Only problem is, this page lacks an image, but the information is good. -- riyen ♥ 17:38, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Polymock

Accurate and complete. -- Konig/talk 04:55, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

agreed but i think that it needs a new image.. ill work on something for that also do we want to feature something that people only really do once?-- Zesbeer 22:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I dont see why that could be a argument against feature since the lore article is of no importance too the game accept that it is intresting. I find this article very well written and explains I think everything you need to know i agree on the picture though we need a new one.--Wysth 19:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

I must admit I haven't quite read the entire page yet, but at a glance it looks okay. Will try to give some more feedback tomorrow. — Why 22:08, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

I would love to have someones opion on this page. I think it is a very nice page with something that could use some attention. I dont think it is good if we move this page to the accepted area without at least more people saying they agree with it.--Wysth 16:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

i disagree with it only because you only do polymock once per toon.- Zesbeer 20:41, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Not necessarily, you do the quests once, but you can do the polymock tournament anytime you wish afterwards. Just because you don't see people farming it like the Norn Tournament or Dwarven Boxing, doesn't mean every person only does the quests. -- Konig/talk 21:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

yea but its not worth it to do the quests over again when you can raptor farm or just vanquish and get a lot more rep also its not very fun...- Zesbeer 21:23, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

I think it is a bad idea to determine featuring (or dont featuring) a article beceause it is in the game very interresting or it is not. We should first look if the article is good and interresting and has everything it takes then we can start talking about what is interresting in the game or not. I think featuring this artcle is a good job just because it is a part of guildwars that is not played very much, it could give some more attention to it.--Wysth 13:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

I think this would be a good page to display as you can do the polymock more than once. It would get some interested in this mini-game. -- riyen ♥ 17:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Is there anyone that has a problem if I move this page too the acceped part?--Wysth 08:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) The article is good, but really needs another picture. But I must admit, that I have no real idea what picture can be used. I have alreadythink about this, but did not find a solution. A picture from the arena is already with the specific areana and I did not get a good looking combination. So for short: I think it needs a better picture, but I have no clue what kind of picture is appropriate.Balwin 18:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

What about a lineup, like the profession page, either of the forms, or of the pieces (a subset, of course, since there are so many). -- FreedomBound 18:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Thats right it needs a picture I always forget to look at that. I think the line up is good can you make that picture Freedom?--Wysth 19:43, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Ha! No. Unless you want it done in MS Paint. :) -- FreedomBound 19:47, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I dont think that will work sadly I cant do it either.--Wysth 13:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Thankfully, Jette accepts cookies, so he made this. Not quite what I had in mind, but it's very nice. -- FreedomBound 18:41, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Taking the idea from FreedomBound I created this picture. I don't know, if it would be good enough.Balwin 20:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

It is a nice picture Baldwin but I like Jette's one better but I think there is room for more then one picture on the page. If you want too add it please ask also on the talk page of the Polymock page itself.--Wysth 12:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I'd say, now this page is ready to be accepted. Any more objections? -- Konig/talk 09:54, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

No it looks fantasict Well done.--Wysth 18:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) But now there is a discussion the its talk page, if the pictures are good enough. See here. :) Balwin 18:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I think the page is good enough now atleast it has the standards we wanted on this page. I will post a page on the Polymock talk page too about this article beeing featured but for now I think we can move it too the accepted part. Please let me know if someone has a problem with that.--Wysth 18:38, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

I also left a message on the polymock talkpage so people know we have reached consensus.--Wysth 13:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

I think it is good now, but my opinion may be biased :) Balwin 16:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

I vehemently oppose the five-skill image. It looks good, but it's nonsensical. Let's take it out and then accept it. The lined-up polymock avatars are fine. But if consensus is in favor of featuring it with the fabricated fiveskill image, go ahead and ignore this message, I will not halt progress. — Why 16:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

The lineup won't fit well in the featured section, I think. I like the skill mesh myself - though it is not very polymock-specific (that being, the skill icons are, obviously, used elsewhere so too could the picture be used elsewhere). But it is good enough. -- Konig/talk 17:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Sorrow's Furnace

A perfect example of what an explorable area page should look like. --94.171.77.82 14:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

its a nice article but it feels like it needs a little more.- Zesbeer 20:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Not really something great for display, nor is any explorable page really 'perfect'. ♥ Ariyen ♀ 22:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I Don't think this page has enough tekst to fill up the front page and I don't think we can gather enough information either so I vote against--Wysth 19:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, it is complete, and there is enough text, I think, to fill the spot. So, I'm for it. -- Konig/talk 21:06, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

I dont really think there is enough tekst but if you think we should do it put it in the accpted part you have my blessing.--Wysth 11:12, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

It really doesn't have enough information to be displayed on the front page. One of the problems is it doesn't seem to have that much 'lore' or 'detail' about the area. I vote against this page. It's lacking a little bit, because it doesn't offer enough information. -- riyen ♥ 16:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

GOOD IDEA! this is a good area of the game but is rarly used! N122333

I agree with N122333 for it beeing a good idea but I dont think the pages is good enough too be featured. That brings us to the next question how do we improve it so we can feature it?--Wysth 09:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

that's alot question marks in there! --neyira = ? 19:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

What do you mean with a lot of question marks?--Wysth 13:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Allied NPC's HM levels. -- Konig/talk 13:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Title

I think this is a very interesting page for al users it not only explains a part of the game that most players use i also gives a good picture on wich titles you can acieve and how much variety there is in guildwars. The only problem will be what do we do with the picture on the front page there is non on this pages can we create one? I dont spot red links anywhere. --Wysth 19:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

I see what you mean. A picture of the hero panel (preferably with gwamm) would be apt for the page but that still wouldn't make a very nice front page pic. Tidas 13:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

True thats why i was think about a picture of someobe where you can see the title tag under his name. But i dont know if we can use a picture directly from guildwars because of cpyrights and stuf.--Wysth 05:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Like with the Nicholas suggestion, I think we should avoid articles which are always on the front page. At least for now. -- Konig/talk 05:38, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

With the difference that Title is a good article if you ask me and it doesn't have a prominent place on the frontpage it just is between the other stuff. HWere nicholas has his almost his own colom and it jumps out. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Wysth (talk).

i would rather feature the individual titles, though i dont think there is enough info on the pages to do that...- Zesbeer 22:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

I agree with you on featuring all the titles but i dont think that is do able so the main page would be a start wont it.--Yours faithfully Wysth 12:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

I think this would be alright as it would help those with titles. Also an idea for a photo would be of someone who has maxed out a few titles. -- riyen ♥ 17:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Mursaat

this page is rather good though i think if we could add in some of the info that is on the guild wars 2 wiki page it would be even better. i don't know how the licensing works for that but eh.- Zesbeer 03:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

You can't back add if it has nothing to do with the original GW series. — Seru Talk 03:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

did you read the page? it has everything to do with the mursaat in guildwars1- Zesbeer 03:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Mursaat <-- Guess that page does have a good story on it =] Think most of it can be added. — Seru Talk 04:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

If the page gets revamped with the lore, then yes. I'm (slowly) working on revamping various different articles with the lore information, I'd love for someone else to take this off of the long list. :P For the paraphrasing of the GW2W article, only up to "The Veil Falls" should be included. Maybe part of the "Return of the Unseen Ones" section, and of course, replacing current info (since it's the same info just expanded) and with spoilers. -- Konig/talk 04:25, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

@konig des todes i would love to help with that i just get overwhelmed sometimes at how much there is to be done. also whats the rules for using info from the guild wars2 wiki? would it be copy right infringement? i dont know exactly how that works.- Zesbeer 21:57, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

As far as I know, it cannot be word for word, and then there is the "pertaining to GW1/2 only" rule. I think all that on the Mursaat page is a bit much for the GW1W article for the Mursaat, as well. So be sure to take out anything that doesn't really pertain to GW1's time. -- Konig/talk 23:36, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

when i asked wyn about it here she said it was compatible to copy. because they share the same licensing.- Zesbeer 01:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

I disagree. Not enough information and to copy Guild Wars 2 into this article is not acceptable. Separate times, etc. Characters can be changed from Guild Wars 1 to Guild Wars 2. Guild Wars 1 has it's own timeline as Guild Wars 2 will have it's own timeline and stories. -- riyen ♥ 16:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Ariyen, most of the information from the GW2W on the Mursaat, in fact all of it, is from GW1 or this wiki. -- Konig/talk 19:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Then why not update this one to fit the in game? -- riyen ♥ 20:06, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Ariyen it is acceptable to copy the guild wars 2 info we just discussed that above. and it is probably time i haven't had the time and i don't think konig des todes has either your more then welcome to go and edit the page.- Zesbeer 22:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Not a lot of people care for the lore on the wiki, unfortunately. I have been (slowly) rewriting articles to have accurate and more lore on them. However, I have not gotten to it, nor had time to get to the Mursaat article. -- Konig/talk 23:55, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

