Guild Wars Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Issue archive 1

Shadowsin - NPA issue

Shadowsin (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

we got off topic. badly. lets go back to the possible NPA breach at my My Talk Page. If I'm too impulsive at bringing this up again, just tell me to shut up (admins, not users). -- Wandering Traveler 13:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

It's not a possible breach, It IS a breach of the NPA. -- Salome 17:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Warned by Brains12. As far as I'm concerned (other sysops are free to disagree, of course), the issue is resolved. On a sidenote (and this isn't directed solely or even mainly at you, Wandering Traveler), I'm sorely tempted to ban the next non-admin who posts to the noticeboard with anything other than a report for the sysops. I'm starting to think it's the only way rein in the debates and arguments and general backseat sysopping, and keep this page useful. - Tanetris 19:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Brother Cadfael, Sockpuppet

Brother Cadfael (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Sockpuppet of Mgrinsphon, going around block. — ク Eloc 貢 09:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Evidence of the sock puppetry please? I found nothing conclusive in the contribs. --Lemming 17:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Apart from logging in on IRC with that name and talking about it, there's no evidence that I know of. - anja 20:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

User_talk:Mgrinshpon#Brother_Cadfael? -- Brains12 \ Talk 20:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Well asides from IRC, the fact that Brother Cadfael was pretty inactive and only started contributing right after Mgrinshpon was blocked. Also, the link Brains posted. — ク Eloc 貢 01:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

And the bit where he got his personas confused. (-3 points for unskilled sockpuppetry, gris.) Backsword 09:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Moved back as problem wasn't resolved. — ク Eloc 貢 20:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Just fyi, the reason I made Brother Cadfael was to try my hand at a new, minimalist userpage design. Colonel Grinchineer 20:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

It was a neat looking userpage, I'll give you that. — ク Eloc 貢 20:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. |y -- Brains12 \ Talk 21:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

y r u so fgt? — Skakid 02:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Liche / Lussh

Liche (talk • contribs • logs • block log) and Lussh (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

[1] — ク Eloc 貢 20:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard#Liche / Lussh

Resolved. -- ab.er.rant 03:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Shadowphoenix - Meditation

Shadowphoenix (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Can someone please block me for 30mins to an hour, b4 I blow up! --Shadowphoenix 21:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

As said on Galil's talk page, we - or at least I - won't ban on user request. In this case, it's your problem. And please don't abuse the Admin noticeboard for your problems, thanks. poke | talk 21:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Mgrinshpon sockpuppets

Grincherina‎ (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Mgrinshpon --Shadowphoenix 23:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

blocked by Tanetris. --Lemming 00:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Grinch Wars Wiki (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Just guess.... --Shadowphoenix 02:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- ab.er.rant 02:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Toxic Chill (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Mgrinsphon --Shadowphoenix 15:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Plague Signet (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Mgrinsphon --Shadowphoenix 15:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I've blocked the above two according to the block log of User:Disrupt shot!. By the way, make sure you spell the names correctly when reporting. -- Brains12 \ Talk 16:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

:P sorry i cant spell today --Shadowphoenix 16:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Unblocked the last two, it wasn't grinsh. poke | talk 21:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Skakid9090 - NPA

Skakid9090 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

here --Shadowphoenix 13:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

leve poor skakid alon --Disrupt Shot! 14:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

66.33.252.108 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
This is Skakid circumventing his prior block btw. --Shadowphoenix 14:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

blocked by Tanetris poke | talk 15:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Lemming65 - Admin Impersonation

Lemming65 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Trying to impersonate Lemming64 --Shadowphoenix 22:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Impersonating an admin isn't a blockable offence. And it wasn't really impersonating me anyway. So just ignore and it will go away. --Lemming 22:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Actively impersonating an admin is something that I would consider blockable and encourage sysops to deal with in a timely manner. However, the specific case in question does not seem to be actively attempting to cause problems, thus I don't think this requires intervention (at this time). (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 22:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

i agree -- (Aiane - talk - contribs) 22:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

That said, a spree of such accounts would constitute "actively trying to cause problems".... *cough*. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 22:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Did Aiiane just agree with herself? *confused* -- Salome 18:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Strike that, just worked it out. I'm a numpty. -- Salome 18:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Ohai there Mr. another impersonator! (guh, more admin impersonations....)--Raph Talky 21:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

J.Kougar - NPA

• J.Kougar (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Constant personal attacks on Gaile Gray, on her talk page; has been warned by an admin but continues. --Shadowphoenix 03:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't think they're fully NPA, but more of a nature designed to elicit responses such as yours. To stop feeding trolls, even a "please stop feeding the troll" will only feed the troll. Gaile has archived her talk again so we'll see. -- ab.er.rant 03:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree, they wern't really NPA voilations, so trying to throw a ban at me for it is rather undeserved and pointless, right?  :) ~ J.Kougar

NPA on ShadowPhoenix's Page here, he needs a ban. 68.151.27.108 04:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

They did ban me silly.  ;) It's just never worked on me unless I concent to it, and since they didn't explain the ban or length or anything to me this time, I'm going to ignore it for now.  :) ~ J.Kougar

• 208.101.35.52 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

J.Kougar circumventing block --Shadowphoenix 08:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Blocked by Tanetris. -- Brains12 \ Talk 14:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• 66.197.241.54 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

J. Kougar circumventing block --Shadowphoenix 00:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. — Galil 00:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• 72.36.245.194 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Proxy. — ク Eloc 貢 03:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow ShadowPhoenix... you are obsessed with me aren't you? This is getting creepy, and I think my fiance is getting jealous.

Anyway... the above 208. proxy is one I used for a few minutes to make a couple needed posts, but the older posts by that same IP are clearly not mine. That aside, if you list every IP I use here, this page will end up needing to be archived very very soon. It's just not worth it, I won't run out... and so long as Aiiane is refusing to address the issues and explain why she can break the NPA rules in the exact same ways that I did, and be allowed to do it when I am not... I'll have to keep adding to the discussions. I'm sorry to put you through all the hassle, but I have to do what I have to do in order to try and resolve some small bit of the rampant injustice on this wiki. ~ J.Kougar

Arbcom case

An arbitration case involving Kougar has been filed. I would ask a sysop to unban Kougar to enable him to post on that talk page (and reban him if he edits anywhere else during the remaining period of his ban). --Xeeron 12:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Kougar is unblocked. - anja 12:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

122.104.160.66 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Horrible offensive joke about genocide in this edit, but Guild Wars Wiki:No personal attacks only covers racist comments directed at a specific person, what should we do? -- Gordon Ecker 06:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

While the editor comes on rather strong, I don't see a problem with the edit. He's not suggesting or promoting genocide, just using it as hyperbole. If you'd like, ask him to tone it down, but I don't consider it an admin matter (other sysops are free to disagree, as always). - Tanetris 07:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

It's probably a joke, but it's still offensive he or she said "If my country decided to kill all the <adjective> people because they didn't like them I'd understand", I don't think we should go easy on him or her becaus <adjective> happens to be "white". Also, I checked APNIC to determine whether it was a fixed or variable IP. I'm not sure, the ISP has both broadband and dialup, however, according to APNIC, the IP is from an Australian ISP, so apparently we have someone who is not in Taiwan implying that they are an angry Taiwanese player and trying to offend everyone, that sounds like a troll setting up a strawman. -- Gordon Ecker 10:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Anyway, I'm calling it a night. -- Gordon Ecker 12:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I think you may be misinterpreting what the IP is saying. I read it as "If my country decided to (etc etc) I'd understand ArenaNet cutting ties with their servers because of that", not that he/she would understand genocide. - Tanetris 16:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Tanetris. While inappropriate, I don't see it as a sysop matter. A notice to the user to tone down the comments would be fine. It is not our job to determine if this user is a legitimate Taiwanese player or not, it has nothing to do with the comment at hand either, in my opinion. - anja 12:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

You're right, "then I'd understand" seems like racist hyperbole at first glance, but it could also be read as "then I'd understand ArenaNet cutting off the servers". Because the statement is ambiguous and the poster may not be a native English speaker, I think we should give him or her the benefit of the doubt. -- Gordon Ecker 00:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Regina Buenaobra‎

Requesting semi-protection for page, since proxy-anons will just keep going for a while, looks like. Now that admins are online is not a problem, but people has to sleep also i think :).--Fighterdoken 23:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

We're on the save wavelength, was just going to do that. -- Brains12 \ Talk 23:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Auzzie - NPA

NPA violation on Regina's talk page User_talk:Regina_Buenaobra#Go_home_plz... (might I add it's far more rude than anything J.Kougar ever said to Gaile) ;) ~ Sabastian 23:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Given a notice/warning by Fighterdoken. -- Brains12 \ Talk 00:19, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Striter of darkness - RC Spam

Striter of darkness (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Has been asked kindly by several users and admins to use the minor edit and show preview buttons when making small changes to his/her guildpage; but continues not to. Also has been asked by many users and admins to upload images under the right names, but continues not to. Also, has been recreating a page call "Lost" even after admins and users alike have asked him/her to place it in the guild namespace. I am afraid that this user is doing this just to troll. --Shadowphoenix 04:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

It's not trolling. He's trying to make his guild page as perfecto as possible, but probably doesn't realise the way he's going about it is not the best. He probably doesn't read his talk page, and if he does, he's not reading it. I for one would be put off from reading it when it's full of notices and ..warnings?.. on the page if I was a new user. That picture of the Show Preview is not appropriate, and if anything, will detract him from looking at it at all.

I don't think a block is necessary on grounds of "trolling". If another admin feels it's appropriate to block for ignoring notices, go ahead. -- Brains12 \ Talk 14:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This is not something to "warn" and block users for. One or two friendly notices are enough. - anja 14:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

He has already gotten 2 friendly notices and a nice picture to go with it. Antiarchangel NO U 22:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

He's removing the guild page cleanup tag, even though his guild page has far too many images, in addition to clogging up RCs, despite being warned several times over the past few days. Kokuou 00:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The issue seems to have spilled over into my talk page, so discuss there instead of on the noticeboard please. -- Brains12 \ Talk 00:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for ignoring notices (including violations of 1RR, IMAGE and GUILD). -- Brains12 \ Talk 01:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Has removed the guild cleanup tag again without actually cleaning up the page. Kokuou 18:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

evating ban

76.174.39.75 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Guess who...Dominator Matrix 00:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Probably best to continue this on Brains talk page, since he may not be knowingly/purposely doing it. --Kakarot 00:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Blocked -- Brains12 \ Talk 01:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Request For Temp. Protection

Game updates/20080410

Vandals --Shadowphoenix 23:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Protected. -- Brains12 \ Talk 23:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Cursed Angel

Cursed Angel (talk • contribs • logs • block log) 1 ~ SCobra 10:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

QQ --Frozen Archer 10:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't see why this comment should require admin intervention? - anja 15:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

67.142.130.23

67.142.130.23 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

....seems to like to violate 1RR and more Dominator Matrix 22:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Ill take it as no Admin Intervention needed Dominator Matrix 00:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

A block would be rather arbitrary now he has stopped, let us know if he does it again. --Lemming 12:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Template:Guild infobox

Could we get this page protected from editing? Looking at the history, a lot of it is just reverts from people testing things or trying to change things to their own personal liking without discussion. — ク Eloc 貢 06:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Just revert. Add in a html comment to explain things if you think it'll help people understand it better. -- ab.er.rant 01:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard#Guild infobox

Miniature - Protection

Requesting protection until the 28th to protect spoilers, plus the amount of unneeded edits that 3rd year is causing. Dominator Matrix 00:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

I'd be willing to protect to the level of autoconfirmed until the 28th. If another sysop disagrees, feel free to revert as always. -- Brains12 \ Talk 00:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Already temp protected Brains, hopefully done right as it's my first. --Kakarot 00:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Kakarot. It was fine, but I slightly modified the dates to match the release as announced on the website. That's my first time using the expiry feature (was implemented with the recent software update), but it should be right. -- Brains12 \ Talk 00:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Injunctions

Guild Wars Wiki:Arbitration committee/2008-04-06-User:J.Kougar#Related injunctions

Sysops, please read the injunction I issued in relation to an arbitration case. Like anything else you do as a sysop, if you disagree with the enforcement of this injunction, you are not required to enforce it yourself. Please let me know if anything is unclear. —Tanaric 05:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I've changed the link to point dircetly to the injunction. -- Gordon Ecker 06:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Please note the statement ending that arbitration. --Xeeron 22:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Request for temp.protect

For Polar Bear, Black Bear, Brutal Mauling, since it seems that our guest is one of those proxy-friendly users, and requests to stop the revert war went to the trash-bin quickly.--Fighterdoken 23:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Protected from unregistered edits for 1 week. -- Gordon Ecker 00:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Animal companion too. Who takes so much time to intend to be useless? --Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 01:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Someone who enjoys entertaining the Cabal to no end? Calor 01:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Protected from unregistered edits for the same duration. -- Gordon Ecker 04:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Mgrinshpon - Sexual Stories (Revisted)

Mgrinshpon (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

User:Mgrinshpon/Breaking News yet again, can this be handled by the admins or do I need to start an ArbComm? --Shadowphoenix 00:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

← moved to User talk:Shadowphoenix

It's arguably a violation of the content restrictions of the user pages policy. -- Gordon Ecker 01:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

True, but most assuredly, it could be handled by admins. A request to remove it would probably be appropriate, followed by more serious consequences if he fails to comply. Lord Belar 01:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

So he is doing this intentionally against the rules for a second time? Since he clearly knows that he's breaking the rules, but still does it, a ban is the only option really. -- (gem / talk) 01:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This issue has been taken to ArbComm --Kakarot 03:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I return a free man - Sockpuppet

I return a free man (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Likely a sockpuppet, recreated Grinsh's "Breaking News" page --Shadowphoenix 21:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh nvm Tanetris got him --Shadowphoenix 21:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Request for temp. semi-protection of the Community Portal

Persistant vandal, etc. --Shadowphoenix 01:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Protected for 3 days. -- Gordon Ecker 20:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Alliance battle and 1RR

Someone might want to deal with the revert war current taking place on Alliance battle. *Defiant Elements* +talk 17:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Has been informed of the reversion policy, seems to have stopped. -- Gordon Ecker 20:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Repeated copyright violations

User:Skakid9090. Persistent uploading of non-GFDL content: Image:User_Skakid9090_Piplup.jpg and Image:User_Anti_PvX.jpg (at least the second time this one has been uploaded). He doesn’t seem to care about the fact that non-GFDL content is not permitted. -- Indochine talk 17:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I said on my talk page I didn't know, and it was the first time I've uploaded either. — Skakid 16:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Protection for..

Game updates (again). Dominator Matrix 03:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Protected from unregistered edits for 1 day, along with game updates/20080512. -- Gordon Ecker 03:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

80.193.1.106

80.193.1.106 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Mostly trolling at User talk:NoXiFy. May get out of hand at this rate.--Fighterdoken 23:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

oya i do it for ska <3 80.193.1.106 00:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

yes. plz help with this. this kid is really immature and my userpage looks like crap now. :( --'ÑöẊĭƑý 00:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

lol so does your attempt at /epeen at winning halls, who gives a shit about crappy HA 80.193.1.106 00:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Skakid9090

Skakid9090 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Continually changing trolling and adding pictures of piplup and other strange stuff to mess pages up. He also has a short temper and uses proxys to vandalize others user pages (mine is being vandalized right now.) --'ÑöẊĭƑý 00:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Could you provide links to where Skakid is doing this? - anja 07:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

i've posted them several times, someone keeps reverting this page -_- --Noxify

It's being moved ot the talk page. -- Gordon Ecker 03:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard#User:Skakid9090

User:Napalm Flame

Napalm Flame (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

General trolling. Keeps attacking Noxify and possibly breaking NPA on various talk pages. -- Salome 22:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Blocked by brains --Shadowphoenix 22:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit conflict. -- Brains12 22:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Raph fails

Raph fails (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Unless Raph loves to troll himself, I'd suspect this is not him. -- Wandering Traveler 13:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

This user is already blocked. - anja 13:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

My cache clearing fails at life then...sorry about that. -- Wandering Traveler 13:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

wow...i shouldve seen tgat coming..--Raph Talky 21:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

oya ofc you should, don't flame kewl anons or shit happens. Owut 21:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

"Don't discuss here" -- Brains12 21:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Lawl i r not using proxy to make this

Lawl i r not using proxy to make this (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Made for purposes of trolling, vandalism and disruption. banme ;) Lawl i r not using proxy to make this 14:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Done! - anja 14:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Request for semi temp. protection

