Guild Wars Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Issue archive 1
From Guild Wars Wiki
Shadowsin - NPA issue
Shadowsin (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
we got off topic. badly. lets go back to the possible NPA breach at my My Talk Page. If I'm too impulsive at bringing this up again, just tell me to shut up (admins, not users). --
Wandering Traveler 13:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's not a possible breach, It IS a breach of the NPA. -- Salome
17:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Warned by Brains12. As far as I'm concerned (other sysops are free to disagree, of course), the issue is resolved. On a sidenote (and this isn't directed solely or even mainly at you, Wandering Traveler), I'm sorely tempted to ban the next non-admin who posts to the noticeboard with anything other than a report for the sysops. I'm starting to think it's the only way rein in the debates and arguments and general backseat sysopping, and keep this page useful. - Tanetris 19:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Brother Cadfael, Sockpuppet
Brother Cadfael (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Sockpuppet of Mgrinsphon, going around block. — ク Eloc 貢 09:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence of the sock puppetry please? I found nothing conclusive in the contribs. --Lemming
17:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Apart from logging in on IRC with that name and talking about it, there's no evidence that I know of. - anja
20:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- User_talk:Mgrinshpon#Brother_Cadfael? --
Brains12 \ Talk 20:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- And the bit where he got his personas confused. (-3 points for unskilled sockpuppetry, gris.) Backsword 09:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- User_talk:Mgrinshpon#Brother_Cadfael? --
- Apart from logging in on IRC with that name and talking about it, there's no evidence that I know of. - anja
(Reset indent) Moved back as problem wasn't resolved. — ク Eloc 貢 20:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Just fyi, the reason I made Brother Cadfael was to try my hand at a new, minimalist userpage design. Colonel Grinchineer 20:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Blocked. |y --
Brains12 \ Talk 21:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
y r u so fgt? — Skakid 02:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Liche / Lussh
Liche (talk • contribs • logs • block log) and Lussh (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
[1] — ク Eloc 貢 20:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Shadowphoenix - Meditation
Shadowphoenix (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Can someone please block me for 30mins to an hour, b4 I blow up! --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 21:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- As said on Galil's talk page, we - or at least I - won't ban on user request. In this case, it's your problem. And please don't abuse the Admin noticeboard for your problems, thanks. poke | talk 21:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
User:Mgrinshpon sockpuppets
Grincherina (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Mgrinshpon --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 23:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- blocked by Tanetris. --Lemming 00:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Grinch Wars Wiki (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Just guess.... --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 02:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Toxic Chill (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Mgrinsphon --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 15:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Plague Signet (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Mgrinsphon --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 15:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've blocked the above two according to the block log of User:Disrupt shot!. By the way, make sure you spell the names correctly when reporting. -- Brains12 \ Talk 16:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- :P sorry i cant spell today --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 16:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Skakid9090 - NPA
Skakid9090 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
here --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 13:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- leve poor skakid alon --Disrupt Shot! 14:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
66.33.252.108 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
This is Skakid circumventing his prior block btw. --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 14:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Lemming65 - Admin Impersonation
Lemming65 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Trying to impersonate Lemming64 --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 22:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Impersonating an admin isn't a blockable offence. And it wasn't really impersonating me anyway. So just ignore and it will go away. --Lemming 22:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Actively impersonating an admin is something that I would consider blockable and encourage sysops to deal with in a timely manner. However, the specific case in question does not seem to be actively attempting to cause problems, thus I don't think this requires intervention (at this time).
(Aiiane - talk - contribs) 22:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Actively impersonating an admin is something that I would consider blockable and encourage sysops to deal with in a timely manner. However, the specific case in question does not seem to be actively attempting to cause problems, thus I don't think this requires intervention (at this time).
J.Kougar - NPA
Constant personal attacks on Gaile Gray, on her talk page; has been warned by an admin but continues. --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 03:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think they're fully NPA, but more of a nature designed to elicit responses such as yours. To stop feeding trolls, even a "please stop feeding the troll" will only feed the troll. Gaile has archived her talk again so we'll see. -- ab.er.rant
03:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, they wern't really NPA voilations, so trying to throw a ban at me for it is rather undeserved and pointless, right? :) ~
J.Kougar
- NPA on ShadowPhoenix's Page here, he needs a ban. 68.151.27.108 04:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- They did ban me silly. ;) It's just never worked on me unless I concent to it, and since they didn't explain the ban or length or anything to me this time, I'm going to ignore it for now. :) ~ J.Kougar
- They did ban me silly. ;) It's just never worked on me unless I concent to it, and since they didn't explain the ban or length or anything to me this time, I'm going to ignore it for now. :) ~
- NPA on ShadowPhoenix's Page here, he needs a ban. 68.151.27.108 04:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, they wern't really NPA voilations, so trying to throw a ban at me for it is rather undeserved and pointless, right? :) ~
- 208.101.35.52 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
J.Kougar circumventing block --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 08:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- 66.197.241.54 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
J. Kougar circumventing block --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 00:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked. — Galil
00:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- 72.36.245.194 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Proxy. — ク Eloc 貢 03:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Wow ShadowPhoenix... you are obsessed with me aren't you? This is getting creepy, and I think my fiance is getting jealous.
Anyway... the above 208. proxy is one I used for a few minutes to make a couple needed posts, but the older posts by that same IP are clearly not mine. That aside, if you list every IP I use here, this page will end up needing to be archived very very soon. It's just not worth it, I won't run out... and so long as Aiiane is refusing to address the issues and explain why she can break the NPA rules in the exact same ways that I did, and be allowed to do it when I am not... I'll have to keep adding to the discussions. I'm sorry to put you through all the hassle, but I have to do what I have to do in order to try and resolve some small bit of the rampant injustice on this wiki. ~ 
J.Kougar
Arbcom case
An arbitration case involving Kougar has been filed. I would ask a sysop to unban Kougar to enable him to post on that talk page (and reban him if he edits anywhere else during the remaining period of his ban). --Xeeron 12:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Kougar is unblocked. - anja 12:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
122.104.160.66 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Horrible offensive joke about genocide in this edit, but Guild Wars Wiki:No personal attacks only covers racist comments directed at a specific person, what should we do? -- Gordon Ecker 06:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- While the editor comes on rather strong, I don't see a problem with the edit. He's not suggesting or promoting genocide, just using it as hyperbole. If you'd like, ask him to tone it down, but I don't consider it an admin matter (other sysops are free to disagree, as always). - Tanetris 07:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's probably a joke, but it's still offensive he or she said "If my country decided to kill all the <adjective> people because they didn't like them I'd understand", I don't think we should go easy on him or her becaus <adjective> happens to be "white". Also, I checked APNIC to determine whether it was a fixed or variable IP. I'm not sure, the ISP has both broadband and dialup, however, according to APNIC, the IP is from an Australian ISP, so apparently we have someone who is not in Taiwan implying that they are an angry Taiwanese player and trying to offend everyone, that sounds like a troll setting up a strawman. -- Gordon Ecker 10:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- Anyway, I'm calling it a night. -- Gordon Ecker 12:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think you may be misinterpreting what the IP is saying. I read it as "If my country decided to (etc etc) I'd understand ArenaNet cutting ties with their servers because of that", not that he/she would understand genocide. - Tanetris 16:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- Anyway, I'm calling it a night. -- Gordon Ecker 12:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's probably a joke, but it's still offensive he or she said "If my country decided to kill all the <adjective> people because they didn't like them I'd understand", I don't think we should go easy on him