Template talk:Gw2w

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search


I definitely prefer this to the other one. There are few improvements to be made but I am not messing with that code. The main icon needs to be more spaced from the text in my opinion, and also I think it would be nice if it was aligned in the middle vertically too. Also you could use the interwiki links instead of a URL with plainlinks code. --LemmingUser Lemming64 sigicon.png 22:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Location Location Location[edit]

Shouldn't this tag appear on the articles that use it at the top of the articles, and not as an afterthought? I have asked this on the pages I notice too, but there are too many of them to get them all. 20:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

I think it's often used as a kind of trivia note (which are at the bottom of pages) as it has a similar level of relevance. The most important info is the GW1 stuff, and then GW2 is a follow-on "if you're interested in more, see this" kind of thing. pling User Pling sig.png 20:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
It may be, but I still think it is something important enough to be higher on the page. 21:34, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
The {{gw2w}} must go at the Trivia section, just like historical notes that have no current presence ingame. User Yoshida Keiji Signature.jpg Yoshida Keiji (talk) 17:56, 27 October 2012 (PDT)

Usage cleanup[edit]

I've just removed about 95 pages with unrelated gw2w pages - sharing the title alone isn't really noteworthy. Also historical gw2 skills aren't really worth noting :/ A good example of a related skill would be Blinding Flash and Blinding Flash --Chieftain Alex 15:15, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps a template similar to gw2:Template:Guild Wars skill (e.g. Template:gw2 page) be created and placed in the Trivia sections of articles that share the same name as a GW2 article, such as some skills that share the same name but function differently. --Silver Edge 22:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


I removed the "also" as a default. There are quite a few articles on gw2w which don't share the exact name and thus we'd need 3= as an option which is bothersome. Even if the articles on both wikis are the same, the missing also isn't a problem. Steve1 (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)