Talk:Flare

From Guild Wars Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] DPS Data

Full data gathered while Testing Damage per second(DPS)
2,016 Over 62 seconds.
average dps of 32.
Best damage in a single second of 56 at 1 second
Death occurred at 18 seconds
Data collected using the standards written Here.
~ Zero rogue x 08:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm confused. If the spell's damage is 56 at 12 fire magic, and all standard projectile spells like this one have a .75 second Aftercast delay, isn't it just assumed that the base DPS of this skill is (56/1.75) = 32? I'm okay with your numbers, I'm just wondering if it's worth bothering to list the DPS for every skill? (especially one so simple to calculate without a training dummy as this one is...) --Mystisteel 20:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Im doing all elementalist skills, This is just one of the first. ~ Zero rogue x 21:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Right, but for what reason? As I've said in your analysis of MoR, it's quite pointless. Skills are either very easy to calculate, such as this one, or it's completely impossible to list all the right conditions for a spell to be of use (MoR, in which you listed how much damage it does against a single target). I'm not asking you what you're doing, I know that. I'm asking you why in the world are you doing it?
Maybe he is just really, really bored.Old Man Of Ascalon 23:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
It's not that hard, just flare spam the master of damage at the isle of the nameless and he gives the stats, rouge did the same thing. Justing6 22:48, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Skill icon

Am i the only one that's seeing a burning flying skull in this pic? —ZerphatalkThe Improver 02:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Let's have a look.

Sorry, I do not see it. - VanguardImage:User-VanguardAvatar.PNG 16:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I see it, somewhat. its more looking downwards from my angle, but I see it. I think its just coincidence there. Image:User-Wandering Traveler Sig.png Wandering Traveler 18:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I talked to someone about this before, it's completely unintentional. One can easily make an accidental illusion if you only have so many pixels to work with. 76.235.135.238 23:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Huh, imagine that. I never noticed the skull in there >_> NeonCrusader 21:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools