User talk:Infinite

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Personal to-do-maybe-probably-not list[edit]

Armor sets to complete and add to HoM for completionist's sake[edit]

Other HoM things for completionist's sake[edit]

None of these will happen any time soon, especially not the PvP parts. Some of the armor sets are best of the worst scenarios. - Infinite - talk 22:34, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Raisu Palace[edit]

While I am in agreement, the last two consensus argued against separating Raisu Palace. Try asking greener, alex, etc. for their opinions. Also read the relevant article discussions for insight. --Falconeye (talk) 22:21, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

I can understand the consensus against separating, as it is only the Proof of Legends that specifically isolate the palace from the rest of Kaineng City. For all intents and purposes, though, on the Proof of Legends page it should remain split. The split is an anomaly and can be listed as such. - Infinite - talk 22:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
One thing to note, I have not been a regular player of GW1 in years. That means I'm no longer aware of some of its idiosyncrasies. I will do my best to ensure that the wiki functions properly, but making judgment calls on what most accurately conveys information to users in these cases is beyond me. G R E E N E R 23:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Also, an extensive search came up blank: where did this discussion take place, exactly? - Infinite - talk 13:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Nvm, found it. - Infinite - talk 13:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Per your flagging of my attention[edit]

I only see User:Classic Kiriyama/Miniatures as properly existing in the User space. Test number 1 and test number 2 (User Space is Name Space 2). Was there something else that was acting strangely? G R E E N E R 23:23, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Just this: [1] - Infinite - talk 23:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
That image is so odd. I can't reproduce it, so my best guess is that there was an error, but the wiki has fixed itself after your edit to the page. The new location shows me nothing inappropriate under Main space, nor does the old location.
Are you still getting it? If so, could you clear your cache and see if it's still there? G R E E N E R 00:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
I agree, hence calling out for someone with admin tools. If it doesn't show up at the new location, I'm sure it's fine now! - Infinite - talk 00:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Oh! You wanted me to use admin tools, sorry! I'll get around to blocking you for breaking the wiki later tonight ; ). G R E E N E R 00:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm only reducing the wiki by thousands of characters at a time. [2] [3] Surely you can justify blocking me by now. :P - Infinite - talk 00:27, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Also, I am going to leave the remainder of the old Zhed file links as they are. The mainspace was fixed, major template uses were altered, the redirect can be removed whenever (like Shiro's once was). - Infinite - talk 10:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Topic split[edit]

While your new overview looks very nice, I have to admit that I preferred the old tables. Was easier to use when looking for stuff for me. But since I don't paly GW any more :( there's no point in arguing. :D Cheers, Steve1 (talk) 09:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
The main vice with the tables was both its design (it was not exactly... aesthetically pleasing) as well as its display on windowed/smaller resolutions (scrolling horizontally for life, amirite). For use now, simply click the zone you need in the ToC and in one quick glance all available skills in that zone are listed. Not a single link got removed, just the format for them.
I really wanted to work with div anchors and such, but I fear this wiki is very unfamiliar with such parameters. Also, I wouldn't have knocked off so many characters in the process! - Infinite - talk 10:13, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

And here I'd thought...[edit]

...you'd disappeared for good. What brings you back? I miss the wikiknight to my wikidragon. Aqua (talk) 22:58, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Haha, I never left GWW. Only GW2W. I'm still active on Guild Wars, after all! But the lesser desirable sequel, yeah, that one's dead to me. :] - Infinite - talk 11:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Fun facts[edit]

Now that was a neat little fun fact. G R E E N E R 20:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! It was definitely a stumble-upon moment. - Infinite - talk 21:15, 3 September 2017 (UTC)