User talk:Gaile Gray/Guild Wars suggestions
User talk:Gaile Gray/Guild Wars 2 suggestions
Seem to be attracting allot of vandalism from IPs --Shadowphoenix 19:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

GW1 protected, GW2 is not as much of a target (yet) so it's untouched for now. - anja 19:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

FYI, notices probably aren't needed when vandals are being blocked and pages protected within seconds. -- Brains12 19:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

I think I changed all the comments back to their original state or at least the ones by the original vandal but it looks like you lot have got the others. --Kakarot 19:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Ban the French from PvP

User_talk:Gaile_Gray/Guild_Wars_suggestions#Ban_the_French_from_PvP

Since someone added a deletion tag to it, i wanted to move the issue here since it just appears to be creating drama and NPA breaches. The tag was for promoting racism i think, but not sure if the topic in question requires admin attention or if it should just be left to Gaile's discretion as always.--Fighterdoken 23:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Please know that I'm not starting or adding on to a discussion here. I would like to request a ban for all the users violating the NPA on that discussion. In my humble opinion the violations on that page have gotten out of hand and need dealing with. LunarEffect 12:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. I put a warning on that page, please tell me, if there are any problems afterwards. poke | talk 13:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

It was me who suggested that a section from that page should be deleted - the section which suggested that French players be banned from PVP. The user Owut there has now suggested that I be 'banned from life' and I don't appreciate death threats. The follow on thread on 'separating' French players, (No more international alliance battles) as a form of GW apartheid, should also be removed, as it too is getting a lot of bad language and personal insults posted by Owut, his aliases, and supporters. I believe these posters are only trying to divide GW players on racist grounds, and are not making useful contributions to the game or wiki. I think admin action is required.--Vana Runedottir 00:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

There have not been any responses since Poke's; the "action" has been taken for now. -- Brains12 \ talk 00:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

May want to keep an eye into the topic poke's suggested instead, since NPAs seem to continue there now.--Fighterdoken 01:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Tanetris has banned Owut for his NPA offenses. Give it a few days, this might have calmed down already. --Xeeron 11:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

While the other admins' warnings are commendable, I do not tolerate such blatant disregard for our no personal attacks policy. I hope it will calm down as Xeeron stated, but I will personally watch for any infraction be it major or minor that breech this policy from here on out regarding these two discussions and ban the violator sans additional warnings. — Gares 17:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

76.64.185.213

76.64.185.213 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Keeps violating GWW:1RR. Plus the reverts are because of his strategy. Dominator Matrix 03:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop using these "Wikirules" to keep something that isn't worth keeping, and is even potentially harmful to newbies. 76.64.185.213 03:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

76.64.185.213, you are not allowed to remove this from this page. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 04:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Seems to have resolved itself on anons talk page. --Kakarot 04:21, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any indication it's resolved. I've asked him politely to stop, but I've not seen any indication whether or not the anon will comply. We'll have to wait and see. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 04:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The original dispute was regarding removal of text from the skill pages, and based on the end of the first section on the anons talk page and his addition to the Epidemic talk page that was what I was referring to. However the actual skill page should really of been reverted to it's original state before the anon first removed the text while discussion happened on the talk page. Also I started writing that just after the comments were added but kept getting a lot of edit conflicts each time I went to save. I have reworded my comment below.

The original dispute seems to have resolved itself on anons talk page, IP still needs to be watched. --Kakarot 04:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

blocked. The last action was still removing this from the noticeboard. poke | talk 11:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Also seen at User:90.7.212.39 Dominator Matrix 22:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

69.248.232.88

69.248.232.88 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Breaching GWW:1RR. Erasculio 00:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

blocked for circumventing ban (it was Skakid), 1RR and NPA (see section below). poke | talk 10:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Skakid9090

Want proof that more vandalism was started? here and here. I think arb case is needed. Dominator Matrix 05:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't see how this is related to Skakid, except he's mentioned on the page. I have no idea what you want me to do either, is there vandalism? Trolling? - anja 06:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Both. Usual. We don't now what happens in skakids life...but it apears to be fanboys of him. Dominator Matrix 06:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, it's either.. 1. They know each other by friends.. or guild. or 2. He hates that person, so he tries to get us to think he started it. Halogod35 06:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I've been framed. It's pretty fucking obvious that I've been framed too, since he posted that everywhere. Try to be less of a dumb shit when making accusations about someone. Let the admins handle shit like this, because you're obviously not intelligent enough to comprehend common sense. Sorry for being a dick, but you deserve it. 69.248.232.88 06:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Also, does that even mildly resemble the kind of trolling I commit? I'm appalled you'd think I'd be that uncreative and blunt =( 69.248.232.88 06:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Like what he said. :p Halogod35 06:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

The IP is blocked, vandalism is reverted. I think that's enough. - anja 06:33, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Tab

Tab (talk • contribs • logs • block log) NPA on Regina' talk page, telling her to "f**k off" ,most of his violations are on her page. What is to be done?--Raph Talky 13:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Please provide direct links.. I don't want to look through the history for a comment that was probably reverted. poke | talk 13:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Tab was blocked a while ago. Can you provide links to what he has done since then, since I can't find anything? - anja 13:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The "fuck you" statement was done in jest in response to a jokelike comment from Regina - look at the bottom section. Read the context it's in. Regina seems to be able to handle these "trolling" cases in her own way; seeing as it's her talk page, that's the main issue.

Regardless, User:Tab was blocked some time later and is currently blocked. -- Brains12 \ talk 14:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

fair enough....ill get the links...one moment--Raph Talky 17:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

that took forever...anywho...i belive this is what you're looking for--Raph Talky 17:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

look at the previous post...the link is a little bass-ackwards--Raph Talky 17:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Gares has blocked Tab for two weeks already. - anja 17:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

figured that out a couple hours ago...thnx for the reminder tho--Raph Talky 18:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Droks

Droks (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Minor personal attacks on several pages. I did warn him, but he's still continuing. ~ Wandering Traveler 19:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

But there all baed tbh Droks 19:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't mean the rules don't apply to you, as you continued after being warned you have been blocked. --Kakarot 19:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard#Droks

Napalm Flame - Trolling

Napalm Flame (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

General trolling, minor disturbance --Shadowphoenix 02:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Blocked, continued to troll after being warned twice. --Kakarot 03:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Protection Request

Should we semi-protect things like the noticeboard and a few key talk pages? ~ Wandering Traveler 19:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

No. Easier solution, imo. Delete User:Droks for a day or so, then restore it when this is all said and done. Substituting a bunch of redlinks accomplishes nothing and is easily reverted. Calor 19:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Best of both worlds. -- Brains12 \ talk 19:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Oni

Oni (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Posting hostile comments again, this time against Izzy. Kokuou 21:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Blocked; annoyance + Ursan = FLAME WARZ -- Brains12 \ talk 21:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

GWW:FORMATING/Article names

Guild_Wars_Wiki:Formatting/Article_names

It appears that the article was not restored when fixing the vandalism from earlier. That, or i am blind.--Fighterdoken 01:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

And the corresponding talk page. Calor 02:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Sigh... Take a look at Guild Wars Wiki:Formatting/Article name. I tried moving it to Guild Wars Wiki:Formatting/Article names, but it won't let me. Calor 02:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. - Tanetris 02:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok... it seems we have another problem. Guild Wars Wiki:Elections was moved to "SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM". However, Guild was then later moved to the same location. Things were moved and things deleted. Somehow, the history of Guild and Guild Wars Wiki:Elections have merged into Guild Wars Wiki:Elections... Meh. -- Brains12 \ talk 10:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Since the guild article seems to have dissapeared, can we recreate it with the last known good version in the history? ~ Wandering Traveler 13:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

The page history needs to be restored, it can't be copied and pasted. Something that might work - delete Elections and then manually restore the correct edits for Guild, move them to the right location, then restore Elections. Although I'd like to hear from someone else just incase I break things :/ -- Brains12 \ talk 13:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I noticed a problem yesterday when I was clearing out double redirects but hadn't realized it was this bad. Your suggestion is probably the best way to solve the current problem it just takes time to figure out which revisions belong to which article. But I agree it would be nice to hear from someone else first. --Kakarot 14:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Someone else seems to be working on it at the moment. -- Brains12 \ talk 14:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Good good, hadn't gone to RC yet ... so much red but at least it should be sorted out :) --Kakarot 14:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Should be restored now.. poke | talk 14:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