or her becaus <adjective> happens to be "white". Also, I checked APNIC to determine whether it was a fixed or variable IP. I'm not sure, the ISP has both broadband and dialup, however, according to APNIC, the IP is from an Australian ISP, so apparently we have someone who is not in Taiwan implying that they are an angry Taiwanese player and trying to offend everyone, that sounds like a troll setting up a strawman. -- Gordon Ecker 10:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Tanetris. While inappropriate, I don't see it as a sysop matter. A notice to the user to tone down the comments would be fine. It is not our job to determine if this user is a legitimate Taiwanese player or not, it has nothing to do with the comment at hand either, in my opinion. - anja 12:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- You're right, "then I'd understand" seems like racist hyperbole at first glance, but it could also be read as "then I'd understand ArenaNet cutting off the servers". Because the statement is ambiguous and the poster may not be a native English speaker, I think we should give him or her the benefit of the doubt. -- Gordon Ecker 00:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
User:Regina Buenaobra
Requesting semi-protection for page, since proxy-anons will just keep going for a while, looks like. Now that admins are online is not a problem, but people has to sleep also i think :).--Fighterdoken 23:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- We're on the save wavelength, was just going to do that. -- Brains12 \ Talk 23:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
User:Auzzie - NPA
NPA violation on Regina's talk page User_talk:Regina_Buenaobra#Go_home_plz... (might I add it's far more rude than anything J.Kougar ever said to Gaile) ;) ~ 
Sabastian 23:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Striter of darkness - RC Spam
- Striter of darkness (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Has been asked kindly by several users and admins to use the minor edit and show preview buttons when making small changes to his/her guildpage; but continues not to. Also has been asked by many users and admins to upload images under the right names, but continues not to. Also, has been recreating a page call "Lost" even after admins and users alike have asked him/her to place it in the guild namespace. I am afraid that this user is doing this just to troll. --Shadowphoenix 
04:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's not trolling. He's trying to make his guild page as perfecto as possible, but probably doesn't realise the way he's going about it is not the best. He probably doesn't read his talk page, and if he does, he's not reading it. I for one would be put off from reading it when it's full of notices and ..warnings?.. on the page if I was a new user. That picture of the Show Preview is not appropriate, and if anything, will detract him from looking at it at all.
- I don't think a block is necessary on grounds of "trolling". If another admin feels it's appropriate to block for ignoring notices, go ahead. -- Brains12 \ Talk 14:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- This is not something to "warn" and block users for. One or two friendly notices are enough. - anja 14:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- He has already gotten 2 friendly notices and a nice picture to go with it. Antiarchangel
NO U 22:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- He's removing the guild page cleanup tag, even though his guild page has far too many images, in addition to clogging up RCs, despite being warned several times over the past few days. Kokuou 00:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- He has already gotten 2 friendly notices and a nice picture to go with it. Antiarchangel
Blocked for ignoring notices (including violations of 1RR, IMAGE and GUILD). -- Brains12 \ Talk 01:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Has removed the guild cleanup tag again without actually cleaning up the page. Kokuou 18:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
evating ban
76.174.39.75 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Guess who...Dominator Matrix 00:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Probably best to continue this on Brains talk page, since he may not be knowingly/purposely doing it. --Kakarot
00:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Request For Temp. Protection
Vandals --Shadowphoenix 23:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Cursed Angel
Cursed Angel (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
1 ~ SCobra
10:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- QQ --Frozen Archer 10:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see why this comment should require admin intervention? - anja 15:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see why this comment should require admin intervention? - anja
67.142.130.23
67.142.130.23 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