It's okay, Konig. Just get to it when you want/can. No one is in a 'hurry' or shouldn't be. Real life comes first. -- riyen ♥ 18:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

instead of just commenting on everything you could actually work on the article your self.- Zesbeer 21:50, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

I have other things to do besides that article. Also, I don't do lore much, I prefer to contribute in other ways. Instead of replying as well, why don't you work on it? -- riyen ♥ 22:02, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

oh look at that i am L2history i was also working on the rework for the vanquishing tables.- Zesbeer 22:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Tables don't need rework, but better post your 'ideas' in a subpage and suggest it in the talk page there. -- riyen ♥ 22:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

i think they do please stay on topic thanks also i already made a comment about the tables on the vanquishing page. back on topic ill try and add the lore from the guild wars 2 page latter.- Zesbeer 22:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Attribute

im only suggesting this page it might be more fitting to do the attribute quest page, i just think it would be useful to feature one of these pages because a lot of players don't know about the fact that pve toons don't have all there attribute points until after they do the quests.- Zesbeer 22:03, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

I think if we want to feature a page because of what you say we can better feature the attribute piont page don't we?--Wysth 12:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

I think that the Attributes description it's self needs more work, before we display this page. -- riyen ♥ 17:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Dhuum

Along with the new updates and stuff. could encourage more people to try uw, although i don't want to pug with noobs. so, is this page goes through, NOOBS LEARN BEFORE YOU ATTEMPT UW!!!! --Jrhsk8 01:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

It is a nice and interresting page, Well written and indeed interresting for people who never finished UW. But before we can feature it the banner must be gone. We can only feature articles that are complete.--Wysth 08:18, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Too turbulent. Try again in half a year when the page is stable. — Why 01:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

IDK what's so "turbulent" about it. but whatever it is, i can clean it up because i really think n00bs have a right to know what's happening in uw too. --98.145.73.93 03:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

^ i wrote that. --Jrhsk8 03:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

They sure have, but at this moment the page is being edited (almost) daily. I think it's best if we wait until there is a stable version of the page that we can show off. If people want to know what's happening in UW, we have the Underworld article for that. The Featured pages project is not about informing people, it's about recognizing pages that are of very high quality, and as it is now, in my opinion this page is both too short and too unstable. — Why 04:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

@why i thought a part of it was about informing people about stuff in the game that they wouldn't normally see but also to show off pages that are well made, and not normally visited- Zesbeer 04:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Zesbeer. This page is visited often. -- riyen ♥ 04:30, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

By the time this page gets featured, it will be 5 weeks - as we have two before it. By then, the article should be full. Pages do not have to be long for them to be featured - don't know why you say that Why - so the Dhuum article is not too short if it has all the info we have on it. Which the only thing missing is anything unnoticed in the battle with Dhuum (for now). By the time it would be featured, anything currently unnoticed will most likely be noticed and put onto the page. I'd say we could probably remove the stub on that page soon, as so many people have been doing him and updating the page. Give it a week, this page should be stable and complete - so in 5, definably worthy of being featured. -- Konig/talk 09:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I do no think this page should be featured...yet...let it become more complete. -- Lacky 10:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm perfectly OK with featuring pages that are interesting and relevant to the current hype in game, but that doesn't mean we should lower our standards for accepting pages. What I'm missing on this page is tactics on how to defeat him (either write some skill suggestions, see talk:Dhuum for instance, or refer to the quest. A "Tactics" section would be most appreciated), a map on where to find him, some more details on his combat stats (estimated health, damage on 60 armor, innate health regeneration, I've heard mention hexes have their duration halved on him so which boss characteristics does he have et cetera) and other references in the game (if there are any). If those things are added, I'll support this page to be featured. Also, please keep further discussion on how to improve the page on talk:Dhuum. Sorry guys, you must find me pretty annoying by now, but right now this is just an article about an NPC like any other, with some minor lore information added. — Why 15:39, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Tactics? See the quest to kill him. We do not have a walkthrough on Mallyx, or Abaddon, Shiro, Kanaxai, or other major bosses which are dealt with in a mission or quest exclusively. Nor do they link to the quest/mission's page. Most of those stats are not common place or anything, heck, they are on only like 5% of the NPC pages. Having them acceptable to be featured doesn't mean 100% complete - past pages, such as Lore, Charr, and the like were not done to their fullest either. What your asking for is something which will take weeks - perhaps month - for a full dedicated team of people constantly doing the UW and not doing it to win it, but to study it. The only people I know who'd do that is the lore community, but they are not interested in game mechanics in the common sense. What you're wanting is something that won't occur for any article - ever. Unless you get Joe or some other anet employee who can find/know these things. I'm sorry, but that's just illogical. :/ -- Konig/talk 16:20, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