User:74.61.209.219

74.61.209.219 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

sigh......minor NPA, no block, just a warning--Raph Talky 03:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Non-admins can give out warnings. It's when the warnings are ignored that it becomes noticeboard-worthy. I left a note on his talk about it. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 04:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

ok, i would have done it, but it would have seemed silly for the guy who hes mad a to warn him >_>--Raph Talky 13:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Aidan Protection

Requesting temporary protection of the page due to violations of GWW:1RR with regards to the trivia section. Nbajammer 05:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Protection is not currently warranted. Protecting articles is a fairly extreme measure that we do not undertake for every single violation of 1RR, especially in the case of good faith edits. For now I've posted on User talk:Randy the ranger. - Tanetris 11:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

NPA Mess

Any chance someone might step into the " Why do you favor gimmicks?" section of Izzy's talk page and attempt to shut down what has basically become a mess of NPA violations and people attempting to excuse the NPA violations with poorly though out excuses. There is no excuse for trying to break NPA and attack others. Rakyren 13:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I've given a warning on the page, but take your own advice and don't personally attack others either. -- Brains12 \ talk 14:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard#NPA Mess

Trolling

Theres a lot of offtopic'nis and trolling on reginas page needs to end soon. Dominator Matrix 19:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Cursed Angel

Cursed Angel (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Could you please just get him to stop using the word "Faggot" to describe people. It's getting annoying! -- Salome 22:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Have you tried asking him yourself? -- Brains12 \ talk 22:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

No need to ask a sysop, it's not a crime to tell him yourself. Who knows, maybe he'll respect your wishes. Calor 22:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Such request was already done by another user at User talk:Regina Buenaobra#Cleaning up unused features. The search engine shows no further matches for the word and the username since then.--Fighterdoken 22:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

ban plox --Frozen Archer 22:48, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

This is where it gets to that "discussion" phase; as Fighterdoken says, someone has already requested that he stop. If User:Cursed Angel uses (bad language as) personal attacks in future, then that'll be dealt with then; however, seeing as the request has been made and that we don't censor bad language in itself, this is dealt with for now. -- Brains12 \ talk 22:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Oni#Thanks Fuckface!

A lot of bad blood going around there. It seems the topic's died, but there appears to be high potential for it to continue at a later time. You guys feel free to act how you see fit, be it blocks, warnings, or nothing. If action's already been taken, sorry, missed it. Calor 16:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Blocked both Oni and MikuChan for 3 days for NPA violation. --Xeeron 17:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

undelete Image:Tormented ui v1.jpg

A user requested Image:Tormented ui v1.jpg be undeleted on its talk page. -Smurf 19:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

I messed up a bit, but it should be restored now. - anja 20:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Frozen Archer

Frozen Archer (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

http://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Isaiah_Cartwright&diff=next&oldid=942887 He's been trolling a lot on izzy's any my talk page as well. ~Shard (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Asked to stop by DominatorMatrix and warned by myself, seems to have stopped. -- Gordon Ecker 01:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Not for long. Done25 01:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

I believe Done25 is referring to this. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 04:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Being disruptive again on Regina's talk page (which was moved here). Kokuou 23:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Warned already by Brains.--Fighterdoken 23:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

NPA

NoXiFy (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

NPA here [2]. Dominator Matrix 21:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Nope. Nice try though. TBH, if anyone NPA'd on that page it was you for attacking the user who created that secion. "Until you come up with screenshots, or links...your just trolling. She isn't going to reply to you simply because she doesn't need to." Calling someone a troll and stating "She will never read this because she doesn't need to" is more NPA on me than me NPA on you. I find you calling me a troll extrmely offensive. So stop.--'ÑöẊĭƑý 19:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Getting to a discussion but. You weren't logged in. How would I know that you would come around the corner and NPA me? It was obviously directed to a IP, which usually troll. Seesh Dominator Matrix 00:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Assume good faith Dominator, not all anons are bad. Also Noxify even though Dom's original comment wasn't worded in the best way your response to it was just as bad so you both need to stop and avoid each other for the time being. --Kakarot 00:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Terra Xin

Editing the Guild Wars 2 suggestions, without page creator's permission. Has been told to stop several times, including by Brains. This can been seen here. —Utopian ♫ 23:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

You don't need to have permission to edit a suggestion page. It's not user space or a talk page. Let's all calm down a notch. - anja 23:29, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

hes doing a great job, anet doesnt need essays --Cursed Angel 23:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Anja, she's been cutting down explanatory in-depth articles by over a thousand characters. That would be like me editing the Warrior's page and replacing it with "They are strong, have high armor levels, and use three weapons." I'm sure ANet wants something at least moderatly detailed if they're going to implement it into the game. —Utopian ♫ 23:39, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Then discuss the content, do not go into a shouting match over who owns the article. Because no one does. - anja 23:41, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

I know this isn't the place for discussion, but no one's arguing about ownership. We're discussing wiki etiquette. Kokuou 23:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, this isn't a page for discussion. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page about the matter though. —Utopian ♫ 23:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry for shouting, it's not the right place for such actions. (Terra Xin 05:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC))

Tab

Continues to 'troll' around. Numerous copyright violations, yet he disregards all and still uploads copyrighted pictures. Mostly trolling at Regina's page.--'ÑöẊĭƑý 19:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Already blocked by Kakarot. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 19:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Tab is a piplup, month ban wont do a thing to him. --Super IgorUser:Super Igor 19:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

GW2 Suggestions

Here is the site of a huge revert war between User:Relinquished and User:76.25.197.215. I've posted on both their talk pages to stop and discuss on the talk page, but neither seems to listen. I'm not entirely sure who's in the right/wrong. This may also be of interest, especially the bottom. Calor 03:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

That page also needs protection. Dominator Matrix 04:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Seems to have stopped for now. If it picks up again, action can be taken. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 07:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

I believe the general issue is that users new to wikis are showing up for the new ArenaNet stuff, and bewlieves this to be a web forum. As such, expect more incidents like these. If anyone has an idea how to avoid this, post it on the ArenaNet portal talk. Backsword 07:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Update: possibly not related to this specific case, but about 76.25.197.215 (talk • contribs • logs • block log) -- blocked for personal attacks. -- Brains12 \ talk 13:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Raph's user page

On the top of it, it says "fuck you Morphon" which is obviously a personal attack. Dark Morphon(contribs) 07:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Removed. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 07:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Game updates/20080702

Reccomending a semi-temp for the moment. I've already reverted one vandal, and I suspect more will be coming. -- Wandering Traveler 22:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

All game updates need protection it seems. And it needs urgent protection. Dominator Matrix 23:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

definitely not. poke | talk 23:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

NUCLEARVII

This person trolls my user talk, I have tryed to warn and ask him to stop but it brings no effect whatsoever, need admin help. --Super Igor 15:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

He hasn't actually done much yet, the best way to avoid trolls is to ignore them. I will leave him a polite warning for now. --Lemming 21:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

User:74.61.209.219

74.61.209.219 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

hes trolling now. He also has a minor NPA offense under his belt.--Raph Talky 22:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Raph, you may wish to take your own advice; I'm finding that your comments follow a similar route, perhaps even more so in terms of occurrence. I'm not blocking anyone as of yet, simply turning away and ignoring can be more effective. -- Brains12 \ talk 22:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, now he's vandalizing, so that could factor in. --Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 22:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, just noticed and blocked. Nevertheless, this could have been stopped earlier on by leaving his talk page alone. -- Brains12 \ talk 22:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard

Odd edits User:76.208.248.249

76.208.248.249 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

I'm starting to question his/her edits. Can an admin check if any polices are being broken (or dangerously close). Dominator Matrix 04:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Um, what? Sorry, I'm puzzled as to what you're "questioning". Typically one would have a sense of what they think is being done wrong before they report someone here... the noticeboard isn't a witchhunt. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 07:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The archiving of someone elses page, and combining a archive into one page. Dominator Matrix 07:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Which seems like a good faith bad edit rather than intentional vandalism. -- Gordon Ecker 07:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Before someone slams me for Asume good faith. It was just a question on the persons edits, as I didn't know if they where bad/good. Dominator Matrix 08:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Revert war thats going on

Between me and Skakid on Talk:Suxon. The thing were reverting is that guild name he posted, i censored it because its not exactly the best thing to put on the wiki for people to see, but he says i shouldnt revert other people's comments. This is a valid point. Knowing that weve both broke the 1 rever rule, which one of us is right? Or is it both of us?--Raph Talky 13:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Unless it's a personal attack, comments generally don't need removing. -- Brains12 \ talk 13:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

k, but im pretty sure that isnt something we want people to read on the wiki (i.e im treating this as a "special case")--Raph Talky 14:06, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