....seems to like to violate 1RR and more Dominator Matrix 22:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ill take it as no Admin Intervention needed Dominator Matrix 00:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- A block would be rather arbitrary now he has stopped, let us know if he does it again. --Lemming 12:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- A block would be rather arbitrary now he has stopped, let us know if he does it again. --Lemming
Template:Guild infobox
Could we get this page protected from editing? Looking at the history, a lot of it is just reverts from people testing things or trying to change things to their own personal liking without discussion. — ク Eloc 貢 06:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Just revert. Add in a html comment to explain things if you think it'll help people understand it better. -- ab.er.rant 01:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Miniature - Protection
Requesting protection until the 28th to protect spoilers, plus the amount of unneeded edits that 3rd year is causing. Dominator Matrix 00:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'd be willing to protect to the level of autoconfirmed until the 28th. If another sysop disagrees, feel free to revert as always. -- Brains12 \ Talk 00:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Already temp protected Brains, hopefully done right as it's my first. --Kakarot 00:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Already temp protected Brains, hopefully done right as it's my first. --Kakarot
Injunctions
- Guild Wars Wiki:Arbitration committee/2008-04-06-User:J.Kougar#Related injunctions
- Sysops, please read the injunction I issued in relation to an arbitration case. Like anything else you do as a sysop, if you disagree with the enforcement of this injunction, you are not required to enforce it yourself. Please let me know if anything is unclear. —Tanaric 05:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've changed the link to point dircetly to the injunction. -- Gordon Ecker 06:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Request for temp.protect
For Polar Bear, Black Bear, Brutal Mauling, since it seems that our guest is one of those proxy-friendly users, and requests to stop the revert war went to the trash-bin quickly.--Fighterdoken 23:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Protected from unregistered edits for 1 week. -- Gordon Ecker 00:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Animal companion too. Who takes so much time to intend to be useless? --Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 01:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Someone who enjoys entertaining the Cabal to no end? Calor
01:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Protected from unregistered edits for the same duration. -- Gordon Ecker 04:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Someone who enjoys entertaining the Cabal to no end? Calor
- Animal companion too. Who takes so much time to intend to be useless? --Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 01:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
User:Mgrinshpon - Sexual Stories (Revisted)
- Mgrinshpon (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
User:Mgrinshpon/Breaking News yet again, can this be handled by the admins or do I need to start an ArbComm? --Shadowphoenix 00:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- ← moved to User talk:Shadowphoenix
- It's arguably a violation of the content restrictions of the user pages policy. -- Gordon Ecker 01:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- True, but most assuredly, it could be handled by admins. A request to remove it would probably be appropriate, followed by more serious consequences if he fails to comply. Lord Belar 01:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- It's arguably a violation of the content restrictions of the user pages policy. -- Gordon Ecker 01:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I return a free man - Sockpuppet
- I return a free man (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Likely a sockpuppet, recreated Grinsh's "Breaking News" page --Shadowphoenix 21:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oh nvm Tanetris got him --Shadowphoenix
21:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Request for temp. semi-protection of the Community Portal
Persistant vandal, etc. --Shadowphoenix 01:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Protected for 3 days. -- Gordon Ecker 20:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Alliance battle and 1RR
Someone might want to deal with the revert war current taking place on Alliance battle. 
*Defiant Elements* +talk 17:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Has been informed of the reversion policy, seems to have stopped. -- Gordon Ecker 20:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Repeated copyright violations
User:Skakid9090. Persistent uploading of non-GFDL content: Image:User_Skakid9090_Piplup.jpg and Image:User_Anti_PvX.jpg (at least the second time this one has been uploaded). He doesn’t seem to care about the fact that non-GFDL content is not permitted. -- 
Indochine talk 17:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- I said on my talk page I didn't know, and it was the first time I've uploaded either. — Skakid 16:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Protection for..
