Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Poke
Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions. |
Poke[edit]
This request is for the sysophood reconfirmation of Poke (talk • contribs • logs • block log), based on user request.
Created by poke | talk 20:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Status[edit]
Successful. 02:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Candidate statement[edit]
Hey,
a lot people didn't really take this reconfirmation serious, and I have to admit that the special circumstances this reconfirmation was triggered cannot really be taken too serious. However, given that it in the end it doesn't really matter how a reconfirmation starts, all what counts is, that it starts. And as such, I'll take this quite serious.
Most people probably know me. I'm a registered user here since 8th February 2007 (one day short after the wiki started) and actually active since March/April that year. I started with cleanup duties and other background things until I became a sysop on 9th August 2007. Since then I have done a lot different things, especially in the area of wiki coding, which lead to me being the first person to get asked when having problems with anything code related. To mention just some projects (just in case you don't know); I am the author of GuildWarsWikiTools (which next version I really hope to get released as soon as possible), I wrote two MediaWiki extensions and multiple other JavaScript enhancements, contributed a lot to the template namespace and also took a core position in the development of quite a lot of pages across the wiki (links are just random examples).
As a sysop, I personally would categorize myself into the background-technical-janitorial-yet-open-for-anything category. In general I try to remain as neutral as possible in all actions, especially in user disputes, which I actually try avoid if possible. And I also plan to continue it like this, as this is the way I feel most comfortable.
If you have any more questions, feel free to ask me on the talk page. Thanks. poke | talk 20:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Support[edit]
- Support. We can't miss you as a sysop. -- Cyan 20:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support. Need I say more? — Jon Lupen 20:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support. hurr durr support --Frosty 20:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Support C4K3 Talk 20:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Über Support Poke is one of the reasons this wiki even exists :) - J.P.Talk 20:48, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support. I'm not even going to give a reason for this bullshit. - Mini Me talk 20:53, 28 February 2010
- Support. Cause opposing is just stupid. King Neoterikos 20:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support. --Kyoshi (Talk) 20:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong support. Losing poke as a sysop would be detrimental to the wiki. Poke is one of the users that can use the benefit of the additional tools effectively. He's already showed what he's done to help the wiki (those 2 MW extension I believe were created specifically for this wiki), and as far I see there's no reason he should lose his Sysop abilities. ~ PheNaxKian 21:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support One of the few great sysops here. --Shadowphoenix 21:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Manifold 21:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- -Auron 21:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Support See above --SilentStorm 21:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support I see no reason whatsoever to not keep poke as a sysop.--Pyron Sy 21:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- --Dominator Matrix 21:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- ♥ –Jette 21:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Lania Elderfire 21:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support What I said the first time still applies; there is no reason to oppose. — Indochine talk 21:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support lol joke reconfirmation Cress Arvein 21:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Nick123 21:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- –alistic 22:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- – Emmett 22:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support, Support and Support. --Rainith 22:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- — Why 22:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Without doubt one of the (if not the) most valuable sysops of the wiki. --Xeeron 22:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Salome 23:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- FreedomBound 23:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support — PmaN 23:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- --Silverleaf Don't assume, Know! 00:13, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- -- Aspectacle 00:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- I like Poke, but isn't he from whatever *action* elix Omni 00:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- /reconfirmation RIDDLE 00:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- -- Kaisha 00:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support This RfA is so stupid and a waste of time. Dont make me regret my vote. Drogo Boffin 02:01, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support What Drogo said...--Fighterdoken 02:11, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Oppose[edit]
- Oppose Loves to Sync 21:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. Fanboi voters, the lot of ye. Vili 点 02:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- ...
Neutral[edit]
- ...
Request for reconfirmation[edit]
- ...