It isn't special, since it isn't an attack on anyone. - anja 14:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard

User:Super Igor

Super Igor (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

I didn't want to come here for this, but his continuing, non-constructive trolling is getting annoying and a nuisance. He has also removed a comment of mine, and his response was "Cry More". I realize that I am not entirely blameless on the matter, but he seems to have a vendetta against me. His recent comments on my balance page is not expressing anything sane, which I personally find very disturbing. -- NUKLEAR IIV 16:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

And he has removed my comment again. I'm not going bother to revert back until someone has warned him. -- NUKLEAR IIV 16:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

You were continuosly trolling me just because I didnt like you sf nerf suggestion, why do you expect positive reaction to it? --Super Igor 16:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

both of you have fault in the matter. You're correct, nuclear, that you arent blameless, as you did commit an NPA violation against him. But Igor, you also are removing people's comments, which is also against our rules. Im not an admin, so i cant do anything major, but i suggest you both just avoid each other for a while, or to a more extreme extent, just take a break from the wiki--Raph Talky 16:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

This is directed at everyone. Please note that the Admin Noticeboard works in the following way: A user reports behavior they believe requires administrator intervention. One or more admins respond, taking action if they feel it necessary. And that's it. Anything beyond that quite simply does not belong here, and only makes it harder to use the Noticeboard for its actual purpose. - Tanetris 17:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Super Igor was blocked by Xeeron for violating NPA yesterday and there is also an arbcom request going on atm. poke | talk 17:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

User is evading ban using alternate IP addresses as seen on his talk page. Kokuou 13:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

blocked, please include the link to the suspected user account for these in the future, it saves me having to figure out who it is. --Lemming 14:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Guild:Cold Black Eyes

Can this page be undeleted? I am working on the Alliance's webpages this summer. 13:58, 17 June 2008 Ab.er.rant (Talk | contribs) deleted "Guild:Cold Black Eyes" ‎ (Inactive guild page) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Linda092 (talk • contribs) at 18:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC).

Done - Guild:Cold Black Eyes. -- Brains12 \ talk 18:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow, that was really fast!!! Thank you! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Linda092 (talk • contribs) at 18:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC).

Skakid9090

Skakid9090 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

please keep this user off my talk page and basically out of my way, I am already tired of his blatant and childish trolling back on pvxwiki and dont want him to continue it here. --Super Igor 22:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. --Xeeron 22:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Venomoth

Venomoth (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Trolls, flames and most likely is a sock so checkuser that guy too. --Super Igor 01:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Pot, meet kettle? Stop posting every person who says "QQ" on your page to the noticeboard, when you're bringing most of it upon yourself due to either a) lack of self restraint or b) desire to create drama. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 05:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Only thing that idiot does is trolling look at his contribs. --Super Igor 10:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Simple solution, stop responding in the same way. Also don't post things on the other users talk pages which will obviously just worsen the situation then come running here when they respond in the same way, as Aiiane said you're bringing most of it upon yourself. --Kakarot 11:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Protection needed for...

this page. The gibbers love this page...Dominator Matrix 06:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

It's only 3 times in a 10 minute span, and hasn't continued for days (last gibber was on the 7th?) now. I think it's safe to say it's not an issue. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 06:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Shard#GWW:NPA

It's become a flame-fest. Should this be checked out?--Sum Mesmer Guy contribs 06:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

See section "Venomoth" above; response is general and that section of Shard's userpage was posted before the reply above was made. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 15:52, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

NPA - 72.221.118.12

72.221.118.12 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Continued NPA. Dominator Matrix 07:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

IP edited to remove NPA. Resolved. Dominator Matrix 10:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Terra Xin

Terra Xin (talk • contribs • logs • block log) NPA/trolling here. [3] 68.51.112.211 08:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Where on that section do you find a NPA violation? Please point me to the exact edit. --Xeeron 16:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Checked all of Terra's edits from the last days and found no violation of NPA (just some comments that I agree with tbh.. :P) poke | talk 17:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Napalm Flame

Napalm Flame (talk • contribs • logs • block log) Uploading images that cleary violate userspace policy. (Image:User Napalm Flame Motivator.jpg, and Image:User Napalm Flame Motivator2.jpg), and violation of GWW:1RR. On top of that trolling. Dominator Matrix 15:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

BAWWWWWWWWW. I'm not trolling, I'm defending my right to freedom of expression. Also, explain how it's a violation. Being in a meme is NOT a violation, it's an honor, unless he deems it himself to be a violation. Wait for his take on the situation. Napalm Flame 16:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

J.Kougar doesn't seem to find it offensive, so I don't see much of a reason to delete them. Napalm, please respect the revert rule and don't troll. -- Brains12 \ talk 19:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Understood, brains. Napalm Flame 19:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Wynthyst

Wynthyst (talk • contribs • logs • block log) She's laughing at me on my talk page and on hers! It's not very nice. - FestoonedTwinklepixie 03:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

It's ok we're friends now. - FestoonedTwinklepixie 04:06, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Shai Halud

Shai Halud (talk • contribs • logs • block log) Trying to incite a revert war with me on ArenaNet:Guild_Wars_2_suggestions/Race-Specific_Skills and threatening to revert any other contributions I make he/she disagrees with. --Jette 01:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Warned. -- Gordon Ecker 03:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for 1 day for this edit. Warned Jette as well. --Xeeron 08:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright and deletion issues

Recently, a number of source pages for merges have been tagged for deletion. Im am currently removing the tags as quickly as possible. Please due not delete these pages, and undelete any you find which were deleted until copyright and attribution issues can be sorted out. -- Gordon Ecker 08:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

It'd be better if you attributed in the merged article. A near blank edit, with attribs of the original matterial in the edit summary would solve your issue, without necessitating keeping a lot of obsolete pages. Backsword 08:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I think they should only be kept until the attribution issues have been resolved. I've created a template for it: template:mergesource, which I am about to add to the pages. -- Gordon Ecker 09:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

They're all tagged now. -- Gordon Ecker 10:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Attribution issues for all the tagged pages have been resolved, however we should be on the lookout for pages with "merged" as part of their reasons for deletion. There are probably also pages which have slipped through the cracks in the past. -- Gordon Ecker 09:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Strikes call on Droks run article

24.171.16.22 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Having some problems convincing the user to stop adding non-relevant content on Beacon's Perch - Droknar's Forge run.--Fighterdoken 01:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Seems to have stopped for now. Will block if he vandalises again. --Lemming 02:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Skakid

Trolled my page. >:( http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User_talk:NoXiFy --'ÑöẊĭƑý 07:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Stop trolling yourself before accusing others of trolling. - anja 08:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Please Reinstate Defenders of Draconis [DoD] Guild page

Subject says it all; I am unaware of when this page was deleted due to inactivity, but would like it reinstated, as I am in the process of redeveloping the Guild's online resources, and would like to have the GWW information available.

TIA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.248.18.128 (talk • contribs) at 22:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC).

Done -- Guild:Defenders Of Draconis. -- Brains12 \ talk 22:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Please Reinstate the League of Friends [LOF]guild page

Apparently our page was removed at some point and I'd like to ask for it to be reinstated as the guild is still very active. Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.70.92.160 (talk • contribs) at 21:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC).

Please provide the correct guild name to have the page restored. Guild:League Of Friends never existed. poke | talk 22:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Guild:The League Of Friends might be it but I can't be sure. --Kakarot 02:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Its the Guild:The League Of Friends. As it was deleted for inactivity and says "the League of Friends [LOF]. Dominator Matrix 02:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok I have restored that one. --Lemming 02:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

NPA

sorry if this is in the wrong place but id like to point out what i think is a further NPA from User:Burning Freebies made on this talk page User_talk:Angel#KISS. the text in question is

• Chirs did violate and threaten me. He also caused me a lot of trouble with the event. Im suprised he is a "respected" member of the alliance.