Game updates (again). Dominator Matrix 03:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Protected from unregistered edits for 1 day, along with game updates/20080512. -- Gordon Ecker 03:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
80.193.1.106
- 80.193.1.106 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Mostly trolling at User talk:NoXiFy. May get out of hand at this rate.--Fighterdoken 23:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- oya i do it for ska <3 80.193.1.106 00:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
yes. plz help with this. this kid is really immature and my userpage looks like crap now. :( --'ÑöẊĭƑý
00:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- lol so does your attempt at /epeen at winning halls, who gives a shit about crappy HA 80.193.1.106 00:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
User:Skakid9090
- Skakid9090 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Continually changing trolling and adding pictures of piplup and other strange stuff to mess pages up. He also has a short temper and uses proxys to vandalize others user pages (mine is being vandalized right now.) --'ÑöẊĭƑý 00:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Could you provide links to where Skakid is doing this? - anja 07:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
i've posted them several times, someone keeps reverting this page -_- --Noxify
- It's being moved ot the talk page. -- Gordon Ecker 03:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
User:Napalm Flame
- Napalm Flame (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
- General trolling. Keeps attacking Noxify and possibly breaking NPA on various talk pages. -- Salome 22:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked by brains --Shadowphoenix 22:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the edit conflict. --
Brains12 22:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the edit conflict. --
- Blocked by brains --Shadowphoenix
User:Raph fails
- Raph fails (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Unless Raph loves to troll himself, I'd suspect this is not him. --
Wandering Traveler 13:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- This user is already blocked. - anja 13:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- My cache clearing fails at life then...sorry about that. --
Wandering Traveler 13:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- My cache clearing fails at life then...sorry about that. --
User:Lawl i r not using proxy to make this
Made for purposes of trolling, vandalism and disruption. banme ;) Lawl i r not using proxy to make this 14:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Done! - anja 14:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Request for semi temp. protection
User talk:Gaile Gray/Guild Wars suggestions
User talk:Gaile Gray/Guild Wars 2 suggestions
Seem to be attracting allot of vandalism from IPs --Shadowphoenix 19:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- GW1 protected, GW2 is not as much of a target (yet) so it's untouched for now. - anja 19:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- FYI, notices probably aren't needed when vandals are being blocked and pages protected within seconds. -- Brains12 19:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think I changed all the comments back to their original state or at least the ones by the original vandal but it looks like you lot have got the others. --Kakarot 19:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think I changed all the comments back to their original state or at least the ones by the original vandal but it looks like you lot have got the others. --Kakarot
- FYI, notices probably aren't needed when vandals are being blocked and pages protected within seconds. --
Ban the French from PvP
User_talk:Gaile_Gray/Guild_Wars_suggestions#Ban_the_French_from_PvP
Since someone added a deletion tag to it, i wanted to move the issue here since it just appears to be creating drama and NPA breaches. The tag was for promoting racism i think, but not sure if the topic in question requires admin attention or if it should just be left to Gaile's discretion as always.--Fighterdoken 23:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Please know that I'm not starting or adding on to a discussion here. I would like to request a ban for all the users violating the NPA on that discussion. In my humble opinion the violations on that page have gotten out of hand and need dealing with. LunarEffect 12:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
It was me who suggested that a section from that page should be deleted - the section which suggested that French players be banned from PVP. The user Owut there has now suggested that I be 'banned from life' and I don't appreciate death threats. The follow on thread on 'separating' French players, (No more international alliance battles) as a form of GW apartheid, should also be removed, as it too is getting a lot of bad language and personal insults posted by Owut, his aliases, and supporters. I believe these posters are only trying to divide GW players on racist grounds, and are not making useful contributions to the game or wiki. I think admin action is required.--Vana Runedottir 00:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- There have not been any responses since Poke's; the "action" has been taken for now. -- Brains12 \ talk 00:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- May want to keep an eye into the topic poke's suggested instead, since NPAs seem to continue there now.--Fighterdoken 01:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Tanetris has banned Owut for his NPA offenses. Give it a few days, this might have calmed down already. --Xeeron 11:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- While the other admins' warnings are commendable, I do not tolerate such blatant disregard for our no personal attacks policy. I hope it will calm down as Xeeron stated, but I will personally watch for any infraction be it major or minor that breech this policy from here on out regarding these two discussions and ban the violator sans additional warnings. — Gares 17:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Tanetris has banned Owut for his NPA offenses. Give it a few days, this might have calmed down already. --Xeeron 11:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- May want to keep an eye into the topic poke's suggested instead, since NPAs seem to continue there now.--Fighterdoken 01:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
76.64.185.213
- 76.64.185.213 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Keeps violating GWW:1RR. Plus the reverts are because of his strategy. Dominator Matrix 03:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Stop using these "Wikirules" to keep something that isn't worth keeping, and is even potentially harmful to newbies. 76.64.185.213 03:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- 76.64.185.213, you are not allowed to remove this from this page. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 04:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Seems to have resolved itself on anons talk page. --Kakarot 04:21, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any indication it's resolved. I've asked him politely to stop, but I've not seen any indication whether or not the anon will comply. We'll have to wait and see. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 04:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- The original dispute was regarding removal of text from the skill pages, and based on the end of the first section on the anons talk page and his addition to the Epidemic talk page that was what I was referring to. However the actual skill page should really of been reverted to it's original state before the anon first removed the text while discussion happened on the talk page. Also I started writing that just after the comments were added but kept getting a lot of edit conflicts each time I went to save. I have reworded my comment below.