It's not that hard. Have him hit a caster and document the damage. Cast a high-damage spell on him, record the damage it did, see how many pixels you blew off his health bar. I said estimate, not exact values. Could do it in a single run. Same goes for testing which boss characteristics he has, and making a map.
Also, the walkthrough on that quest page is very limited. I'd love to see a couple of skill suggestions, either on the Dhuum page or a link on the Dhuum page reading something like "for suggestions on how to defeat Dhuum, see <link>." Also, Dhuum lacks a Quotes section, a thing which many other bosses have.
And yea, it's true that these data are missing on many other NPC pages like the ones you mentioned. But don't think I wouldn't have said the same about other pages. NPCs have little info to share, but that just means we should try to document as much of it as possible, instead of just saying, "hey, this page has an awesome image, let's feature it!" And of course the pages will never be complete. But let's at least try to flesh it out a bit more. — Why 17:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) I hardly doubt having accurate numbers would be just one run. And I, at least, am not saying this should be featured because of the image (it is true, lot of people are more interested in links, images, and there being something more than lists), I think it should be featured because it is accurate and complete to known lore, its lists are complete, and except for minor things which people hardly focus on (natural regeneration for example) it is pretty much as complete as we can get at the moment. It is really only minor things - some of which doesn't requiring to go and fight him, and those that do, it is a lot of work and people will probably not bother to record it unless they go there specifically to record the information (which is highly unlikely). I still see no reason to not feature this article (and maybe after re-writing some other major boss articles, feature those as well). -- Konig/talk 18:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I have too agree with Why here. A article has too be complete before it can be featured and I dont think we can accept a page just because it might be better by the time we feature it. I hope evryone agrees with me on this point. I really have no problem with this page but it has too be full and I dont think a page is ready too be featured if it is only a week or 2 old.--Wysth 18:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

yes, the page isn't very stable right now, but i'm going to try and push it to be alot better. maybe an administrator could monitor stuff and make sure the picture doen't change every hour and stuff. anyways, i'm going to work on this article because it needs cleaning up anyways. also i improved my signature. ------> -- Jrhsk8 talk 23:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

omg this might be a while, just checked the page, and it says, direct quotse here, "Rv is a noob." wtf is that supposed to mean? i better get to work. Jrhsk8 talk 23:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

EDIT: the page says now, "Rv is a noob. Chucks is awesome though, so it's all good." LOL Jrhsk8 talk 23:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Just minor vandalism. Welcome to the wiki. ;) — Why 00:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Just a little question do we keep the page in this section or is it better to move it and add it too this section later again we the page is as good as it will be?--Wysth 19:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

There's no consensus, let's keep it here. Besides, while this project isn't meant to discuss how to improve the pages we're talking about, it's what usually happens anyway, so meh, removing it would only cause discussion to be fragmented. — Why 00:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

"Just minor vandalism. Welcome to the wiki." what would be major? anyways, i think it is a little bit more stable now but we probably have to wait. Jrhsk8 talk 23:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Major vandalism would be late night (for us americans as that is the least activity of the wikis) full page/big edit vandalisms. I still don't think the page can get any better due to the requirements to get to Dhuum (those that go just to "study" Dhuum will have plenty of issues with the quests, I'm sure). Hmmm, perhaps getting the stats Why wants is something the Test Krewe can do for the community. Would make things plenty easier. -- Konig/talk 17:35, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Accepted pages

