User talk:The Emmisary

Welcome

Thought I'd stop by and say welcome to the wiki! Head over to here if you need some basic editing assistance. I'm new myself, but if you need help feel free to ask on my talk page and I should be able to point you in the right direction. Have fun editing! Shadow Runner 16:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

suggestion feedback

Hey, I moved your suggestion homepage to Feedback:User/The Emmisary as that's your correct username; please use that from now on. Thanks. -- Brains12 \ talk 20:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Law and Order

Please stop reverting that change, it takes a little bit for the wiki and its cache to process the new picture, leave it alone for a day and if it still hasnt changed, then ask someone who knows. Sonic Thursday 00:13, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

You might also try clearing your browser cache (ctrl+F5) since I see the same image as you uploaded in all of the thumbnails. -- Wyn talk 00:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

LMFAO my bad The Emmisary 02:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

The original image by Delgado is better than the one you uploaded. Clearer, antialiased, shows the pommel, bigger. You should revert it to the Original. --Darksun 16:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

I dont care revert it if you want to i just put mine up cause i was bored and some dude wanted a diff picThe Emmisary 00:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Small mistake ;)

I think you made a mistake... Demonical Monk 17:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

So i was wiking and saw..

You just broke 1RR.--Neil2250 18:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

So ban me. The similarity is there but there are too many things that can look like the icon to add it to trivia. The Emmisary 18:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

I was actually going to revert it, but Emmisary beat me. Discuss it on the talk page. Shadow Runner 18:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

?

"I agree! Although according to lore, the player in the capacity that we know them technically doesn't exist, I think. And yes, tons of stuff has changed..."

"@ Jette and Alice, first off all I'm not at all surprised that you two would be complaining since that's all you guys do on this wiki."

If you want me to stop "complaining all the time", then it's a bad idea to give me shit when I'm not actually complaining. If you weren't such an asshole you might have been able to harness a bit of reasoning power and understand that my comment wasn't a complaint at all, and neither was Jette's. That section's conversation was about as tame as they come. Oh but I guess it's expecting to much to assume the average guildwikipedian would hold another's opinion as anything other than a complaint.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20! 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Look at all of those complaints, clearly it's all that I do on this wiki. The only accurate statement is that I "complain" more often than not. Even so you are still an asshole for bringing it up completely out of the blue. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә ѕνәи Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 22:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the wall of text? The Emmisary 22:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Clearly you are capable of reading english as you seem to have a more than adequate grasp of it. If you don't want to take responsibility for your bullshit then just say so Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә ѕνәи Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 22:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Clearly we have a different opinion on the meaning of "complaining". For example, what you are doing now is "complaining" to me. However, I will answer your comment if it means it will calm you down. Th reason I typed that is because I considered Jette's comment a rant against Anet, which he/she did not refute, and you typed some thing like "I agree". I assumed you were agreeing with Jette and in turn agreeing with another complaint. Perhaps you were addressing another user and if you were I thoroughly apologize. I do not mean to diminish your contributions, but I tend to see more of your wiki work in discussions where you criticize Anet. Also you can stop adding crap to my talk page or else I might have to actually learn how to archive. The Emmisary 22:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

You interrupted a perfectly fine conversation. Jette's comment was a neutral observation of the state of the player character in the game. I agreed with the observation and gave a reason why it might be. This is called discussion. I'm sorry your definition of "complaint" is so strange and before learning to archive, you might want to learn how to keep your mouth shout in cases like this where stating your thoughtless opinions of people isn't warranted. And I'll leave it to you to figure out who's fault is it to begin with for this section of your talk page. I brought it here because I didn't want to cause a mess on the article's discussion page. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә ѕνәи Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 22:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

That's nice and all but to be honest I truly don't care. I've explained my side and I'm not going to fight any further. I'm sorry you feel this way, hopefully we don't have this useless conversation again. The Emmisary 22:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Not caring is not an excuse for idiocy. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә ѕνәи Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 23:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

You confuse backing away from an unnecessary argument with idiocy. The Emmisary 23:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you should stop starting shit with people? Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә ѕνәи Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 00:05, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you should grow up and put this behind you. The Emmisary 00:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Never. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә ѕνәи Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 04:04, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

15 second

It really does say "second". Would you mind adding taking the "s" back out and the [sic] back in? Manifold 02:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh my total bad dude. I just looked at Guild War's site and thought "wtf is manifold doing he usually gets his shit right". Ill fix it.

Wastrel's Worry

"What gave you the fantastic impression that if they have PnH that they just wont remove the hex instead?"

While the foe is under the effects of P&H (3 seconds, maybe 5 with blessed aura), P&H should be recharging on the caster (12 seconds) and cannot be used to remove WW. I'm well aware that this is a rare situation, I listed it just for completeness sake to have all hex reducers on that page. Your edit is still false btw, since there are foes using NR that are neither bosses nor boss-like. I'd appreciate if you could either fix it or simply revert to my last edit. Thanks. Tub 19:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

I was trying to keep it short and simple but apparently people like to have every tiny useless detail, even in the most impossible situations.I will not be reverting myself, you can revert it whenever if you feel like. I'll probably start discussion if you do. First of all, I'm glad you realize finding a PnH is a rare situation but not only that one would then have to do the guesswork to assume who it was on. Furthermore, I'm well aware that other foes have the resistance too but they are not all known. It is more beneficial to state the what we DO know that has it.As much as I'm all for details, only ones that are practical should be added.--The Emmisary 19:43, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Emerald Blade