- The original dispute seems to have resolved itself on anons talk page, IP still needs to be watched. --Kakarot 04:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- blocked. The last action was still removing this from the noticeboard. poke | talk 11:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Also seen at User:90.7.212.39 Dominator Matrix 22:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- blocked. The last action was still removing this from the noticeboard. poke | talk 11:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any indication it's resolved. I've asked him politely to stop, but I've not seen any indication whether or not the anon will comply. We'll have to wait and see.
- Seems to have resolved itself on anons talk page. --Kakarot
- 76.64.185.213, you are not allowed to remove this from this page.
69.248.232.88
- 69.248.232.88 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Breaching GWW:1RR. Erasculio 00:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- blocked for circumventing ban (it was Skakid), 1RR and NPA (see section below). poke | talk 10:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Skakid9090
Want proof that more vandalism was started? here and here. I think arb case is needed. Dominator Matrix 05:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see how this is related to Skakid, except he's mentioned on the page. I have no idea what you want me to do either, is there vandalism? Trolling? - anja 06:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Both. Usual. We don't now what happens in skakids life...but it apears to be fanboys of him. Dominator Matrix 06:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it's either.. 1. They know each other by friends.. or guild. or 2. He hates that person, so he tries to get us to think he started it. Halogod35
06:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it's either.. 1. They know each other by friends.. or guild. or 2. He hates that person, so he tries to get us to think he started it. Halogod35
- Both. Usual. We don't now what happens in skakids life...but it apears to be fanboys of him. Dominator Matrix 06:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- I've been framed. It's pretty fucking obvious that I've been framed too, since he posted that everywhere. Try to be less of a dumb shit when making accusations about someone. Let the admins handle shit like this, because you're obviously not intelligent enough to comprehend common sense. Sorry for being a dick, but you deserve it. 69.248.232.88 06:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Also, does that even mildly resemble the kind of trolling I commit? I'm appalled you'd think I'd be that uncreative and blunt =( 69.248.232.88 06:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Like what he said. :p Halogod35 06:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Like what he said. :p Halogod35
- Also, does that even mildly resemble the kind of trolling I commit? I'm appalled you'd think I'd be that uncreative and blunt =( 69.248.232.88 06:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
The IP is blocked, vandalism is reverted. I think that's enough. - anja 
06:33, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
User:Tab
Tab (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
NPA on Regina' talk page, telling her to "f**k off" ,most of his violations are on her page. What is to be done?--
Raph Talky 13:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Please provide direct links.. I don't want to look through the history for a comment that was probably reverted. poke | talk 13:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Tab was blocked a while ago. Can you provide links to what he has done since then, since I can't find anything? - anja 13:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- The "fuck you" statement was done in jest in response to a jokelike comment from Regina - look at the bottom section. Read the context it's in. Regina seems to be able to handle these "trolling" cases in her own way; seeing as it's her talk page, that's the main issue.
- Regardless, User:Tab was blocked some time later and is currently blocked. -- Brains12 \ talk 14:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
fair enough....ill get the links...one moment--Raph Talky 17:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- that took forever...anywho...i belive this is what you're looking for--
Raph Talky 17:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
look at the previous post...the link is a little bass-ackwards--Raph Talky 17:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Gares has blocked Tab for two weeks already. - anja 17:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
figured that out a couple hours ago...thnx for the reminder tho--Raph Talky 18:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
User:Droks
Droks (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
- Minor personal attacks on several pages. I did warn him, but he's still continuing. ~ Wandering Traveler 19:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- ← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard#Droks
Napalm Flame - Trolling
- Napalm Flame (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
General trolling, minor disturbance --Shadowphoenix 02:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked, continued to troll after being warned twice. --Kakarot 03:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Protection Request
Should we semi-protect things like