[edit] Dwayna Vs Grenth

Accepted to be featured during Wintersday 2009

Nice article, informative, and has a nice map. --syn // talk 23:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

I say yes, but during Wintersday. Pointless to feature if we cannot enter the map, imo. -- Azazel the Assassin/talk

hey, nice... an article i've made significant contribs to. i of course vote for featuring it, and agree w/ azazel on displaying it only during wintersday events. i was actually considering nominating the dragon arena article to be featured during the dragon festival, but didn't think of it in time. if others agree, this article could be featured during wintersday in july. --VVong|BA 01:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually, yes, I like. I'm sure we can make an exception for this. I wouldn't have agreed when it was just some article related to Wintersday, but it is actually well-written, complete and informative too! — Why 01:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to have to say just for Wintersday, even though I very much like the article. Visitors who don't know what this is, don't know what Wintersday is, or are just plain confused will get even MORE confused - even though the article explains this very well, I'd rather they see this when it's available. Plus, featuring it during or just before Wintersday would be a help to them! Unless we have a shortage of good articles to feature, I can't say I'd put this up when the feature is unavailable. MiraLantis 07:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

anyone else wanna comment? wintersday in july is this weekend, so it'd be nice if this got a firm thumbs up for a feature by tomorrow. --VVong|BA 14:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, it's a yes from me of course. --syn // talk 15:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

This and next week's featured article is up, so this wouldn't go up for Wintersday in July anyways. :P I'm still up for holding this back til the actual Wintersday. Or just before.-- Azazel the Assassin/talk 18:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

why don't we just jump this article ahead of the others for this weekend only? --VVong|BA 19:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) If people think it's a good idea to have this featured in the lead up to wintersday in July there is no reason not to. The two week period for featured pages was decided to give the project structure instead of just randomly changing it when people feel like it. The occasional exception for special events would be fine. Personally I think it would be great to feature the page during Wintersday in July, the after the event the current feature can be returned and given an extra week or something so that it's been up for a full two weeks. Garrett 01:43, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

so we have a few ppl in favor of featuring this article this weekend. how about featuring it starting friday morning? any nay's to this idea? --VVong|BA 19:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

i've gone ahead and moved the article to accepted b/c there weren't any objections. maybe someone could look at preparing the main page for featuring this article tomorrow? --VVong|BA 19:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm assuming this will be on hold until... next Wintersday? lol--syn // talk 22:09, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Let's put it on hold until the first real Wintersday, this was just a weekend event. :) — Why 22:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

well, i went so far as to change the copy/edit page for this, but no one w/ edit privileges put it on the front page. so yeah, whatever. --VVong|BA 22:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Rejected pages

Also see this archive.

[edit] Featured pages

Also see this archive.

[edit] Guide to character creation

Accepted 11:59, 03 November 2009 (UTC), Featured 08:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

this page seems to be well written the only problem i see is a lack of images and the Statistical trivia section needs to be updated.-- Zesbeer 23:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Well its a nice page, of course we would need to sort that update tag in Statistical Trivia. Tidas 06:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree on it beeing a nice page but it is really a basic page I dont think people that have played the game longer then a week will be intressed.--Wysth 16:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

It's good for beginners, but not for those who have played a while. -- riyen ♥ 17:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

To stay faire it is a good article i say featuring it but only if we don't have other pages left.--Wysth 18:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

I have nothing on it. It is basic, but it is helpful for those who are browsing out of interest in thinking about getting the game. And, since Factions and Nightfall as well, it has changed (mainly PvP and additional campaigns), so if there are any old players returning from pre-release of either of those, would be semi-helpful. So, I agree on featuring (besides, it's good written and will give us 2 weeks to find more pages!) -- Konig/talk 18:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Ok I agree on the last statement, I will move it to the accepted part on 1 november 19:00:00 (UTC)--Wysth 17:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm gonna see if I can fix the outdated info. I'd prefer to have it straightened out before we push it to the main page. — Why 15:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Done. If you wanna check my numbers, go ahead. I might have miscalculated something somewhere but I think I did it right. — Why 17:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

No I believe you. Good thamks for checking up again. I dont have enough game-experience (and time atm) too check al these tables before we send it too the mainpage. I mostly check it on spelling and red links. And if the aricle is well written.--Wysth 18:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)