I am sure it would get reverted again since it is only a single IP removing the comment and multiple users putting it back, but I will respect your motives, considering I no longer play the game and that it is not that important to go back and grind for it. — Gares 21:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

I agree entirely, the I.P was no doubt took an overzealous stance in the matter even if he was right. Thank you for the support I will debate for it in a more civil manner, I assure you.--The Emmisary 21:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Apologize if I was curt. I was trying to finish my post in a hurry to get out of the office. I'll try to convey the rest of my thoughts now. Yeah, there are a few things to factor in when confronted with an issue like this, which I assume everyone that reverted the IP did. These are a) How long has the information been in the article uncontested, b) who is doing the reverting c) who is doing the re-reverting. In this particular case, the information had been in the article for a few days. The IP has no previous contributions nor offered any information involving the revert. The re-reverters are of course, knowledgeable enough based on their contributions. While I have never seen it myself, I have not seen a lot of items drop that others have posted, so I inclined to agree with the majority and protect the information already found on the page. — Gares 21:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

I would have jumped in if I had noticed it earlier. There is no source to trace back to in this case and although I usually assume good faith, it is not to the extent in which I let very questionable information slide by.--The Emmisary 22:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Blue pill spam

To be fair, the question was related to the article itself, and was not a question inherent to the way the wiki works, even if the answer was. No need to move it.--Fighterdoken 01:19, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

I beg to differ, it was not about the article at all. The question was aimed toward this template and as such it was also asked in the wrong area. Furthermore the user was inquiring about why he was seeing the random links and you in your response even stated that it was due to a server delay and that is more of a wiki question than anything else.--The Emmisary 01:26, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

It might be wise...

to not respond to him anymore. He's going to get banned if he doesn't calm down and he's obviously upset about more than just Auron's admin tools. If no one replies, then he'll have nothing to rage at. Karate Jesus 02:41, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Ive already decided not to respond but thank you for the advice. :D --The Emmisary 02:48, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I realized it was a bit late after I hit "save page" and then saw your addition to the AN. Sorry 'bout that :/ Karate Jesus 02:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Best to treat vandals like children. They tire out eventually, then need their nap. Admin will take care of it. G R E E N E R 01:31, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Dood

Don't discuss on the admin noticeboard if you're not an admin. It makes things cluttered and confusing. elix Omni 23:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Dude I'm a secret admin.--The Emmisary 23:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm a secret Anet dev. Also, my cat is secretly a pokemon. Not one of those pansy-ass pokemon like Meowth, but a legendary "bend over and prepare for rape" type of pokemon. Karate Jesus 01:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

That's nothing, I own Anet and my dog can transform into an autobot.--The Emmisary 01:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Beast Wars sucked. elix Omni 01:37, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I liked it ... to an extent. Whats with the weird font? I knew about autobots before the movie took a dump on everyone's brains.--The Emmisary 01:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

A certain inept user doesn't know how to close his signature tag. elix Omni 01:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Oh well I'll live.--The Emmisary 02:03, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I saved you; you owe me. — Raine Valen 2:09, 24 Sep 2010 (UTC)

Dang I was getting used to it too.--The Emmisary 02:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I think I fixed it, so....shuzz you. Karate Jesus 02:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Did you block me again? — Raine Valen 2:37, 24 Sep 2010 (UTC)

On MSN? Nooooo....I didn't even do it the first time. Karate Jesus 02:42, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Really? Cuz you're clearly online and your box is very convincingly white. — Raine Valen 2:44, 24 Sep 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I'm doing some research for a journal article, so I'm not on MSN. I'll be on a lot tomorrow, darling. Karate Jesus 02:54, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Was a revert really necessary? --168.122.167.221 15:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Kinda was seeing how your a vandal and all.--The Emmisary 15:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

KJ Thinks you RV'd it b/c you're in love with Raine and that you're jealous that she asked me to have jedi sex dreams about her =\ --168.122.167.221 15:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I think its pretty hard to fall in love with someone you've never met or plan to meet, anyway you are welcome to have all the dreams you want about her, just don't comment about it on a wiki where it doesn't matter or is appropriate.--The Emmisary 15:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Personal attacks

[1] [2] [3]

Even against vandals, trolls, or sockpuppets, please don't. If you want them to go away, ignore them and just let the sysops deal out their blocks. -- pling 15:42, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Kysten Shore/Center Shrine

Not making some troll argument. I just made that addition to the costume brawl page cause i felt i played with so many noobs

i dont know why u felt the need to write 'u mad?'

Anyways. On kysten shore, u got 3 shrines. BC(battle cry), C(center), and E(energy). It seemed like you follow along the 'bandwagon' idea that teams should rush to the middle and fight at C shrine at the very start. If you play it that way, it leaves that battle at 50% win/lose. So I don't understand why you don't just cap BC first. Let the enemy capture center(but they are stupid cause they don't see what's coming). Then your team groups up for attack on center shrine. Your team has the advantage because you have the BC buff. Essentially, you should win if both teams are even(meaning all players are of equal skill level-hypothetically speaking). Now you have taken control of center shrine. You currently control BC and C. All you gotta do is pick the enemy off as they spawn. Hopefully they don't all group up. You attack people going for BC and C. And you win.

So...what is your reasoning to why the above is such a bad idea? EVERYONE goes to center at the start and fights. Why not give your team an advantage before you fight? I never said 'don't go for center'. I just said go for center AFTER you take BC. So please respond, I'm confused as to why no one does this. This is a signature? Not sure what it does. 11:21, 26 October 2010 (UTC)