The text in fact is referencing a thread discussion on the [KISS]alliance forums where no such actions were performed by myself.i did not threaten this user in anyway and am struggling to see why this has been brought onto wiki and posted on a highly respected alliance members userpage.It doesnt belong and quite simply isnt true BlackBlood talk 19:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

That's not a PA for me, but I'll leave it to someone else to decide.. poke | talk 19:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Update: blocked Burning Freebies (talk • contribs • logs • block log) and Angel (talk • contribs • logs • block log) for their personal attacks and whatnot. Personal disputes about guilds and alliances don't belong here. -- Brains12 \ talk 20:45, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Please Reinstate the Ascalon Resistance [AR] Guild Page

Our guild is very small but still active, I wasn't aware that there had to be some level of activity on the guild's page to maintain its existence. Please reinstate, thanks. --GenXer 23:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Done -- Guild:Ascalon Resistance. -- Brains12 \ talk 23:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Admin Rights

Quite simply put, they should not have the ability to sensor content on User Talk pages, without valid reasoning and user consent. Is that really so much to ask, or has this Wiki evolved into some twisted dictatorship? My issue was of significant importance; I was neither trolling nor berating Izzy in anyway whatsoever. If Izzy feels that my topic should be moved to a different section, then let HIM be the one to decide and move it there himself. I don't want excuses, or vague responses; I merely want results. Again, is this too much to ask? --Readem 12:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Commentary goes on talk page. -Auron 12:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

And which talk page exactly, that includes all administrators are you referring to Auron? --Readem 12:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Ah, he vaguely refers to this. --Readem 13:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Readem

Readem (talk • contribs • logs • block log). Trolling and wikilawyering just to stir people up. Few examples; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. -Auron 12:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

How am I wiki-lawyering? I don't even know what the fuck that is. I am just disagreeing about admin rights, and apparently this doesn't settle to well with Auron. I am going for no heart-strings; if telling you the cold hard facts as I see them "riles you up", welcome to the real world. Having opinions is not illegal Auron; not even on Wiki's. --Readem 12:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Appropriate I believe The beginning... --Readem 13:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

IMO the first and fourth edits are clear-cut trolling. I don't see anything wrong with the other three edits. -- Gordon Ecker 00:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

GWW:NPA

Faer (talk • contribs • logs • block log). Repeated violations, mostly in the form of namecalling. Well aware of policy. Backsword 17:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Links to specific revisions? I couldn't find anything. - anja 18:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Eg. calling User:HH LEADER a "retard" here. Backsword 18:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I saw that one and as you say Faer is aware of that. I was more curious of "repeated". As it is now, I don't find it block-worthy, Faer is notified. Repeated violations changes the situation. - anja 18:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

72.223.77.197 (talk • contribs • logs • block log). Threatened to murder Izzy here. I checked a few of his recent edits and they're mostly disruptive. I'm not a 100% sure he's the one who posted it though, because I am not that great with the History fuction. I added his IP because I think it was him. Still, a death threat was issued and action should be taken against the person who issued it, wheter it is him or someone else. 145.94.74.23 07:33, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Blocked by Brains12. -- Gordon Ecker 08:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Personal attacks and sockpuppetry

backsword (talk • contribs • logs • block log)<-Account 76.25.197.215 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)<-IP- Swearing against a person defending their suggestion.Miekit 07:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

If you're referring to this edit, it appears that the anonymous editor was suggesting that you direct your complaints towards Backsword and did so in a rude manner. IMO the anonymous editor was not claiming to be Backsword, and may have been trying to get you into an arguement with Backsword. -- Gordon Ecker 08:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Also, the anonymous editor was not "swearing against you", but using an alternate meaning of "bitch", meaning "put forth an argument" or "direct your issues" and linking to where he thought you should do so (Backsword's page). Even so, opposition to deletion goes on the talk page of the page up for deletion, i.e. ArenaNet talk:Guild Wars 2 suggestions/Blood Connection. -- Brains12 \ talk 10:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

In that context, it's basically an impolite way of saying "complain". -- Gordon Ecker 11:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

More NPA against Isaiah

Here. Plus those are sarcastic suggestions in the place of real suggestions, cluttering that part of the wiki even more. Erasculio 20:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleted the page as G1/G5; warned RitualDoll (talk • contribs • logs • block log). -- Brains12 \ talk 22:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Jette

Jette (talk • contribs • logs • block log) Some of Jette's recent posts have been problematic: this post includes a clear-cut personal attack, and this post includes a joke about a mail bomb. Should we just block or should we start an arbitration case? -- Gordon Ecker 03:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't want to take action myself due to a conflict of interest, specifically my involvement in that discussion. -- Gordon Ecker 05:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Reverted admin removal of content on ArenaNet:Guild Wars suggestions, by the way.--Fighterdoken 08:03, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Brains12 \ talk 13:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

RitualDoll

RitualDoll (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Trolling, trolling, more trolling, albeit less severe, signature violates policy and the user refuses to comply. General unhelpful attitude, which, combined with comments like "If you care about it, you do it" (in regards to archiving) and those found here remove my ability to AGF in this case. Can any sysops deal with this? Thanks. -Auron 07:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Brains12 \ talk 13:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Guild talk:The Imperium Of Lazy Nation

Someone may want to take a look at the talk page. A revert war going between two users about a self-removal of content on the talk page, and one of them actually getting quite close to trolling after a long rant related to the guild instead of the article intself.--Fighterdoken 22:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

I've commented on that page, and I'll be keeping an eye on it. -- Brains12 \ talk 23:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

74.170.90.37 (talk • contribs • logs • block log) has been blocked for 3 days for posting after the admin's warning, as will any additional posters. -- Wyn 01:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Protection for Guild talk:The Imperium Of Lazy Nation

It needs full protection (up to sysops). As due to the amount of flaming, the time frame, and the large alliance that is with it, it needs it. Dominator Matrix 00:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

See above section. Calor 00:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Key

Backsword (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Biscuits (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Please take a look at this edit, the corresponding talk page, and the page history, and my talk page. This information is incorrect, and I can't revert it because of GWW:1RR. Attempting to keep this minor detail correct has resulted in a large silly argument that I don't really want to continue. Biscuits 08:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Backsword (talk • contribs • logs • block log) Blocked for violation of GWW:1RR -- Wyn 09:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

For the record it should be noted that I did not break 1RR. Backsword 09:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Dark Morphon

Called me a nigger... I am in fact an African American and feel extremely unwanted on this website. I thought this was the official wiki for Arenanet, if so... why are you aloud to call people 'niggers'. Please deal with this.--24.195.135.159 22:46, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

no one is going to deal with this until you provide a link im afraid--Raph Talky 22:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

edit:i checked your talk page, i think he was saying that as in the word was funny (i dont think i understand morphon anymore....), but unless we see proof for any of your accusations, it didnt happen. Give us proof or you complaint gets the boot, so to speak--Raph Talky 22:52, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Also worth of mention for this case is Guild Wars Wiki talk:Elections/2008-08 bureaucrat election/Auron#I don't like Auron. and User talk:76.25.197.215.--Fighterdoken 22:57, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) Warned Dark Morphon (talk • contribs • logs • block log). Raph, don't make claims that are simply untrue; while links are encouraged, they are not necessary for sysops to take action -- we have enough skills to look through a contribution list. To be honest, I don't see why you're commenting here. -- Brains12 \ talk 22:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

point taken, though by proof i speaking of auron's "in game insults"--Raph Talky 23:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

He was trolling. Also, try not to spam the noticeboard with comments, just let the sysops deal with issues. -Auron 06:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Rooney

Rooney (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Spambot for some online sites, check the recent additions to "his" talk page. -Auron 06:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Warned. -- Wyn 06:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Isaiah's talk page...

...Is again being used for discussion among users, as seen over there. Are we supposed to point out this kind of thing, or would it be better to just stay quiet and wait until an admin notices it himself/herself? There is the "Notice to administrators above" about this already, and I'm fairly sure a couple admins are already watching that page, but in other hand it's usual for people to make notices here even if they're expecting the problem to be noticed eventually... Erasculio 18:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Probably best to report it here. It's better to get at it as soon as someone sees it, reinforcing the "hard-line stand" instead of waiting until an admin notices it him/herself. (Don't shoot me for commenting) Calor 18:24, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Cleaned up. And yes, as Calor says, report here if it goes unseen (i.e. admins are active, but haven't cleaned it up) -- generally only for the obvious things, so as not to crowd the noticeboard for each issue (or non-issue, as the case may be). -- Brains12 \ talk 19:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Professor Dog

Professor Dog (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Obvious troll is obvious. Don't think I really need to provide evidence - he's messed with Auron's user page, the chess game, and flooded his own user page, not to mention throwing pre tags on his talk... -- Armond Warblade 12:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

How am I a troll, you're the one that's trolling my talk. Auron's page was a copyright violation, aren't we supposed to tag copyright violations for deletion? Pre tags make the talk page easier to read on my monitor, why can't I use them? --File:Professordog.jpgProfessor Dog 12:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

You're either a professional troll or really, really dumb. If you're trolling, just stop, it's not funny. If you're dumb (which, for the sake of realism and hope for humanity, I don't think you are), go off wiki and educate yourself a bit. -- Armond Warblade 12:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

the copyvio is for images only. and pre tags kinda annihilate any sense a wiki has. - Y0_ich_halt 13:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing up the copyright situation. What do you mean by saying they annihilate the sense? --File:Professordog.jpgProfessor Dog 13:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Brains12 \ talk 14:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Armond

Armond (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

NPAing me in the above section and trolling/vandalising my talk page. --File:Professordog.jpgProfessor Dog 12:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Add general trolling, and hostility to that. Dominator Matrix 12:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

The accusations of trolling I'll admit guilt to on occasion. I'd like to see where you think I've been hostile, though - I can pretty much guarantee it'll just be some oversensitive person reading too much into my apathy. -- Armond Warblade 12:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

[4]. Dominator Matrix 13:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Apathy. If it weren't for my "no userboxes except those relating to game balance" policy, I'd steal Auron's DNGAF box. -- Armond Warblade 13:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism and spam, possibly unintentional

Markparagon (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Starting a new section for this, as it is not a staightforward case. This user keeps posting the same incoherrent suggestion over and over. Obviously have a very poor grasp of English. AGF, they may well think what they are doing is what they are supposed to. But in the end, the result is the same. Vandalism still makes thwe wiki harder to use for others, and wastes our time in cleaning up. Since repeated warnings will not work, I believe it's time to consider a shorter ban. Backsword 08:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

I've given him a day block. I don't think his English is so bad that he can't understand the notices on his talk page, and as you say, it means a lot of unnecessary cleanup and disorganisation of the suggestion section. -- Brains12 \ talk 13:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Possible NPA

I think it might be an idea for an admin to review the contents of this page. As itsgetting out of hand very quickly. -- Salome 20:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Considering Burning Freebies (talk • contribs • logs • block log) has been blocked for similar behaviour before, and has since been warned to stop posting on KISS-related pages, then continuing his behaviour on the linked page, I've blocked him for three days. I've warned the others, although I hope you can talk to them in-game and tell them to leave their issues at the door; you seem to know them (or their alliance) personally, and that's always useful. I'll keep an eye on those pages, and the contributions of those users. -- Brains12 \ talk 20:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Not to discuss on the noticeboard, but I only really know KISS in passing but I will have a wee word with the people I know and make sure that it is known that personal issues have no place on the wiki. Thank you for your expedient action Brains. :) -- Salome 20:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

I will happily talk to yourself brains/Salome ingame and do my best to put the issue to sleep or at least in some sort of perspective on wiki's behalf.I'm in game now as it happens:Calista Blackblood BlackBlood - talk 21:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Block in order?

76.25.197.215 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

I think another block for this IP is in order. Just check the September 4th update discussion page and you'll see why it's pretty obvious. IP has also been previously warned before. — ク Eloc 貢 04:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Maybe keep an eye on 75.94.77.148 (talk • contribs • logs • block log) too. — ク Eloc 貢 04:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Also 86.138.118.119 (talk • contribs • logs • block log) --JonTheMon 17:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Report

(already blocked) 70.190.103.3 (talk • contribs [deleted] • logs • block log • abuse filter log) violation of GWW:1RR here, and I'm out of reverts. Biscuits 07:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

reverted. If there is some activity again, please tell me. poke | talk 10:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Comment Removal

Could we get some moderation at ArenaNet talk:Skill feedback/Miscellaneous/General balancing guidelines? User:71.174.27.219 has been removing Cursed's comments for the second time. I cannot revert without breaking 1RR, and I also believe 71 has only the best intentions of his page at heart. Even so, are his actions appropriate? -- NUKLEAR IIV 20:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Reverted and warned. -- Wyn 20:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for ignoring the warning. -- Wyn 20:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Isaiah's Talk Page

...Has a couple things there that probably belong elsewhere (the latest section is a matter of balance feedback, for example). I would like a sysop to take a look there and see what he/she thinks. Erasculio 03:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

NuclearVII

Look at the history of almost every Dervish Skill Feedback especially Skill Feedback Dervish Reap Impurities. Has put up "This page needs cleanup" unnecessary in most of them but Reap Impurities is done with profanity.
Please look at Visions of Regret Wowie discussion page and his comments. Is profanity permitted?--Wealedout 05:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes. We don't censor comments. Did he personally attack anyone or vandalize any pages? -Auron 05:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

He marked the page as candidate for deletion because "Comparing this to victorious sweep, when victorious is broken as fuck", almost every Dervish Skill Feedback does not need cleanup when it is marked for clean up by Nuclear.--Wealedout 05:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

IMO, Nuclear is right. The great majority of pages he has tagged for deletion do deserve to be deleted; and the pages he marked for clean up either need better wording in order to convey what they're trying to say, or have some bad ideas that could be deleted while keeping the others on the same article. Erasculio 12:41, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Wealedout

Wealedout (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

1RR, here, here, here and here. Main reason I'm linking those pages is because I'm not sure of what procedure is used - should (could?) those reverts be undone? Erasculio 14:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I've notified the user about 1RR and general practice if one opposes a tag. As we have no formatting guideline for those pages yet, it's probably not entirely necessary to tag those as not fulfilling it. If you still think a tag should belong, start discussing instead of continuing the reversions -- that won't help anything. -- Brains12 \ talk 16:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Gaile Gray imposter?

have a look at Gaile talk's page history. you will notice that one of the most recent contribution is "20:56, 15 September 2008 Gaіle Gray (Talk | contribs)"

i have no idea what this means. this user has only few contributions, and exactly the same name as gaile. and even less logical: one of the links is red while the other one is blue, although i even copy+pasted them. any ideas? - Y0_ich_halt 21:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Already resolved. *Defiant Elements* +talk 21:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

still curious as to what it was. - Y0_ich_halt 21:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Unicode "i" instead of the letter "i." Appears the same on most browsers. -70.95.75.52 21:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

wow, i checked for the capital "I" instead of "l" thing, but i wasn't expecting something like this o.O thanks. - Y0_ich_halt 21:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of that. *offers thumbprint for proof of identity* :) -- Gaile 22:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

There's another one: GaiIe Gray (talk • contribs • logs • block log) with an uppercase I instead of a lowercase l, who has been blocked by Wynthyst. -- Gordon Ecker 22:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Guild Translation Reversion War

Regarding the Guild:La S N K Des Rosde Wollfk page reverting between translation tag and not.

81.13.248.197 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

TheRave (talk • contribs • logs • block log) (me)

Warned for breaking 1RR. -- Indochine talk 19:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Probelm with the feedback pages

It seems to me that there a large number of delete tags being removed without any discussion. I was under the impression that this was against some part of the policy, so I kept adding them in and giving warning on pages themselves. However, it seems that a number of IP's (maybe the same person) have been reverting me. I cannot add the tags back in without violating 1RR, so I was hoping for a bit more moderation down there.

Two pages with this issue: http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/ArenaNet:Skill_feedback/Miscellaneous/Resurrection_Signet and http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/ArenaNet:Skill_feedback/Miscellaneous/General_balancing_guidelines

In the meantime, I'm going to try and stay out of it - and keep a cool head. -- NUKLEAR IIV 15:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Tags have been replaced, and user has been asked to discuss. -- Wyn 15:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Pikin talk page

Verbal abuse on talk page. Didis 07:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I think that one is already dealt with on the talk page. --Xeeron 11:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Multiple accounts for a single person?

← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard#Multiple accounts for a single person

Comment removal...

I think I'm some kind of magnet! -- NUKLEAR IIV 14:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

I blocked two of them for vandalism. -- Gordon Ecker 00:50, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Personal Attacks

92.131.91.76 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Keeps attacking people through the summary of the edit page, even after being warned by TheRave. --MageMontu 14:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for a day & warned. --Xeeron 16:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Armond (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Personal attack by Armond here.--Wealedout 19:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

See below; he's been banned by Xeeron. -- Brains12 \ talk 21:21, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Malicious Bots creating Page

I've noticed that the Guild:Dark Betrayers page keeps being recreated and edited with random comments by a number of random anonymous users. Its been deleted six or so times as well. It strikes me that it possibly could be random bots attacking the wiki. Shouldn't the page be protected so it can't be recreated somehow?- TheRave (talk) 23:42, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, create=autoconfirmed protected. -- Brains12 \ talk 00:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

User conflict

This was brought to my attention at User talk:Ab.er.rant#Personal attack. -- ab.er.rant 14:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

I already noticed that and blocked Armond for the personal attack. --Xeeron 15:33, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

User conflict

Super Igor (talk • contribs • logs • block log) is back after an one week block, still pursuing conflict with Lilondra. Erasculio 19:14, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Blocked Super Igor and warned Lilondra. --Xeeron 19:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

More NPA from the same user here. Erasculio 15:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Brains12 \ talk 16:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

By passing Ban

Birthday Grinch (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Circumventing ban/sockpuppet of User:MgrinshponDominator Matrix 02:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. calor (talk) 02:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

1RR Violation

75.182.89.73 (talk • contribs • logs • block log) I have a strong belief that they violated NPA, correct me if I'm wrong. -- WoB 04:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

...Wow. Just wow. Moving an edit link to a more convenient place is NPA now? And I thought I'd heard it all... 75.182.89.73 04:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Good job changing the link so my comment looks completely unrelated. So now it's an NPA violation to discuss whether certain edits should be removed. Right, glad that's cleared up... 75.182.89.73 04:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

This does not belong on the noticeboard. -- Wyn 04:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

NPA

75.182.89.73 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Here Tried reasoning with and still refuses to follow policies or listen to a Sysops. here or here. Overall being a disruption to the wiki and the Sysops. I recommend a Arbitration committee if user does not cooperate. — Seru Talk 06:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh man, I talked shit about the sysops and now I might go up to arbcom? Were I a logged in user, no one would care, seriously...

Also, man, universe must have asploded if policies are considered persons. Just sayin'. 75.182.89.73 06:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Blocked by Auron. -- Brains12 \ talk 12:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Izzy's Page

The personal attacks on Izzy have started again. One user has even impersonated him. Its up to you if you want to take action, I just reported it. 87.210.150.58 09:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Dealt with. -- Brains12 \ talk 12:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Misery

A whole collection of sockpuppets of User:Tab, trying to circumvent block. -- Wandering Traveler 13:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Blocked -- Wyn 13:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I think me and Wyn got all of them now. Though I doubt it will make much of a difference, it is very easy to create accounts. - anja 13:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

This be one of the worst ones huh? --Silverleaf Don't assume, ask! 13:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Racism

Vael Victus (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

1 ~ Kurd 21:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for NPA. --Xeeron 21:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Abusive Sysop

← moved to User talk:Auron

Potential edit war

here. I don't want to continue it. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 04:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it deserves any admin action at this time. His quote is a bit out of context, which has been pointed out on his talk page, and if he feels the need to vent that badly let it be, as long as it remains on his own page. -- Wyn 06:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Armond Warblade: NPA

Told me to "shut the fuck up" on my own userpage? http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User_talk:NoXiFy#GG_AURON --'ÑöẊĭƑý 21:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw that. Bringing in game issues to the wiki is something you've been now told repeatedly to stop doing. This doesn't belong on the noticeboard. -- Wyn 21:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I would like to note that it doesn't particularly matter where the comment is - I'd be as much in the wrong (or right, however you care to look at it) whether it was on your talk or anywhere else. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 22:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

vandal

To Kill A Sockingbird (talk • contribs • logs • block log) - Not a vandal, but fairly obviously a sockpuppet. Hasn't done anything harmful yet, but may be worth keeping an eye on. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 14:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

No action by now. poke | talk 16:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Skakid trolling again

http://www.wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User_talk:NoXiFy

Bringing up HA in a total random discussion.--'ÑöẊĭƑý 20:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Your face is trolling again.. Be sure to be less provocating or you'll risk another block, Noxify. poke | talk 20:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

— Galil 20:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

What skakid said is the least of what is going on on that talk page. I suggest you don't bring it up again here, this is not the place for self indulgent trolling. --Lemming 21:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Joko's Domain

← moved to Help:Ask a game question

Edit War

← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard

More edit conflicts

Ayla (talk • contribs • logs • block log) and 1RR at Aura of Holy Might. Erasculio 17:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Content discussion is ongoing on the talk page. poke | talk 18:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Imo, not a breach of 1RR. There is only one revert by Ayla (the last edit), the second to last one is adding something new, not reverting. Also, as poke mentioned, discussion on the talk page seems to have started. --Xeeron 18:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

NPA....Of doom

Uchiha Lena‎ (talk • contribs • logs • block log) here after being warned about such behavior. Erasculio 19:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Seems to have stopped since the warning for now. However the personal attack on User talk:Ryudo has also been noted. Any further breaches of NPA will certainly result in a ban from me. --Lemming 20:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

More NPA?

Continuing from here, now Uchiha Lena‎ (talk • contribs • logs • block log) made this edit. Erasculio 01:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. *Defiant Elements* +talk 01:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Request undeletion for the Everlasting Sacred Path Guild page

It has come to my attention that the guild wiki page http://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=Guild:Everlasting_Sacred_Path has been deleted. While I am not sure how this page was ever removed, the guild is still very much active. Rather than start the page over again from scratch, it may be easier if you could reinstate the previous page, which we could then update with whatever pertinent information is necessary to make the page current again.

I thank you in your response to this request. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Espkaruna (talk).

It has been restored. -- Wyn 08:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Request for protection (GW2 page)

Looking at the history there has been a lot of revisions needed by anons adding info. We should semi protect the page to prevent more vandalism and to reduce the amount of unneeded edits. Dominator Matrix 03:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

This has been brought up several times, and determined it's not worth it as the edits are easily and quickly reverted. -- Wyn 03:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

I've protected it from unregistered edits for a month, as it's one of the most vandalized pages on the wiki. When was protection determined not to be worth it? In this discussion, protection seems to have been rejected due to it being misinterpreted as a request to protect the talk page, and in this discussion there was concensus for protection, but no one bothered to take it to the admin noticeboard. -- Gordon Ecker 04:32, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Continious NPA violations?

Shard (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

This user is constantly attacking Izzy, either directly or by indirectly naming the failure of a game balancer. Even when he's not using a name, it is clear that these posts are meant as an attack on Izzy. 145.94.74.23 16:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Both of them are borderline NPA. For now, I'd let it be, but if he posts more, similar inflammatory or otherwise NPA-violating content, we can look into it more (unless someone else feels strongly pro-action against Shard). calor (talk) 02:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Skakid trolling... again.

http://www.wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=User_talk:NoXiFy&redirect=no Very random, and contains NPA. 2 day ban please (do your job sysops.)--'ÑöẊĭƑý 21:07, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Warned. --Xeeron 11:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

← moved to Guild Wars Wiki talk:Admin noticeboard#Skakid trolling... again.

Armond Warblade

Discussing on this page. Look up.--'ÑöẊĭƑý 22:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Discussion on the Admin Noticeboard isn't ban-worthy (we simply move said discussion to the talk page). Your consistent abuse of the Admin Noticeboard, on the other hand, (i.e. accusing other users of trolling when you yourself are the primary source of trolling, etc.) is, in my opinion, given your obviously wanton disregard. *Defiant Elements* +talk 22:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

NoXiFy, you've been warned on several occasions to stop misusing the noticeboard for your trolling and other nonsense. -- Wyn 22:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Alan2300

Can someone check that? I'm way to tired to comprehend it myself, but it seems more of an advertisement/web hosting page then an actual talk page. My mind may be crafting delusions though.....don't know. -- Wandering Traveler 03:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. *Defiant Elements* +talk 04:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Back again BlackBlood - talk 02:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Deleted again. -- Wyn 02:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Crimmastermind

Has made personal attacks against me here. I don't think I attacked him personally, but if I did, I am accepting a warning/block without complaining, provided I can still look at this site (because my wife uses the same IP and I don't want to obstruct her use of this page because of my foolishness). 145.94.74.23 09:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Added a warning to the conversation. -- Wyn 12:42, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

User: Noxify again...

NoXiFy (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Back from the ban breaking NPA, ignoring GWW:USER (on talk page) and trolling in general. I am unsure on requesting intervention here, or if ARBCOMM would be better at this point.--Fighterdoken 19:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Poke has already blocked him. --Lemming 21:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)